Obama Storm Troopers Raid Los Angeles Pot Shops

RockX

Banned
Federal officials brought their war on medical marijuana dispensaries to Los Angeles on Tuesday, raiding several shops and issuing warning letters to dozens more.

Officials at the U.S. attorney's office said it was the first large-scale federal action taken against cannabis shops in the city, and said more will probably follow.


"We couldn't do all of L.A. at once," said Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the office. "There's just too many stores."


The crackdown adds a dramatic element to the already tense fight over the fate of medical marijuana dispensaries in the city. And it underscores the stern stance of the federal government that the sale and distribution of cannabis is illegal, no matter what cities do to try to regulate the industry.


Over the last year, federal authorities have targeted pot businesses across California, including a high-profile raid at a marijuana trade school in Oakland, where proceeds on medical marijuana are taxed.



The Southern California effort began in October in Orange County and has since moved east into the Inland Empire and north into Los Angeles County. "Now we have arrived at the city of Los Angeles," Mrozek said.


Prosecutors went to court Tuesday to file civil asset forfeiture complaints against the owners of three Eagle Rock properties for allowing three commercial
marijuana stores to operate: Together for Change Collective, House of Kush and ER Collective.


The Drug Enforcement Administration also executed search warrants at three locations — in downtown, Boyle Heights and Silver Lake.


Mrozek said authorities have mailed warning letters to the property owners and operators of an additional 67 dispensaries, mostly in Eagle Rock and downtown, giving them two weeks to comply with federal law. A marijuana business in Huntington Park, believed to be the only one in that city, was also told to shut down.


The actions come as L.A. officials and medical marijuana activists gear up for a ballot measure fight over the fate of a recent city ban on dispensaries.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-medical-marijuana-20120926,0,2760642.story?track=rss



Obama's list of broken campaign promises gets bigger and bigger.
 
irrelevant. 90% of dems will vote for Obama even if he were to start rounding up suspected domestic terrorists and detaining them indefinitely. dems and libs do not care about the law or the truth. only that their party remains in power.
 
irrelevant. 90% of dems will vote for Obama even if he were to start rounding up suspected domestic terrorists and detaining them indefinitely. dems and libs do not care about the law or the truth. only that their party remains in power.

Now apply to Repubs. He is going after us. You and I, buddy. He wants to make it seem like he cares. Vote for ObamaRomney. That's all these trolls care about. Then they have the pretense of a mandate and can blame the victims.
 
If everyone is against the drug war why do we fund it and the prisons? There has been a 'war' on drugs for decades and it will continue until the laws are changed. I can see where this is becoming one of those 'states rights' issues on the right. They don't give a damn about medical use or people so save the pearl clutching.
 
Now apply to Repubs. He is going after us. You and I, buddy. He wants to make it seem like he cares. Vote for ObamaRomney. That's all these trolls care about. Then they have the pretense of a mandate and can blame the victims.
obama and romney......dems and reps......same coin, different sides. they both mean to stomp us under their boots.
 
If everyone is against the drug war why do we fund it and the prisons? There has been a 'war' on drugs for decades and it will continue until the laws are changed. I can see where this is becoming one of those 'states rights' issues on the right. They don't give a damn about medical use or people so save the pearl clutching.
maybe you are familiar with a federal case called gonzales v. raich? a medical marijuana case dealing with an individual growing a small amount of Marijuana on their own property for their own use. the majority decided that even the personal non commercial growth and use still substantially affected interstate commerce, so banning it was well within the power of congress.

Take note of the majority justices

Majority Stevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence Scalia

Dissent O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist (part I, II), Thomas (parts I, II)
Dissent Thomas
 
Back
Top