New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and

鬼百合

Let It Burn!

New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion’​



A recent study found that white Republicans who continued to support President Donald Trump after he instigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot did so out of racial resentment and a feeling that white people are now on the losing end of systemic racism.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: of all the “water is wet” news out there, this has to be the water-is-wettest. And yes, you would be correct. Still, the study published in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics serves the purpose of illustrating the power of white fragility — a phenomenon that is, apparently, so influential that it can cause a person who probably thinks of themself as a pro-police “patriot” to decide inspiring an domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. government and its police officers does not constitute a deal breaker in selecting a commander in chief.

From PsyPost:

The researchers, based at Harvard University, were interested in understanding why some Republicans continued to back Trump after the January 6th attack, despite its unprecedented nature and broad condemnation. Prior studies had already shown that many Republicans did briefly disapprove of Trump after the insurrection, but those changes were relatively small and short-lived. This study set out to explain which members of Trump’s base were more likely to remain supportive—and why.

The authors theorized that a key reason for the uneven reaction among Republicans lies in how individuals perceive their group’s place in American society. Specifically, they focused on white Republicans’ beliefs about whether white people are experiencing growing discrimination and losing their historical dominance in American politics and culture. Previous research has shown that these perceptions, often referred to as “racial status threat,” are linked to support for right-wing populism, political violence, and distrust in democracy. The researchers hypothesized that Republicans who feel this kind of threat would be less likely to withdraw support from Trump—even after he encouraged an attack on the U.S. Capitol.

To test their idea, the team conducted a series of studies using multiple datasets. In the first study, they analyzed responses from more than 5,000 white Republicans surveyed just before and after January 6th, 2021. The survey, conducted by the Nationscape project, asked respondents about their support for Trump, including favorability and job approval. Importantly, it also asked how much discrimination respondents believed white people face in society.

Pro-Trump Protests get Violent over Electoral College Certification
Source: Kent Nishimura / Getty
What researchers found was, again, pretty damn predictable. Among white Republicans who don’t happen to believe we have entered a new era of Caucasian Jim Crow, support for Trump dropped post-Jan. 6. Of white Republicans who believe white people are experiencing systemic racism in a country that is predominantly white and a government that is overwhelmingly white, support for the president who caused an insurrection on U.S. soil remained steadfast.

In the second and third studies, researchers replicated this analysis using data from the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Research Center, respectively. Both databases surveyed Americans both before and after the Capitol riot, and both studies of those databases produced generally the same results: white people continued to support propagandist and riot instigators because they’re really upset that white supremacy doesn’t feel as potent to them as it used to be. (Obviously, I’m paraphrasing here.)

More from PsyPost:

To determine whether this pattern held over time, the authors examined four additional surveys conducted between 2021 and 2024. Across all these studies, the results were consistent: white Republicans who expressed strong disapproval of January 6th were generally less supportive of Trump, but that relationship was significantly weaker among those who felt white people were under threat. Even years after the Capitol riot, status threat continued to shape how white Republicans evaluated Trump’s actions and political future.
This is why Trump’s anti-DEI propaganda has been so effective. It’s why the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory has been so thoroughly embraced by MAGA Republicans, including GOP legislators.

Trump spent months repeating factless claims that the 2020 election had been rigged against him, then he told his followers to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” which they did. It’s not any more complicated than that. Trump lied, influenced a terrorist attack, and got elected again a few years later by running a campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion.

Sad.
 

New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion’​



A recent study found that white Republicans who continued to support President Donald Trump after he instigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot did so out of racial resentment and a feeling that white people are now on the losing end of systemic racism.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: of all the “water is wet” news out there, this has to be the water-is-wettest. And yes, you would be correct. Still, the study published in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics serves the purpose of illustrating the power of white fragility — a phenomenon that is, apparently, so influential that it can cause a person who probably thinks of themself as a pro-police “patriot” to decide inspiring an domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. government and its police officers does not constitute a deal breaker in selecting a commander in chief.

From PsyPost:


What researchers found was, again, pretty damn predictable. Among white Republicans who don’t happen to believe we have entered a new era of Caucasian Jim Crow, support for Trump dropped post-Jan. 6. Of white Republicans who believe white people are experiencing systemic racism in a country that is predominantly white and a government that is overwhelmingly white, support for the president who caused an insurrection on U.S. soil remained steadfast.

In the second and third studies, researchers replicated this analysis using data from the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Research Center, respectively. Both databases surveyed Americans both before and after the Capitol riot, and both studies of those databases produced generally the same results: white people continued to support propagandist and riot instigators because they’re really upset that white supremacy doesn’t feel as potent to them as it used to be. (Obviously, I’m paraphrasing here.)

