On the Blade Runner Curse

Minister of Truth

Practically Perfect
Here's a good article on the economics of the Blade Runner curse for certain people to ignore.

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...not-omnipotent-capitalism-ensures-competition

Jonah Goldberg said:
What explains this? Simply: capitalism itself. The Blade Runner curse isn’t real; it’s normal. The economist Joseph Schumpeter famously pointed out that monopolies can’t last forever in a free market because monopolies get ossified and overly dependent on their existing business models. Entrepreneurs and innovators figure out new techniques and technologies that run circles around the big guys. That was the whole point behind another Ridley Scott masterpiece, his 1984-themed Super Bowl commercial for Apple Computer, which symbolically dethroned IBM as the Orwellian colossus bestriding the personal-computer industry.

As Adam Smith noted in The Wealth of Nations, the only thing that can make a monopoly permanent is government, because only government can prevent the sort of innovation and competition that undermines every corporate behemoth.
 
The only thing wrong with Goldbrick's analogy involves the fallacy of the Apple Super Bowl ad.

IBM was not the Orwellian colossus bestriding the personal-computer industry in 1984. If anyone was, it was Apple.

Prior to the arrival of Apple on the scene, there really wasn't much of a personal computer industry or even much of a market.

By 1984, it was IBM who had recognized the upward trend in personal computers that Apple had started, then had to scramble to catch up.
 
With all due respect to Ridley Scott shouldn’t this be called “ Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep Curse”?

Curses need to be catchy, like the Madden Curse. Just like they named the Cubs curse after an animal, rather than the crazy Polish guy who actually worked the incantation.
 
Back
Top