Now why would any sane person oppose this?

[Jake Starkey]

 

[Jake Starkey]

 

[Teflon Don]

Jakey appears triggered.

Looks like an ignore candidate

 

[serendipity]

No sensible person would but there are more than a few psychos!!

 

[Teflon Don]

Bump

 

[Jake Starkey]

Jakey appears triggered.

Looks like an ignore candidate

Yeah, go talk to the tooth fairy and Santa Claus.

You Trumpys are so fun to poke.

 

[Lionfish]

View attachment 83255

 

[Jake Starkey]

Watch Lionfish cry and ask "why" is his butt is kicked up between his ears so he hear the butt thumping he gets here daily.

 

[martin]

I have known for a very long time that the democrat party are masters at cheating but I don’t know if I have ever seen such a naked display than this.

How in the world can any sane person oppose cleaning up voter rolls to remove dead people?

What logical reason could there be for keeping dead people on voter rolls

I wonder if our JPP leftists friends will take a stab at it? Doubt it

Local voting officials routinely remove deceased residents from the rolls; always have. Evidence of voter fraud resulting from ballots cast in the names of deceased voters is approximately zero. Try not to be naive.

 

[Teflon Don]

Local voting officials routinely remove deceased residents from the rolls; always have. Evidence of voter fraud resulting from ballots cast in the names of deceased voters is approximately zero. Try not to be naive.

Really ZERO?

You still haven’t provided a reasonable excuse.

And I noticed you glossed over your whole social security number argument. I guess I humiliated you enough that you decided to leave well enough alone. Good move.

 

[martin]

Really ZERO?

You still haven’t provided a reasonable excuse.

And I noticed you glossed over your whole social security number argument. I guess I humiliated you enough that you decided to leave well enough alone. Good move.

I replied to your deceased voter argument. You couldn't humiliate a toad.

 

[Teflon Don]

I replied to your deceased voter argument. You couldn't humiliate a toad.

Yes you did reply so you get a participation trophy. It was a dumb reply, but a reply nonetheless

So you are sticking by the argument that the States are protecting social security numbers from the feds who actually has everyone’s social security numbers? That’s your argument?

 

[Jake Starkey]

Really ZERO?

You still haven’t provided a reasonable excuse.

And I noticed you glossed over your whole social security number argument. I guess I humiliated you enough that you decided to leave well enough alone. Good move.

You have given only opinion, yet you knock those who do the same?

 

[Jake Starkey]

Yes you did reply so you get a participation trophy. It was a dumb reply, but a reply nonetheless

So you are sticking by the argument that the States are protecting social security numbers from the feds who actually has everyone’s social security numbers? That’s your argument?

You are looking silly yet again. Sit down next to Matt Dillon and grab the dunce cap from him.

 

[archives]

Democras, including you, have repeatedly blocked any attempt to clean up voter rolls.

Good!

The federal government Social Security office is a government office, anchovies. They ALREADY HAVE your social security number. They CREATED it.

You don't get to speak for everyone, anchovies. Omniscience fallacy.

Denying Democrat election fraud doesn't make it go away, anchovies.

And I clearly showed why, stop lying

It is indeed good

DHS and DOJ do not unless they specifically request such which means formally explaining reasons and intent, besides, if you had read you’d know I used SS as just an example, not as the model

Ah, you don’t have an approval rate in the thirties if people trust you, duh

Don’t have, doesn’t exist