Obama opens White House to gay Reagan haters.

More tolerance and love from the homosexual side of the Left.

But they weren't silenced.

And they didn't say "vagina"...



White%20House%20Portraits%20Flip%20Off.JPG





The White House rebuked two visitors who were photographed last week at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue flipping the middle finger below a portrait of the late President Ronald Reagan.



The guests had been invited to a reception last Friday marking gay pride month.


"While the White House does not control the conduct of guests at receptions, we certainly expect that all attendees conduct themselves in a respectful manner. Most all do," Shin Inouye, a White House spokesman, said. "These individuals clearly did not. Behavior like this doesn’t belong anywhere, least of all in the White House."



Photographer Zoe Strauss and Matty Hart, national director for public engagement at the group Solutions for Progress, had posted the images of themselves to Facebook.



Hart, under his, wrote simply: "F--- Reagan."
.
 
before their act. if you invite a guest in and that guest, unbeknownst to you, hits another guest, are you responsible?
How often does that happen in your house? When was the last time something like that happened in the WH?
 
LOL, did Obama know they'd flip off Reagan's portrait before they were invited?
 
How often does that happen in your house? When was the last time something like that happened in the WH?

irrelevant to what happened here. for example, if i invite guests over and one of them trips over a defect in my flooring, i can't very well point out that no one has ever tripped over that before as a defense.
 
No, it isn't. It shows that one knows how to pick house guests. You'd think the WH staff would have that skill mastered.

no it doesn't. they were likely vetted and likely nothing was available to show they would do this. have you ever had a friend do something you never expected them to do? or, not even a friend, but someone you knew. it happens all the time, all over the world.

this is really a non-story.
 
At the bottom of the article it said this:

"UPDATE 6/22 9:30 p.m.: According to Fox News, the White House has issued a statement rebuking some of the behavior described in this article: “While the White House does not control the conduct of guests at receptions, we certainly expect that all attendees conduct themselves in a respectful manner. Most all do. These individuals clearly did not. Behavior like this doesn’t belong anywhere, least of all in the White House.”"

So the WH denounced their actions.


That said, considering that Reagan denounced their lifestyle, giving the finger to a portrait seems a mild response.
 
no it doesn't. they were likely vetted and likely nothing was available to show they would do this. have you ever had a friend do something you never expected them to do? or, not even a friend, but someone you knew. it happens all the time, all over the world.
Not when you're expected to be on your best behavior.

Vetted, my ass. These people acted like radical activists. It's safe to say that there's history of this kind of behavior.
 
Not when you're expected to be on your best behavior.

Vetted, my ass. These people acted like radical activists. It's safe to say that there's history there.

Oh, so since the flipped a portrait of Reagan the bird, there must be a history between them and Obama or his staff??

lmao Thats pretty funny.
 
Back
Top