Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for holding the presidency. To serve as president, one must:
● be a natural-born U.S. citizen of the United States;
● be at least 35 years old;
● be a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.
A person who meets the above qualifications would, however, still be disqualified from holding the office of president under any of the following conditions:
● Under Article I, Section 3, Clause 7, upon conviction in impeachment cases, the Senate has the option to order, by a simple majority, that an individual be forever disqualified from holding federal office, which includes that of president.
● Under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, no person who swore an oath to support the Constitution, and later rebelled against the United States, is eligible to become president. However, this disqualification can be lifted by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress.
● Under the Twenty-second Amendment, no person can be elected president more than twice. The amendment also specifies that if any eligible person serves as president or acting president for more than two years of a term for which some other eligible person was elected president, the former can only be elected president once.
● be a natural-born U.S. citizen of the United States;
● be at least 35 years old;
● be a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.
A person who meets the above qualifications would, however, still be disqualified from holding the office of president under any of the following conditions:
● Under Article I, Section 3, Clause 7, upon conviction in impeachment cases, the Senate has the option to order, by a simple majority, that an individual be forever disqualified from holding federal office, which includes that of president.
● Under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, no person who swore an oath to support the Constitution, and later rebelled against the United States, is eligible to become president. However, this disqualification can be lifted by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress.
● Under the Twenty-second Amendment, no person can be elected president more than twice. The amendment also specifies that if any eligible person serves as president or acting president for more than two years of a term for which some other eligible person was elected president, the former can only be elected president once.
Perhaps the question should be 'when was Obama born?'
By Jack Cashill
Published August 26, 2020 at 7:46p
https://www.wnd.com/2020/08/perhaps-question-obama-born/
Obama manufactured a computer-generated birth certificate years before computers were available. It was a scam from start to finish in order to detract from his presidential INELIGIBILITY. Wall-to-wall media coverage made the scam work.
NOTE: The Chicago sewer rat was American on his mother’s side. His presidential eligibility is another matter.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?114259-The-Anchor-Baby-Snivel&p=2919758#post2919758
It matters not where or when he was born. Even if the lying sack of shit was born in Kenya in 1961 as his relatives swore they witnessed —— the issue was always the definition of “natural born citizen” the Supreme Court refused —— and still refuse —— to address. In short: Obama is ineligible forever. Even if the Constitution is changed in the future it cannot retroactively make the Chicago sewer rat eligible in 2008.
Illegal aliens are criminals, but they cannot be impeached. Happily, Obama can still be impeached because he is an American citizen:
Here is where it got tricky:
“While three years ago my sister Auma introduced me before I gave a speech, today I’m really coming as a brother, as a citizen of the world, as someone with a connection to Africa to talk about the importance of what she’s doing but also to create a larger context for what’s possible,” Obama continued.
XXXXX
So, which is it – native-born son of Kenya, native-born son of Hawaii or native-born citizen of the world?
Obama says he's from Kenya, again
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/22/2018 @ 9:31 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/07/obama-says-hes-from-kenya-again/
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/22/2018 @ 9:31 pm
https://www.wnd.com/2018/07/obama-says-hes-from-kenya-again/
QUESTION: Can everyone claim American citizenship after declaring I am a citizen of the World?
Parasites, illegal aliens, and Democrats will answer YES.
Anyone with a lick of common sense will answer NO.
Conversely, can Americans claim they are citizens of the world without renouncing their citizenship? Obama is outta here if the answer is NO.
“Breathes there the man with soul so dead
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
...If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
...The wretch, concentred all in self,
... doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonored , and unsung.”
—Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832) excerpt from “The Lay of the Last Minstrel”
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
...If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
...The wretch, concentred all in self,
... doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonored , and unsung.”
—Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832) excerpt from “The Lay of the Last Minstrel”
To me, a citizen of the world is a man without country. Such men have no loyalty to their native land; so unless citizens of the world are environmental freakazoids why would anyone believe they will be loyal to the world?
Quite some time ago Edward Everett Hale (1822‚Äì1909) wrote a story about an American (a “poor creature”) who disowned the United States. Hale wrote the story “by way of showing young Americans of to-day [sic] what it is to be A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY.” For many years Hale’s story “The Man Without a Country” was a staple in our nation’s schools. Today it would be considered retardataire and as quaint as…well, as the US Constitution. The Progressives of today are all men and women without a country—“poor creatures” indeed.
“Sacred oaths” and words of honor to defend the Constitution notwithstanding, today’s politicians, judges, and top military brass largely ignore it. They have all taken the oath, so that makes them all dishonorable liars and/or cowards. Do these feckless frauds even care? Do the concepts of duty, integrity and honor mean anything to them? They probably consider such virtues to be foolishness, meaningful only to chumps and losers.
“Sacred oaths” and words of honor to defend the Constitution notwithstanding, today’s politicians, judges, and top military brass largely ignore it. They have all taken the oath, so that makes them all dishonorable liars and/or cowards. Do these feckless frauds even care? Do the concepts of duty, integrity and honor mean anything to them? They probably consider such virtues to be foolishness, meaningful only to chumps and losers.
