Given his overall performance for the day, either Garland is utterly incompetent or he's the most ill-prepared candidate for AG to sit in front of the confirmation committee in decades.
Garland answered almost everything I don't know... Here's a particularly egregious one:
Garland when asked if he would continue to criminally prosecute illegal border crossers answered "I really haven't thought about it."
WTF? Crossing the border illegally is a crime. That crime is in federal statutes. What's there to "think about" here? Is Garland retarded?
So, the OP's use of a cherry picked example is meaningless in the overall conduct of Garland in front of the committee. So far he's shown himself to be either totally incompetent, or the most disingenuous, ill-informed, and evasive person to ever seek to be AG.
That problem is yours. He was not considered for the Supremes because he is not a top-flight judge and lawyer, in spite of what rightys say. He was clear and open. He did not lie so it made Trump's uncomfortable. he knre what he could say to please everyone. The rightys wanted him to lie like Barr. Barr was a mess. Garland will have a big job cleaning it up.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.