I am only bound by what I consider moral, I don't live in a prison of what others decide is moral for me. Just because you do, does not justify your anger at those who have a more filled life.
This is not about the woman's morals, there is a victim in this case!

Maybe she is only bound by what she considers moral and doesn't live in a prison of what others decide is moral for her, Counselor.![]()
It's not about her morals.
Maybe she doesn't live in a prison of what others decide is moral for her. Just because you do, does not justify your anger at those who have a more filled life, does it?
It's not about her morals, it's about the victim.
Would a 14-year-old girl be a victim, Counselor?
On what, exactly, Counselor?
You need to focus on your studies, I've gone over that with you before.
Witness will answer the question.
Witness has already answered, I can't help it if you can't remember, co pretend not to.
I find you in contempt.
How sick is that....
Hillard introduced the pervert to her two children, including her baby and 3-year-old daughter..
On another note, who would fuck this woman two times and get her pregnant.
I am now convinced that you are a FUCKING IDIOT. This is not about morality, it is about intruding on the rights of the child by allowing it to be used for sex. You right wingers don't get the whole consent thing. Gay relationships are about the parties consenting to that relationship. NO third party can force you to have sex against your will. So yes dumbass, if the mom "rented" out her 14 year old for sex she would also be a victim. Not surprised you don't get that.Would a 14-year-old girl be a victim, Counselor?