Obama is still blaming Bush for everything.

TuTu Monroe

A Realist
When will this guy ever learn?

Political Hotsheet
August 3, 2009 5:30 PM
$1 Trillion More in Debt Since Obama Took Office

Posted by Mark Knoller

So rapid is the pace of deficit spending by the federal government, that the National Debt has increased over a trillion dollars since President Obama took office.

On Inauguration Day, the Debt stood at $10.626 trillion. The latest posting from the Treasury Department shows that as of July 31st, the debt hit $11.669 trillion.

During the last administration, it took over 2 ½ years for the National Debt to increase a trillion dollars. But by the time former president George W. Bush left office, he had run up the deficit by a record amount: $4.9-trillion over eight years.

A great deal of current deficit spending was already in the pipeline from the Bush administration and Mr. Obama, anticipating this day, said that increases have to be kept in perspective.

"They basically handed me a bill for $1.3 trillion and said, 'Here, fix it,'" insisted the president last week at a Town Hall Meeting in Bristol, VA. "And now they're on TV saying, why haven't you fixed it yet -- in the middle of the greatest recession since the Great Depression."

But since Mr. Obama took office, Congress approved his $787-billion stimulus plan. In addition, the new Administration had reign over the second half of the $700-billion bank bailout program.

"Look, I understand the concern about debt," Mr. Obama said Thursday in Raleigh, N.C. "I'm looking at these spreadsheets every day. We dug ourselves a deep hole." And he concedes that the recovery package enacted on his watch has added to the problem.

"We're going to have to tighten our belt," he said. But he was quick to add that it cannot be done "just as the economy is coming out of recession. No economist would recommend that."

He says he understands those who believe the government is way too deep in red ink for him to pursue a trillion dollar program to overhaul the system of health care coverage in America, but he remains adamant about it. And he says that in the long run – over ten years - his plan will be deficit neutral and end up saving taxpayers money.

"We're not going to make progress on the deficit without dealing with health care," said spokesman Robert Gibbs today.

He said the administration doesn't think it can get the deficit under better control until it gets the economy moving again – and Mr. Obama believes health care reform is an indispensable part of that strategy.

The budget numbers issued by the Administration in May project the deficit in the current fiscal year will top $1.8-trillion dollars. But an updated report is due this month, and an even larger deficit is expected to be announced for the current fiscal year, which began October 1st – 3 ½ months before Mr. Obama was sworn in.
 
This is disgusting. This debt is totally unsustainable and the generals will be due at some point. Obama is a fiscal wreck. So was Bush and the Republican majority. Its a disgusting circle jerk and you partisan hacks only care about it when its the other party.

The road to hell is paved with partisan hackery. When Bush was the engineer on this runaway train all you jackasses were cheering him on. Party before princaple. Now you suddenly care?

Fuck that. You don't give a shit. You care far more about your party than anything. Duopolistic pawns. The parties are laughing at you. Pointing in your face and laughing, and you blind lemmings can't even see it.
 
This is disgusting. This debt is totally unsustainable and the generals will be due at some point. Obama is a fiscal wreck. So was Bush and the Republican majority. Its a disgusting circle jerk and you partisan hacks only care about it when its the other party.

The road to hell is paved with partisan hackery. When Bush was the engineer on this runaway train all you jackasses were cheering him on. Party before princaple. Now you suddenly care?

Fuck that. You don't give a shit. You care far more about your party than anything. Duopolistic pawns. The parties are laughing at you. Pointing in your face and laughing, and you blind lemmings can't even see it.

QFT
 
They are a political party, not an anarchist group. Too many people are so very uneducated about libertarian ideas.

"Libertarian" is a political party, "libertarian" is a philosophy that was hijacked by an inept group of nimrods to use as the title of their party.
 
... you partisan hacks only care about it when its the other party. ....
Not quite buddy boy. I blasted Bush for driving the Spend Train, as did all Conservatives that I know personally. He and the elected GOP created a backlash that caused many of us to stay home during the 2008 elections.
 
This is disgusting. This debt is totally unsustainable and the generals will be due at some point. Obama is a fiscal wreck. So was Bush and the Republican majority. Its a disgusting circle jerk and you partisan hacks only care about it when its the other party.

The road to hell is paved with partisan hackery. When Bush was the engineer on this runaway train all you jackasses were cheering him on. Party before princaple. Now you suddenly care?

Fuck that. You don't give a shit. You care far more about your party than anything. Duopolistic pawns. The parties are laughing at you. Pointing in your face and laughing, and you blind lemmings can't even see it.

Oh my, did you eat the worm that was in your cereal? :(
 
Not quite buddy boy. I blasted Bush for driving the Spend Train, as did all Conservatives that I know personally. He and the elected GOP created a backlash that caused many of us to stay home during the 2008 elections.

Yep and he was always trying to appease the Democrats. He signed one bill and said "Well, it's better than nothing."
 
Yep and he was always trying to appease the Democrats. He signed one bill and said "Well, it's better than nothing."

How many bills did he veto? Even while the repubs controlled everything and were spending like mad as well. Republicans in congress were/are just as bad as bush on spending.
I in no way excuse the dems for defecit spending either, but they are known for that and are not as hypocritical about it.
 
How many bills did he veto? Even while the repubs controlled everything and were spending like mad as well. Republicans in congress were/are just as bad as bush on spending.
I in no way excuse the dems for defecit spending either, but they are known for that and are not as hypocritical about it.

That's true. I really got pissed at him for not using his veto power.
 
Conservatives adored Bush and defended him at every turn until he was a lame duck.

Then it was all, "Oh, Bush? I never really liked him. He was no conservative."
Actually, during the 2000 election I said that he was a better politician then a conservative. And of course, I have been remarkably consistent with that assessment since then. *shrug*
 
Back
Top