Mississippi Liberal

FUCK THE POLICE

911 EVERY DAY
Frank E. Smith, the best congressmen Mississippi ever had. Thrown out of office for supporting John Kennedy. Believed in racial reconcilliation but lied about it for political expediency.


Instead of turning toward hatred after his father was murdered by a black man in 1926, Frank E. Smith (1918-1997) committed himself to help his racist state move toward integration and racial harmony. He was an anomaly in his heyday, a white politician who staunchly supported the civil rights movement at home. As a young man growing up in the Mississippi Delta, arguably one of the most segregated and violent regions in America during the Jim Crow era, Smith made the decision to work for political and social change in Mississippi.After serving in World War II, he returned to the Delta to assist in founding a liberal newspaper in Greenwood. To heighten his chances for winning a seat in the state senate, he lied about his liberal views on race. After being elected to the U.S. Congress during six terms, he worked quietly for integration.For openly supporting John F. Kennedy's bid for the presidency, Smith lost the congressional seat he had held for thirteen tumultuous but productive years. After the election in 1960, Kennedy appointed him to the governing board of the Tennessee Valley Authority, on which Smith served until 1972. In this position he clashed with the growing environmental movement outside the TVA. At the same time, he worked with the Southern Regional Council and the Voter Education Project to register black voters throughout the South.As he struggled for racial progress and understanding, Smith rejected Black Power, which he denounced as racism. That position, and his refusal to support environmental extremists in the left-wing branches of the Democratic Party, put him at odds with his liberal base. He suffered exile from Mississippi and accepted academic postsaround the country until an ally won the governor's office in Mississippi. Smith ended his political career as a special assistant to Governor William F. Winter.As this biography details the conflicting political terrains in Smith's life, it reveals the complexities of his political and social views and shows Smith as a man at odds both with the conservative establishment of the 1960s and left wing of his own party.
 
Hello Mr. Vader. What brought this one? The man did not pass away recently, like, say, Paul W. Tibbets.

I was just searching for stuff about Mississippi elections and stumbled upon this. I now hate every individual in office in Mississippi so I guess it's appropriate.
 
With all your self-loathing, you should run (lie about your positions if you have to to get elected) so that you can truly appreciate hating every official in MS.
 
With all your self-loathing, you should run (lie about your positions if you have to to get elected) so that you can truly appreciate hating every official in MS.

How do I loathe myself? I loathe MS. That's not WM. And I hate your state too. Far too conservative.
 
WTF? Washington is a state dominated by Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia liberals. Seattle voted 70% for Kerry. Now, outside the metropoles it is a happy medium and eastern WA is very conservative, but they have little pull. The state GOP does tend to lean pretty far to the right though...
 
WTF? Washington is a state dominated by Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia liberals. Seattle voted 70% for Kerry. Now, outside the metropoles it is a happy medium and eastern WA is very conservative, but they have little pull. The state GOP does tend to lean pretty far to the right though...

:)

Do you really think Kerry is as liberal as me, Three?
 
I wouldn't run for office in Mississippi and sell my soul by lying about my political positions. There's no way it would be worth it.

Warren, however, seems adamant about staging a "religious conversion" sometime and running on a hyper-conservative image.
 
The South is a great place to live, no wonder so many people are moving there.

They have the lowest local property taxes per capita/year. Including Arkansas ($191), Alabama ($285), Kentucky ($376), New Mexico ($380), and Oklahoma ($425).

The states with the highest local property taxes per capita/year are: New Jersey ($1,871), Connecticut ($1,733), New York ($1,402), and Rhode Island ($1,369).
All states that losing people who are moving to the south.

People want lower taxes, not more Socialism and they show that in their mobility. Waterboardedmark is just the odd Socialist out there and needs to move to somewhere Liberal to compare and see just how good he had it.
 
"People want lower taxes, not more Socialism and they show that in their mobility."

Didn't you admit on another thread that you were probably wrong about people moving for ideological reasons, since AZ is becoming more purple?

Or do you still want to try to make this idiotic argument when it's convenient for you?
 
"People want lower taxes, not more Socialism and they show that in their mobility."

Didn't you admit on another thread that you were probably wrong about people moving for ideological reasons, since AZ is becoming more purple?

Or do you still want to try to make this idiotic argument when it's convenient for you?

I think it might be different with Cali moving people now, based on how states they move to are becoming more centrist.
As for the northeast movers, I've seen no evidence of that, just complaints on taxes, cost of living and desire for less of that which Conservatism in other states brings.
 
"As for the northeast movers, I've seen no evidence of that, just complaints on taxes, cost of living and desire for less of that which Conservatism in other states brings."

Oh...you've been conducting interviews with the folks who are re-locating have you? More "Danecdotal" evidence?

What a hack. You should really hear yourself once in awhile.
 
Increased population density inevitably leads to greater social liberalism and, in the case of the United States, political liberalism. Cities are almost always more liberal than rural areas.

As these areas increase in population their politics will change, just as is now happening in Arizona.
 
Increased population density inevitably leads to greater social liberalism and, in the case of the United States, political liberalism. Cities are almost always more liberal than rural areas.

As these areas increase in population their politics will change, just as is now happening in Arizona.
I think that's generally true, but remember that Phoenix was/is the more Conservative part of Arizona.
 
The South is a great place to live, no wonder so many people are moving there.

They have the lowest local property taxes per capita/year. Including Arkansas ($191), Alabama ($285), Kentucky ($376), New Mexico ($380), and Oklahoma ($425).

The states with the highest local property taxes per capita/year are: New Jersey ($1,871), Connecticut ($1,733), New York ($1,402), and Rhode Island ($1,369).
All states that losing people who are moving to the south.

People want lower taxes, not more Socialism and they show that in their mobility. Waterboardedmark is just the odd Socialist out there and needs to move to somewhere Liberal to compare and see just how good he had it.

Yeah... but they make more. That's why they have more income.
 
Yeah... but they make more. That's why they have more income.
Property tax rates correlate to income do they?

Let's use some common sense, they are not moving there because they are getting a worse deal right?
They realize that income may be lower but that cost of living makes it more than worth it.
When housing and taxes are your 2 largest expenses and they are, then it makes sense to take a pay cut if you are still going to live better overall.

Purchasing power is what matters, NOT income.
 
I think that's generally true, but remember that Phoenix was/is the more Conservative part of Arizona.

Pheonix sure is an oddity. But they are more economic conservative like you, not religious conservative like Mississippi.

Mississippi has not growing faster than hyper-socialist NE states, however, most of the population growth and intra-state migration is going west, to liberal states like California, and to more libertarian states in the subelt like Arizona.

Evidence for this can be found in that that between 1990 and 2000, Mississippi experienced one of its largest population jumps in a while, but we still lost a seat in the house because we weren't growing as fast as the nation in general, most of the growth happening to the west.
 
Property tax rates correlate to income do they?

Let's use some common sense, they are not moving there because they are getting a worse deal right?
They realize that income may be lower but that cost of living makes it more than worth it.
When housing and taxes are your 2 largest expenses and they are, then it makes sense to take a pay cut if you are still going to live better overall.

Purchasing power is what matters, NOT income.

Yes, of course, but a state like NH can easily go without a sales and income tax because it's denizens make so much more money (and have more purchasing power overall). The put that into their property, and into other taxes.

If Mississippi went without a sales and income tax we'd have to dismantle our education system. We're goddamn poor and to have all of the government services that's expected we unfortunately have to tax a greater proportion of income. We manage to do well, though, our taxes are still low by national standards.
 
Back
Top