Never Forget the Brennan-Brit Plot to Nail Trump

anatta

100% recycled karma
It cannot be repeated enough that the Mueller probe into foreign collusion was itself the product of foreign collusion. Starting even before Trump entered the presidential race, Obama’s CIA director John Brennan was colluding with foreign spies to collect unverified information about Trumpworld.
In 2014, Stefan Halper, the long-in-the-tooth CIA asset whom the FBI would later run into the Trump campaign
to entrap Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, had passed to Brennan, via Halper’s friends in British intelligence, some bizarre tattle-tale about alleged coziness between Michael Flynn and a Russian historian at Cambridge University.

Long before Flynn joined the Trump campaign in early 2016, Brennan and British intelligence were spying on him. That the CIA and FBI turned to Halper to set traps for him and others in the Trump campaign makes perfect sense. Halper was in on Spygate’s ground floor. Bloating himself for years on the American taxpayer’s dime, Halper couldn’t resist serving as a dual asset for the CIA/FBI and British intelligence.8

In all likelihood, the Trump-hating Peter Strzok, who, as we have learned from his texts, was determined to “stop” the Trump candidacy, obtained Halper’s contact info from Brennan, to whom he served as the FBI’s liaison, which is one of the most critical facts for explaining the baseless probe.
Brennan and Strzok nourished a shared hatred for Trump; Strzok would later boast to his mistress that Brennan had given him a CIA medal.


Trump should declassify all communications between Brennan and Strzok, if they exist, which is a real possibility, given what careless clowns the two of them are. Those communications would contain much of the story of Spygate.

The second form of foreign collusion underpinning the Mueller probe has gotten much more attention: the collusion between the FBI and Hillary’s foreign opposition researcher Christopher Steele.

In paying Steele $160,000, Hillary purchased more than just opposition research; she purchased FISA warrants on her opponent’s associates and a counterintelligence probe of his campaign. Through Peter Strzok, who wanted her to win “1,000,000-0,” as he put it to his mistress, the FBI was (affectively) working directly for the Hillary campaign, taking the work of her Brit spy and putting it directly into FISA warrant applications.

Meanwhile, Strzok was darting over to the CIA for Brennan’s “working Langley group” meetings, where they hashed out plans for an October surprise through Halper’s brushing up against the campaign. British intelligence must have been kept apprised of these plans, as Halper’s field of entrapment fell upon British soil.
The Five Eyes agreement between the two countries requires that they give each other fair warning about spy operations in their backyards. Besides, the Brits already had a proprietary interest in the Obama administration’s spying on Trump, having supplied the first batch of unverified fragments about Trumpworld to Brennan in 2014 and 2015.

Brennan and Strzok, relying upon media propagandists in their pockets, have worked hard to leave the impression that the pre-probe “tips” from “allies” were devastating. In fact, they were so threadbare Mueller hasn’t even bothered to interview Brennan about them, according to Brennan’s own admission. Mueller could find any of those tips in “CIA files,” Brennan has said with reckless vagueness.

Alexander Downer, the Aussie busybody who set up a meeting with Papadopoulos to pump him for information at a London bar (after British and American intelligence, it appears, gave Downer a briefing on alleged Trump-Russian collusion), took the conversational shards from that sozzled evening to a Hillary partisan at the U.S. embassy in London, Elizabeth Dibble, according to the Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel.

After Trump won, Dibble beat a hasty retreat from the State Department to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a group made famous by its one-time president Alger Hiss. Dibble is its COO.

Known primarily for greasing the wheels of the Clinton Foundation, Downer belonged to the same social circle as Dibble, Jonathan Winer (Hillary’s man at the State Department, who served as a conduit between Steele and John Kerry), and Halper, among other sorry players in this soap opera — a group of bumptious internationalists who in 2016 worked themselves up into a lather over the prospect of Trump as president.
It appears that under the coaching of Obama administration officials Downer dropped his report off with Dibble in order to sanitize the beginnings of the probe.

We know that Strzok met with Downer on his trip to London shortly after the official opening of the counterintelligence probe to seal that sanitized beginning. The point of the meeting was to shore up Downer, a more reputable source than Steele, as the official instigator of the probe while Strzok waited to see if Halper could entrap Page and Papadopoulos, and while the FBI was stitching together spying warrants from Steele’s slop.

