Olbermann/Hannity - What's the Difference?

Beefy

Worst gambler ever
Someone tell me the difference between the two, besides the viewpoint. They are both, overwhelmingly dishonest partisan hacks. Prove me wrong.

Idiots.
 
Someone tell me the difference between the two, besides the viewpoint. They are both, overwhelmingly dishonest partisan hacks. Prove me wrong.

Idiots.

Olberman is a liberal so he's better. The root word of "Liberal" is "Multiple-orgasms", and you just can't disagree with that.
 
Someone tell me the difference between the two, besides the viewpoint. They are both, overwhelmingly dishonest partisan hacks. Prove me wrong.

Idiots.

HaHa, the difference is Olbermann is like Michael Savage. They will probably have a heart attack live on the air and die. The public will love when it happens. Hannity will die because he sucks. He won't get the public flameout like the other two.
 
Well they both may be partisan hacks but Olberman has at least one thing going for him, he knows something about sports.

Hannity on the other hand has two major strikes. #1. He's the poster child for pompous assess and #2 he has to be, by far and away, the dumbest TV personality in recorded history.
 
Someone tell me the difference between the two, besides the viewpoint. They are both, overwhelmingly dishonest partisan hacks. Prove me wrong.

Idiots.

I'm not familiar with Olbermann, but Hannity is a partisan hack for sure.
 
I get pissed off when I watch Hannity or O'Reilly.

I don't get pissed off when I watch Olbermann.

It doesn't have anything to do with my political leanings. Really.
 
It is kind of sad that anyone in our congress nowadays is either a Limbaugh, an O'Reilly, an Olbermann, or a southern racist (which is a pretty bipartisan group of people). Which gives credence to my idea of taking suffrage away from stupid people.
 
It is kind of sad that anyone in our congress nowadays is either a Limbaugh, an O'Reilly, an Olbermann, or a southern racist (which is a pretty bipartisan group of people). Which gives credence to my idea of taking suffrage away from stupid people.

That was my idea. Your idea was to eject them from the union.
 
That was my idea. Your idea was to eject them from the union.

While stupid people are unfortunately concentrated in rural areas, they appear in metros too from time to time. It'd be best just to send them to Mexico, but I'm alright with just taking away their voting privileges.
 
To my way of thinking people have to be stupid to live in urban areas.
They love having all the details of their lives regulated and unless in a pack are terrified.
Cannot produce their own food and route most of their income towards enriching those in the next caste up the ladder.
 
To my way of thinking people have to be stupid to live in urban areas.
They love having all the details of their lives regulated and unless in a pack are terrified.
Cannot produce their own food and route most of their income towards enriching those in the next caste up the ladder.

US, most of rural America is also like that. I don't know many people who farm. Technically I could build one if I totally needed to though in my yard, whilst a person in the big city would be restricted to their windowsill plants.
 
Actually, I set up a burn for really dumb, feminine people. A really bad burn.

Guess who fell for it?

Actually, you were sarcastic, and they didn't pick up your sarcasm.

I don't think you were setting up a burn at all.
 
Someone tell me the difference between the two, besides the viewpoint. They are both, overwhelmingly dishonest partisan hacks. Prove me wrong.

Idiots.

Olberman gets pissed off about warrantless wiretapping of american citizens, torture, lying us into war, and war profiteering.

O'Reilly gets pissed of about Wars on Christmas, gay marriage, and super bowl wardrobe malfunctions.

Big difference, for me anyway.
 
Back
Top