A Man for all Treasons and the US Constitution
By Jim ONeill
March 19, 2012
http://canadafreepress.com/article/a-man-for-all-treasons-and-the-us-constitution
By Jim ONeill
March 19, 2012
http://canadafreepress.com/article/a-man-for-all-treasons-and-the-us-constitution
The question of dual citizen was also invoked:
Was young Obama Indonesian citizen
Published: 08/17/2008 at 8:18 PM
By Aaron Klein
https://www.wnd.com/2008/08/72656/
Published: 08/17/2008 at 8:18 PM
By Aaron Klein
https://www.wnd.com/2008/08/72656/
There one thing that always troubled me about dual citizenship was the repeated references to Obama’s birth in Kenya in 1961. I never understood why no one asked about British East Africa? It was not until 1963 that Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, and Zanzibar got their independence from British East Africa. To this amateur Sherlock Holmes the difference between writing Kenya, and writing British East Africa, on legal documents was akin to the police misspelling a name on a search warrant. I am not a lawyer, but I was certain somebody was going to bounce Obama’s Honolulu birth certificate out of court on a technicality. I was wrong.
Obama’s father was Kenyan. Kenya was controlled by the British as part of British East Africa; hence, Obama had dual citizenship long before he got it from Indonesia. His first duality was British and American not Indonesian and American.
There is no telling what Obama senior might have done to register baby Obama as a British subject if Obama was, indeed, born in British East Africa. To Papa Obama it might have seemed the wise thing to do at the time. It was a longshot, but the British had no reason to help Obama hide anything before or after he moved into the White House.
Other challenges questioned Obama senior, a Kenyan subject under the UK’s jurisdiction at the time of baby Obama’s birth, thus making junior a dual citizen.
Since Obama was unquestionably American, my interest in his birthplace always focused on embassy records from 1961. Since Kenya was not an independent nation at the time, I assumed the American Embassy did not deal with the territory of Kenya. That means that the pertinent records should have been filed in America Embassy archives under British East Africa.
The plot got thicker than a London fog:
Responding to a Freedom of Information Act request, the State Department has released passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama’s mother – but records for the years surrounding Obama’s 1961 birth are missing.
The State Department claims a 1980s General Services Administration directive resulted in the destruction of many passport applications and other “nonvital” passport records, including Dunham’s 1965 passport application and any other passports she may have applied for or held prior to 1965.
The State Department claims a 1980s General Services Administration directive resulted in the destruction of many passport applications and other “nonvital” passport records, including Dunham’s 1965 passport application and any other passports she may have applied for or held prior to 1965.
Oops! Obama mama passport 'destroyed'
State Department claims records gone for Stanley Ann Dunham prior to 1968
Published: 08/01/2010 at 6:28 PM
https://www.wnd.com/2010/08/186677/
State Department claims records gone for Stanley Ann Dunham prior to 1968
Published: 08/01/2010 at 6:28 PM
https://www.wnd.com/2010/08/186677/
Parenthetically, a little murder spiced up the Obama Saga:
A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.
Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal
XXXXX
The Washington Times reported April 5 that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot
The Washington Times
Saturday, April 19, 2008
https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
Was Harris’ murder related to Mama Obama traveling to Kenya on an American passport issued in her name only? I do not know the answer. I do know that Ann Dunham would have to go to the American Embassy for documentation in order to bring her newborn baby back to the U.S. —— as well as get written permission from British East Africa to leave the country with an infant British subject. It was as simple as that.
I do not know how records are stored in State Department archives. Are the records involving Kenya after 1963 stored in a different building than the records from British East Africa prior before 1963? Regardless of where they are archived locating embassy records should have sent an army of investigative journalists looking for the truth. It did not. Why not?
1. They were too busy engaging in the conspiracy that elected Obama.
2. Heaven forbid that an ounce of truth would have prevented the first black president from winning the election in 2008. Nobody wanted the truth.
3. Finding passport records was of paramount importance if the greatest presidential conspiracy ever executed was put to the smell test.
NOTE: Media conspiracy to elect Senile Joe Biden is laughable when it is compared to the conspiracy that elected Obama.
While the lying sack of shit’s stench was blowing across the land, it occurred to me that there might also be some proof of Obama’s birthplace in the British archives in London from 1961. Logically, mama and papa would of have registered their bouncing baby boy at the British Embassy in British East Africa. If so, there was a good chance a few staff personnel might still be still alive. I cannot believe that a white American woman showing up with a black baby was commonplace in 1961. They would remember it. The same is true of American Embassy personnel.
Port of entry records —— international airports and seaports —— also offered an avenue to the truth. The time period in question made the search an easy task. Nobody ever looked as far as I know.
Were it only a matter of records controlled by the government in Kenya, you can be sure that President Obama had those records destroyed. That is why nobody bothered to look for the hospital records where Obama’s paternal grandmother said she witnessed his birth. Granny Obama was told to button her lip.
The dual citizenship thing probably would not standup in court, but if embassy records prove that Obama was born in British East Africa those records would also prove without a doubt that he was lying about being born in Hawaii.
Last edited: