Oh snap! Does Gini have Clarence's ear?

Taichiliberal

Shaken, not stirred!
I wonder how long it will take our resident right wing wonks and trolls to find some type of comparison within the Democratic Party?


Why Democrats should impeach Justice Clarence Thomas


Elie Mystal: Justice Thomas is lone dissenter on issues that may implicate his wife in Jan. 6
JAN. 21, 202207:47
Which brings us back to Justice Clarence Thomas. In January, The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer profiled Thomas’ wife, Ginni, a longtime conservative operative and lobbyist, and revealed how her lobbying firm was on the payroll of far-right activist Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. Gaffney and others submitted an amicus brief to the court in 2017 in support of the Trump administration’s travel ban, arguing that “the challenge of Islam must be confronted.”

Shockingly, Thomas did not recuse himself from the case given the clear financial conflict. He never even disclosed the $200,000 paid to his wife despite being required to report the source of a spouse’s income as part of his annual financial disclosures, according to The New Yorker. Thomas would later join his fellow four conservative justices in voting to uphold Trump’s shameful Muslim ban.



https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc...uld-be-impeached-n1292076?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma
 
Why do you hate white women who marry Black men, you racist?

A ridiculous question as NOTHING I'VE EVER POSTED WOULD SUGGEST, ALLUDE TO, OR STATE SUCH SENTIMENTS. Clearly, you just don't like the implications of the FACTS presented. Deal with that instead of trying to divert discussing the issue.
 
The chronology of the posts™ proves you are a racist who fears "miscegenation".

Oh well, I took you off the ignore list because I thought after a few months you matured beyond being a silly assed right wing troll with an axe to grind. Clearly, that's not the case. See you around July, bunky.
 
Oh well, I took you off the ignore list because I thought after a few months you matured beyond being a silly assed right wing troll with an axe to grind. Clearly, that's not the case. See you around July, bunky.

The chronology of the posts™ conclusively proves you are an unrepentant racist who fears "miscegenation". You disgust me.
 
The chronology of the posts™ conclusively proves Touchy-Feely Liberal is an unrepentant racist who fears "miscegenation".

He would never say that about the wife of a white Justice.

He disgusts me.
 
Clarence has spoken at rallies and conferences that his wife organized. He is as far-right crazy as she is. He votes according to his right-wing craziness.
They are both Qanan types. Clarence votes in the minority often because he does not go by the law, precedence, or the constitution. He is a horrible member of the Supremes.
 
Last edited:
The chronology of the posts™ proves you are a racist who fears "miscegenation".

Miscegenation is defined as "the interbreeding of people who are considered to be members of different races."[SUP][1][/SUP] Since Ginni and Clarence never spawned and produced hybrids, they didn't literally "miscegenate."
 
Miscegenation is defined as "the interbreeding of people who are considered to be members of different races."[SUP][1][/SUP] Since Ginni and Clarence never spawned and produced hybrids, they didn't literally "miscegenate."

Definition of miscegenation
: a mixture of races
especially : marriage, cohabitation, or sexual intercourse between a white person and a member of another race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a)
NOTE: The word miscegenation is associated especially with historical laws against interracial marriage. In the United States, such laws were declared unconstitutional in 1967.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/miscegenation

I think the term refers to interracial marriage, though with the expectation of procreation.
 
Miscegenation is defined as "the interbreeding of people who are considered to be members of different races."[SUP][1][/SUP] Since Ginni and Clarence never spawned and produced hybrids, they didn't literally "miscegenate."

The chronology of the posts™ proves that Touchy-Feely Liberal is a racist who fears "miscegenation".

The chronology of the posts™ conclusively proves you are an unrepentant racist who fears "miscegenation". You disgust me.


cmFjZS5naWY.gif
 
The chronology of the posts™ proves that Touchy-Feely Liberal is a racist who fears "miscegenation".

The chronology of the posts proves your misinterpretation of what Tai wrote in the 1st post. Nothing in the article refers to the color of their skin.

In January, The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer profiled Thomas’ wife, Ginni, a longtime conservative operative and lobbyist, and revealed how her lobbying firm was on the payroll of far-right activist Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. Gaffney and others submitted an amicus brief to the court in 2017 in support of the Trump administration’s travel ban, arguing that “the challenge of Islam must be confronted.”

Shockingly, Thomas did not recuse himself from the case given the clear financial conflict. He never even disclosed the $200,000 paid to his wife despite being required to report the source of a spouse’s income as part of his annual financial disclosures, according to The New Yorker. Thomas would later join his fellow four conservative justices in voting to uphold the shameful Muslim ban.

In February, The New York Times Magazine reported that Ginni Thomas served on the board of a secretive right-wing group called CNP Action. In November 2020, it circulated a “November ‘action steps’ document” instructing its members in the days after the election “to pressure Republican lawmakers into challenging the election results and appointing alternate slates of electors,” according to the report. But when former President Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court to block the House Jan. 6 committee from obtaining hundreds of pages of White House records from the National Archives, Thomas was the sole justice to vote against the House investigators.

Then on Monday, in an interview with a conservative blog, Ginni Thomas admitted to having attended the "Stop the Steal" rally at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, 2021. She admitted to being in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, thereby endorsing that day's Trump-led rally to overturn the election, but she claimed to have left before Trump addressed the crowd because she “got cold.”


To recap: These reports showed that the wife of a Supreme Court justice not only took undisclosed money from an activist who filed a brief in front of the court, but that she was also part of a campaign to try to overturn the 2020 election result and attended the rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol. And as Ginni Thomas herself helpfully explained in Monday’s interview: “Like so many married couples, we share many of the same ideals, principles, and aspirations for America.”

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/why-supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-could-be-impeached-n1292076?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma

 
I wonder how long it will take our resident right wing wonks and trolls to find some type of comparison within the Democratic Party?


Why Democrats should impeach Justice Clarence Thomas


Elie Mystal: Justice Thomas is lone dissenter on issues that may implicate his wife in Jan. 6
JAN. 21, 202207:47
Which brings us back to Justice Clarence Thomas. In January, The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer profiled Thomas’ wife, Ginni, a longtime conservative operative and lobbyist, and revealed how her lobbying firm was on the payroll of far-right activist Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy. Gaffney and others submitted an amicus brief to the court in 2017 in support of the Trump administration’s travel ban, arguing that “the challenge of Islam must be confronted.”

Shockingly, Thomas did not recuse himself from the case given the clear financial conflict. He never even disclosed the $200,000 paid to his wife despite being required to report the source of a spouse’s income as part of his annual financial disclosures, according to The New Yorker. Thomas would later join his fellow four conservative justices in voting to uphold Trump’s shameful Muslim ban.



https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc...uld-be-impeached-n1292076?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma

40639.jpeg
 
The chronology of the posts proves your misinterpretation of what Tai wrote in the 1st post. Nothing in the article refers to the color of their skin.

The chronology of the posts™ proves that Touchy-Feely Liberal is a racist who fears "miscegenation".

OHgxdy5qcGc
 
The chronology of the posts™ proves that Touchy-Feely Liberal is a racist who fears "miscegenation".

OHgxdy5qcGc

These are the words *he* wrote: "I wonder how long it will take our resident right wing wonks and trolls to find some type of comparison within the Democratic Party?"

I see miscegenation in that like I see dead people. :D
 
Back
Top