USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
After reading and RE-READING Mott's continual attempts to justify his behavior; I have decided to put this to a vote and hopefully this will resolve the issue, once and for all.
Mott claimed to be seer to protect himself.
obsess much?
If he was even at risk I may have understood a bit more, but we were clearly voting for Yurt at that time and would have had our first wolf... He could have pulled that crap later when he was actually under fire. And next time at least randomly pick an inactive player, somebody who hasn't pulled out even one post... Instead we lynched four active villagers.
I didn't forget. I just don't think it is necessary. Even with Mott obstructing the path we were still able to pull a victory out. It may even have served to create the confusion he says it did and keep the wolves from sticking it to Nigel some time when we weren't looking. It would have taken some powerful brainwaves to figure out his first letter of each sentence "code"...Don't forget to vote.
I didn't forget. I just don't think it is necessary. Even with Mott obstructing the path we were still able to pull a victory out. It may even have served to create the confusion he says it did and keep the wolves from sticking it to Nigel some time when we weren't looking. It would have taken some powerful brainwaves to figure out his first letter of each sentence "code"...
Right. Keeping two inactive villagers around is what saved us... Threedee didn't want us to have zero chance.In a normal game Mott would have doomed us.
It does when two villagers go for each "night"... We'd have run short of villagers rather quickly and "panic" would have created chaos.The inactives didn't matter one way or the other.
LOL Really. They're strategic idiots. The Villagers don't mean squat. As long as the Village has one more villager then the wolfs, and they have the SEER, the odds are in the Village favor.obsess much?
Counting wolf skins is poor strategy Damo. We needed to give more time to the SEER to make PEEKS. As long as theirs one wolf alive, if you lose the SEER, the odds are still in favor of the wolfs. The odds of the wolved guessing the SEER We're high and there was a lot to be gained for the SEER by putting off Yurts lynching for a while.If he was even at risk I may have understood a bit more, but we were clearly voting for Yurt at that time and would have had our first wolf... He could have pulled that crap later when he was actually under fire. And next time at least randomly pick an inactive player, somebody who hasn't pulled out even one post... Instead we lynched four active villagers.
Again, if you were even slightly at risk it may have been "strategy". As it was, even changing your one vote would have made you not at risk. Your, "I had to survive one more day" strategy wasn't useful.Counting wolf skins is poor strategy Damo. We needed to give more time to the SEER to make PEEKS. As long as theirs one wolf alive, if you lose the SEER, the odds are still in favor of the wolfs. The odds of the wolved guessing the SEER We're high and there was a lot to be gained for the SEER by putting off Yurts lynching for a while.
lol....I think it's funny you bought into his argument that he had a strategy.......the poll should have been....Do you think Mott had a strategy.....