Only 16% Believe George W. Bush Isn't Hiding Something about the Tragedy on 9/11

Prakosh

Senior Member
Apparently the number of people who think Bush is hiding something about 9-11 is about half his support (16 percent vs. 33 percent). I remain confused as to how a person can believe that Bush is hiding somethingabout 9-11 yet still give him a positive approval rating. In any event, that they can and that they do, is yet another indication of the fickleness of the American public and another reason why I don't count on electoral politics to change this country.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research
Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence



- Many adults in the United States believe the current federal government has not been completely forthcoming on the issue of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to a poll by the New York Times and CBS News. 53 per cent of respondents think the Bush administration is hiding something, and 28 per cent believe it is lying.

Only 16 per cent of respondents say the government headed by U.S. president George W. Bush is telling the truth on what it knew prior to the terrorist attacks, down five points since May 2002.

Al-Qaeda operatives hijacked and crashed four airplanes in the U.S. on Sept. 11, 2001, killing nearly 3,000 people. In October, after Afghanistan’s Taliban regime refused to hand over al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the U.S. launched the war on terrorism.

On Aug. 6, 2001, a Presidential Daily Briefing titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." mentioned "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."

On May 17, 2002, Bush discussed the situation, saying, "The American people know this about me, and my national security team, and my administration: Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to kill on that fateful morning, I would have done everything in my power to protect the American people."

On Sept. 11, Bush referred to the attacks, saying, "Five years after 9/11, our enemies have not succeeded in launching another attack on our soil, but they’ve not been idle. Al-Qaeda and those inspired by its hateful ideology have carried out terrorist attacks in more than two dozen nations. And just last month, they were foiled in a plot to blow up passenger planes headed for the United States. They remain determined to attack America and kill our citizens—and we are determined to stop them."


Complete Poll Results Here
 
I think most just misread "Americans Question Bush on 9/11 Intelligence"
as "Americans Question Bush on Intelligence"
 
Well, 16% is smallish but I thought at least one Republican leaning poster here would jump in and say he told all and he was completely forthright etc. But that hasn't been the case, I guess we may assume from this lack of engagement that the Republican leaning posters here all agree that he is holding something back and that he knew more than he is willing to tell. In fact, I think that one can see that Bush has lost so much support that people are generally unwilling to support his obfuscations anymore.
 
It may be that most realize that sometimes things are actually classified for a good reason and that the Government, including Bush, may hold some of those things back...

But heck, you can interpret it in your head whichever way makes you feel best, I guess.
 
It may be that most realize that sometimes things are actually classified for a good reason and that the Government, including Bush, may hold some of those things back...

But heck, you can interpret it in your head whichever way makes you feel best, I guess.

Yeah, saving us from ourselves. And making sure that we don't know too much. I guess that is why all those terrorists stories about the terrorists who were going to mix energy drinks with lipstick and moisturizer disappeared from the news too. We just can't have too much information. Enough to make us scared shitless but beyond that we must be protected from the highly dangerous aspects of too much information. Just one question before I go: Do you think we are going to have another fatal or near fatal or just possibly fatal terrorist attack or terrorist threat uncovered before the election???
 
Yeah, saving us from ourselves. And making sure that we don't know too much. I guess that is why all those terrorists stories about the terrorists who were going to mix energy drinks with lipstick and moisturizer disappeared from the news too. We just can't have too much information. Enough to make us scared shitless but beyond that we must be protected from the highly dangerous aspects of too much information. Just one question before I go: Do you think we are going to have another fatal or near fatal or just possibly fatal terrorist attack or terrorist threat uncovered before the election???
I don't really think so. I do think that you think that they will. Last time the prediction was gas prices going down, they didn't. Now that that has happened on this one it is supposed terrorist attack announcements...

Whatever.

Do you suppose that if there really was one you would still attempt to use the same line the Rs used on Clinton? "Distraction, wag the dog, blah, blah..."
 
but gas prices did go down before the election.
Not the last one... They stayed at the average. They dipped then rose before the election time. This time they did, but long enough before that holding that in the mind of short-memory americans wasn't feasible. They needed something new...
 
Oh, sorry I was referring to this one.
Well anyway, I agree that some things about 911 are better left unsaid.
However with that siad, I believe the 16% item comes from the people losing trust in GWB and this administration as a whole.
I mean what reason do we have to believe the man ?
 
Oh, sorry I was referring to this one.
Well anyway, I agree that some things about 911 are better left unsaid.
However with that siad, I believe the 16% item comes from the people losing trust in GWB and this administration as a whole.
I mean what reason do we have to believe the man ?
I don't think so, unless somehow you believe that those who only "somewhat disapprove" are all believing he had something to do with it...

I think that this particular one is simply because we don't trust the government pretty much whomever is running it.

You cannot have 42% approval and also have only 16% in this poll and not have some overlap there... Also the "somewhat" crowd is less unhappy, they'd be moreso if they thought there was something nefarious hidden.

Hiding things is a government norm. It doesn't necessarily mean it is something evil.
 
42% approval, I though it was more like 34%... Well anyway it all has a lot to do with the questions asked in the poll now doesn't it ?
 
42% approval, I though it was more like 34%... Well anyway it all has a lot to do with the questions asked in the poll now doesn't it ?
I just go off the fact that I would be in the "somewhat disapprove" crowd. They'd count me in the "disapproval rating" but I don't believe that they have something nefarious they are hiding about that day while I believe that they are hiding some things.
 
I just go off the fact that I would be in the "somewhat disapprove" crowd. They'd count me in the "disapproval rating" but I don't believe that they have something nefarious they are hiding about that day while I believe that they are hiding some things.

I have to agree with that statement Damo, except that I am in the strongly disaprove of Bush group.
My point was that Bush has lost the trust of the people and therefore is an impotent leader or worse.
 
Back
Top