More from PsyPost:


This is why Trump’s anti-DEI propaganda has been so effective. It’s why the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory has been so thoroughly embraced by MAGA Republicans, including GOP legislators.

Trump spent months repeating factless claims that the 2020 election had been rigged against him, then he told his followers to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” which they did. It’s not any more complicated than that. Trump lied, influenced a terrorist attack, and got elected again a few years later by running a campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion.

Sad.
A.K.A. Candyass Syndrome.
 

New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion’​



A recent study found that white Republicans who continued to support President Donald Trump after he instigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot did so out of racial resentment and a feeling that white people are now on the losing end of systemic racism.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: of all the “water is wet” news out there, this has to be the water-is-wettest. And yes, you would be correct. Still, the study published in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics serves the purpose of illustrating the power of white fragility — a phenomenon that is, apparently, so influential that it can cause a person who probably thinks of themself as a pro-police “patriot” to decide inspiring an domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. government and its police officers does not constitute a deal breaker in selecting a commander in chief.

From PsyPost:


What researchers found was, again, pretty damn predictable. Among white Republicans who don’t happen to believe we have entered a new era of Caucasian Jim Crow, support for Trump dropped post-Jan. 6. Of white Republicans who believe white people are experiencing systemic racism in a country that is predominantly white and a government that is overwhelmingly white, support for the president who caused an insurrection on U.S. soil remained steadfast.

In the second and third studies, researchers replicated this analysis using data from the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Research Center, respectively. Both databases surveyed Americans both before and after the Capitol riot, and both studies of those databases produced generally the same results: white people continued to support propagandist and riot instigators because they’re really upset that white supremacy doesn’t feel as potent to them as it used to be. (Obviously, I’m paraphrasing here.)

More from PsyPost:


This is why Trump’s anti-DEI propaganda has been so effective. It’s why the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory has been so thoroughly embraced by MAGA Republicans, including GOP legislators.

Trump spent months repeating factless claims that the 2020 election had been rigged against him, then he told his followers to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” which they did. It’s not any more complicated than that. Trump lied, influenced a terrorist attack, and got elected again a few years later by running a campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion.

Sad.
Newsone is a garbage source -2 left leaning.
 

New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion’​



A recent study found that white Republicans who continued to support President Donald Trump after he instigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot did so out of racial resentment and a feeling that white people are now on the losing end of systemic racism.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: of all the “water is wet” news out there, this has to be the water-is-wettest. And yes, you would be correct. Still, the study published in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics serves the purpose of illustrating the power of white fragility — a phenomenon that is, apparently, so influential that it can cause a person who probably thinks of themself as a pro-police “patriot” to decide inspiring an domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. government and its police officers does not constitute a deal breaker in selecting a commander in chief.

From PsyPost:


What researchers found was, again, pretty damn predictable. Among white Republicans who don’t happen to believe we have entered a new era of Caucasian Jim Crow, support for Trump dropped post-Jan. 6. Of white Republicans who believe white people are experiencing systemic racism in a country that is predominantly white and a government that is overwhelmingly white, support for the president who caused an insurrection on U.S. soil remained steadfast.

In the second and third studies, researchers replicated this analysis using data from the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Research Center, respectively. Both databases surveyed Americans both before and after the Capitol riot, and both studies of those databases produced generally the same results: white people continued to support propagandist and riot instigators because they’re really upset that white supremacy doesn’t feel as potent to them as it used to be. (Obviously, I’m paraphrasing here.)

More from PsyPost:


This is why Trump’s anti-DEI propaganda has been so effective. It’s why the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory has been so thoroughly embraced by MAGA Republicans, including GOP legislators.

Trump spent months repeating factless claims that the 2020 election had been rigged against him, then he told his followers to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” which they did. It’s not any more complicated than that. Trump lied, influenced a terrorist attack, and got elected again a few years later by running a campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion.

Sad.
To the Magatards Make America Great Again means Make America white again.
 
MAGA's will have to have a reckoning at some point, with all of the moral & ethical compromises they had to make to support this amoral, deranged person.
So do you think lying to Americans about Biden's dementia and risking all of our security was moral? I don't think the left is going to be back in power for a long time.
 

New Study Shows White Republicans Still Support Trump After Jan. 6 Because Of White Grievance: ‘A campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion’​



A recent study found that white Republicans who continued to support President Donald Trump after he instigated the Jan. 6 Capitol riot did so out of racial resentment and a feeling that white people are now on the losing end of systemic racism.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: of all the “water is wet” news out there, this has to be the water-is-wettest. And yes, you would be correct. Still, the study published in the Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics serves the purpose of illustrating the power of white fragility — a phenomenon that is, apparently, so influential that it can cause a person who probably thinks of themself as a pro-police “patriot” to decide inspiring an domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. government and its police officers does not constitute a deal breaker in selecting a commander in chief.