As election day bore down upon him, Strzok hacked around desperately.
He realized that for the probe to accelerate he needed media reports about it (which Brennan took care of) and he needed to convince his colleagues to join him in Steele’s echo chamber, which stretched from London to Langley to Foggy Bottom to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, where the name of the game was making one bad piece of information (the dirty dossier) look like multiple good ones ( kiting sources)

Former FBI agent Thomas Baker, writing in the Wall Street Journal, notes what an utterly irregular sham Mueller inherited from Brennan and Strzok:

The FBI lacked any real predicate. But in the post-9/11 world, a referral from the CIA would cause some in the FBI to believe they had to act — particularly as the agency’s information originated with America’s closest ally.
Shortly after the case opened that summer, Mr. Brennan gave a briefing to then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, telling him that the CIA had referred the matter to the FBI — an obvious effort to pressure the bureau to get moving on the collusion case.

Under the post-9/11 fig leaf of CIA-FBI cooperation, Brennan ran a spy operation for the Hillary campaign straight out of CIA headquarters, with branch offices at M15 and M16 in the United Kingdom
. Against what they saw as the terrifying future of a Trump presidency, the very figures who claimed to guard the special relationship turned it, through their mutual hysteria, into something shockingly sinister.
https://spectator.org/never-forget-the-brennan-brit-plot-to-nail-trump/
 
It cannot be repeated enough that the Mueller probe into foreign collusion was itself the product of foreign collusion. Starting even before Trump entered the presidential race, Obama’s CIA director John Brennan was colluding with foreign spies to collect unverified information about Trumpworld.

13 Apr 2017
Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.

GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said. The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence included Germany, Estonia and Poland ... Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.

It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.
. . . .

The Guardian has been told the FBI and the CIA were slow to appreciate the extensive nature of contacts between Trump’s team and Moscow ahead of the US election. This was in part due to US law that prohibits US agencies from examining the private communications of American citizens without warrants. “They are trained not to do this,” the source stressed.

“It looks like the [US] agencies were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying: ‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’

“The message was: ‘Watch out. There’s something not right here.’”

More:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
 
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Yep.........
 
There are two distinct questions here which Trump apologists confuse, I think deliberately:

Was there active collusion between Trump's campaign and agents of the Russian state?
Were there enough signs of skulduggery by the summer of 2016 to demand investigation?

I am undecided about the first, but close to 100% sure of the second. There were indications that a hostile foreign power might have a hook into a presidential candidate. This situation had never arisen before in US history. What should the IC have done - ignored it?

No doubt many of the so-called Deep State (largely Republicans, ironically) despised what they knew of his character and abilities, but that isn't why his campaign was investigated.
 
Trump was involved with Russian oligarchs for decades. There was plenty of reason his relationships with Russians should have been under scrutiny. It was no personal vendetta. Trump played near the edges his whole life. Now that he is president, you can see how entangled with Russia that he is. Trump was not under enough scrurtiny.
 
Mueller told Trump's legal team last month that the president isn't a criminal target in the Russia probe at this point.
 
Gates testified that he committed crimes. He is testifying against Manafort, Trump's fucking campaign manager. A couple of crooks deep in trumps entourage. Wonder how the rightys would extrapolate that into high crimes and misdemeanors if it were Obama. Trump was running an international criminal enterprise for a decade or more. He was wrapped up with Russian and mafia characters for a long time. He was into money laundering according to Bannon. What is wrong with Trumplestilskins? All the standards you guys judged previous presidents by, you threw out the window when this guy came along. I don't get it. You should be ashamed of this jerk, instead you love him. This will not end well.
 
Last edited:
Never Forget the Brennan-Brit Plot to Nail Trump

Is this really what is has come down to?

From the exact same people who gave you PizzaGate, FEMA Death Camps, Hillary murdered Vince Foster, and Fake Birth certificates, I guess we are going to have to tolerate another Deep State conspiracy theory.

Secretary of State, Lifelong Republican, and Uber-conservative Mike Pompeo Says There Is No Deep State

"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Wednesday that he "does not believe there is a deep state" at the State Department or the CIA -- contradicting President Donald Trump's repeated assertion that there are forces within the government conspiring against him. "
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/23/politics/pompeo-trump-deep-state/index.html
zc9ULks.jpg
 
Secretary of State, Lifelong Republican, and Uber-conservative Mike Pompeo Says There Is No Deep State

George Neumayr in the American Spectator says there is, and we must never forget the Brennan-Brit plot to nail Trump.

Neumayr is an ultra-conservative Catholic who believes that the elevation of Pope Francis was a plot to destroy the Church.
Maybe he's right about that one. What do you think, anatta?
 
Back
Top