From PsyPost:


What researchers found was, again, pretty damn predictable. Among white Republicans who don’t happen to believe we have entered a new era of Caucasian Jim Crow, support for Trump dropped post-Jan. 6. Of white Republicans who believe white people are experiencing systemic racism in a country that is predominantly white and a government that is overwhelmingly white, support for the president who caused an insurrection on U.S. soil remained steadfast.

In the second and third studies, researchers replicated this analysis using data from the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Research Center, respectively. Both databases surveyed Americans both before and after the Capitol riot, and both studies of those databases produced generally the same results: white people continued to support propagandist and riot instigators because they’re really upset that white supremacy doesn’t feel as potent to them as it used to be. (Obviously, I’m paraphrasing here.)

More from PsyPost:


This is why Trump’s anti-DEI propaganda has been so effective. It’s why the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory has been so thoroughly embraced by MAGA Republicans, including GOP legislators.

Trump spent months repeating factless claims that the 2020 election had been rigged against him, then he told his followers to go to the Capitol and “fight like hell,” which they did. It’s not any more complicated than that. Trump lied, influenced a terrorist attack, and got elected again a few years later by running a campaign designed to cater to white grievance and MAGA white delusion.

Sad.
Looks like social blowback to me. The pendulum swings to and fro until it settles in the middle. That sort of thing.
 

So what are you trying to prove????

  • Overall, we rate Newsone Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting due to a lack of transparency, despite proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY



 
The authors of the paper cited in the OP are just your run of the mill radical Leftists at a university publishing rubbish.

Their CV's

Kiara Hernandez
Ph.D. Student in Government
Kiara Hernandez is a PhD candidate in Government at Harvard University and a James M. and Cathleen D. Stone PhD Scholar in the Inequality and Wealth Concentration at the Harvard Kennedy School. Her research interests are in political psychology and political behavior. In her dissertation, she centers ethnoracially diverse, low-wage workplaces— like those in the retail and food service industries— to explore how distributional conflicts affect worker solidarity and support for unionization and other redistributive fiscal and social policies. This is part of a larger research agenda investigating the effects of economic and political precarity on intergroup cooperation and conflict in the US. Other ongoing projects include understanding peer effects on partisan sorting in the absence of strong ties (with Ryan Enos, Jacob Brown and Soubhik Barari); worker-firm ideological mismatch amongst low-wage service sector workers as a source of partisan sorting in the US (with Danny Schneider); and the effects of political violence on status threat and perceived discrimination (with Taeku Lee and Marcel Roman). Kiara graduated with a B.A. in International Relations and German from the University of Pennsylvania. Before graduate school, she spent two years as a predoctoral research specialist in the Emerging Scholars in Political Science program at Princeton University.


Taeku Lee

Taeku Lee
Bae Family Professor of Government
Taeku Lee is Bae Family Professor of Government at Harvard University. Lee has researched and written extensively on racial and ethnic politics, public opinion and political behavior, identity and inequality, and deliberative and participatory democracy.

His current projects include a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book on the centrality of race in American politics (with Zoltan Hajnal and Vincent Hutchings); a six-country study of public opinion on banks and banking (with Pepper Culpepper); research into anti-Asian American sentiments and the racial formation of Asian Americans.

Lee serves on the Board of Directors of the American Academy of Political and Social Science and the Board of Overseers of the American National Election Studies. He previously served on the National Advisory Committee for the U.S. Census Bureau (two terms), the Board of Overseers of the American National Election Studies (two previous terms), the Board of Overseers of the General Social Survey, and the Executive Council of the American Political Science Association. Lee is Senior Fellow with the AAPI Civic Engagement Fund and was co-Principal Investigator of the 2008, 2012, 2016 National Asian American Survey and Managing Director of Asian American Decisions.

He was previously on the faculty at the University of California, Berkeley and at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and has also been Robert Wood Johnson Scholar at Yale, Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute, Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Visiting Fellow at Nuffield College, Oxford.

Marcel F. Roman


Assistant Professor of Government
Marcel Roman is an Assistant Professor of Government at the Department of Government. He specializes in racial and ethnic politics in the United States, with a focus on Latinx political behavior, immigration, and policing. His book project leverages several representative Latinx surveys to demonstrate the contemporary immigration enforcement context undercuts the prospect of assimilation along multiple political dimensions among Latinx communities. He received a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California-Los Angeles and a BA in political science from the University of Kentucky.

So, just more academic dreck from academic nobodies publishing rubbish.

Unfortunately, to access their actual study is $30.00 here:

I'm not paying that to read their dreck. Given what I've seen from liberal arts types on using statistics over the decades, I suspect their work is subpar.
 
Back
Top