Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.

bhaktajan

Hare Krishna Templar
Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
It should be obvious to anyone what our next president will have to deal with.

Our next president will have no grounding in belief.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next president will have no loyalty.
Our next president will have no curiosity.
Our next president will have no empathy and Our next president will have no understanding.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next pre demand personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation.
Our next president will have only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else.
Our next president will only want is exercise more and more personal power.
There’s something of an industry devoted to the psyche of Our next president.

Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
Our next president will not read, and appear to be ignorant of history (American, European, Middle-Eastern, Asian, whatever) and cannot control his Twitter finger.

Our next president will have a lack of concern for consistency
(which CNN gleefully exposes through side-by-side video clips of his self-contradictions),
Our next president will be sensitive to criticism, bullying and foul language,
and obsession with media coverage, and it’s no wonder.
Is Our next president to be narcissistic—meaning obsessed with his
personal image and reputation? Surely, yes. Does he suffer from ADD?

Our next president will speak with a short attention span.
Our next president will be a sociopathic—given the apparent lack of concern for others
and how they might perceive his (unwanted) attentions?
Our next president could he be suffering from early stage Alzheimer’s?
Only a brain autopsy will tell.
To date, no psychological or neurological category seems to explain or contain Our next president.

Here’s a different hypothesis: what if Our next president simply lacks depth,
including the capacity for inwardness or self-reflection?
Gradually, mass CCTV will produce an ethos of “transparency,” which is a form of surveillance,
in which Our next president surrenders every aspect of life to the scrutiny of millions of
viewers who subscribe to Our next president’s personal site.

The attention Our next president will receive will be intoxicating, to the point that Our next president betray friends to an audience of global viewers by tracking him down in real time and hounding him to his death.

As viewers, we know that there is something wrong with Our next president’s uncritical exposure of one’s personal life, but Our next president will not.
Eventually, a mole in the government informs the public of the global Surveillance of its founders, but the outcome is unclear.
In the final scenes, we Our next president waving to the drone that continues to spy from the cloudless sky above.

Our next president poses questions about how much we want our personal information to be available to anyone and everyone via the Internet and the agreements Our next president sign without thinking that enable access to them.

Our next president will be even more dystopian than fiction.
Our next president will be uneasy about the life Our next president has chosen. These are represented by moments of profound disorientation—a dark night of the soul—which manages to dismiss through a kind of manic immersion in social media activity.

Our next president will put his finger on something we don’t want to think about to avoid the implications of immersion in the “transparency”.
Only a renewed frenzy of social media activity restores Our next president equilibrium.

Our next president gleans information about the world and his fellow human beings from “the shows,” meaning the flat screen of his TV. As a consequence, he appears to have developed a reactive personality style —meaning that he responds naively to what he sees or hears without thinking before he speaks or acts.

There are ways to describe such a personality structure in contemporary psychoanalytic theory.

They involve a failure to achieve the stage of development in which we come to an awareness that the “good” and “bad” elements that we project into our environment live within ourselves.
Lacking this, we tend to spew our anxieties into the world around us, dividing it into those who love us and those who hate us.

Another developmental model attributes the inability to understand the mental state of oneself or others to repeated failures of attunement between an infant and its caregivers.

Life is easier, better, and more fulfilling when privacy is all but eradicated –hoping one day private thoughts are able to become public knowledge as well –in order to maintain inner equilibrium —which might also help to explain the need for Presidents to hold campaign rallies long after elections end.

Yet we might also infer from this that Our next president will not have an inner life, one in which he experiences both self-love and self-hate.
In the dark before dawn, alone with his iPhone, does Our next president succumb to inner demons?

If so, Our next president’s early morning Twitter rants may represent a desperate plea to be seen, heard, and responded to—hence stabilized and affirmed.

Then again, maybe Our next president will just be shallow.
What do you think?
 
Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
It should be obvious to anyone what our next president will have to deal with.

Our next president will have no grounding in belief.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next president will have no loyalty.
Our next president will have no curiosity.
Our next president will have no empathy and Our next president will have no understanding.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next pre demand personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation.
Our next president will have only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else.
Our next president will only want is exercise more and more personal power.
There’s something of an industry devoted to the psyche of Our next president.

Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
Our next president will not read, and appear to be ignorant of history (American, European, Middle-Eastern, Asian, whatever) and cannot control his Twitter finger.

Our next president will have a lack of concern for consistency
(which CNN gleefully exposes through side-by-side video clips of his self-contradictions),
Our next president will be sensitive to criticism, bullying and foul language,
and obsession with media coverage, and it’s no wonder.
Is Our next president to be narcissistic—meaning obsessed with his
personal image and reputation? Surely, yes. Does he suffer from ADD?

Our next president will speak with a short attention span.
Our next president will be a sociopathic—given the apparent lack of concern for others
and how they might perceive his (unwanted) attentions?
Our next president could he be suffering from early stage Alzheimer’s?
Only a brain autopsy will tell.
To date, no psychological or neurological category seems to explain or contain Our next president.

Here’s a different hypothesis: what if Our next president simply lacks depth,
including the capacity for inwardness or self-reflection?
Gradually, mass CCTV will produce an ethos of “transparency,” which is a form of surveillance,
in which Our next president surrenders every aspect of life to the scrutiny of millions of
viewers who subscribe to Our next president’s personal site.

The attention Our next president will receive will be intoxicating, to the point that Our next president betray friends to an audience of global viewers by tracking him down in real time and hounding him to his death.

As viewers, we know that there is something wrong with Our next president’s uncritical exposure of one’s personal life, but Our next president will not.
Eventually, a mole in the government informs the public of the global Surveillance of its founders, but the outcome is unclear.
In the final scenes, we Our next president waving to the drone that continues to spy from the cloudless sky above.

Our next president poses questions about how much we want our personal information to be available to anyone and everyone via the Internet and the agreements Our next president sign without thinking that enable access to them.

Our next president will be even more dystopian than fiction.
Our next president will be uneasy about the life Our next president has chosen. These are represented by moments of profound disorientation—a dark night of the soul—which manages to dismiss through a kind of manic immersion in social media activity.

Our next president will put his finger on something we don’t want to think about to avoid the implications of immersion in the “transparency”.
Only a renewed frenzy of social media activity restores Our next president equilibrium.

Our next president gleans information about the world and his fellow human beings from “the shows,” meaning the flat screen of his TV. As a consequence, he appears to have developed a reactive personality style —meaning that he responds naively to what he sees or hears without thinking before he speaks or acts.

There are ways to describe such a personality structure in contemporary psychoanalytic theory.

They involve a failure to achieve the stage of development in which we come to an awareness that the “good” and “bad” elements that we project into our environment live within ourselves.
Lacking this, we tend to spew our anxieties into the world around us, dividing it into those who love us and those who hate us.

Another developmental model attributes the inability to understand the mental state of oneself or others to repeated failures of attunement between an infant and its caregivers.

Life is easier, better, and more fulfilling when privacy is all but eradicated –hoping one day private thoughts are able to become public knowledge as well –in order to maintain inner equilibrium —which might also help to explain the need for Presidents to hold campaign rallies long after elections end.

Yet we might also infer from this that Our next president will not have an inner life, one in which he experiences both self-love and self-hate.
In the dark before dawn, alone with his iPhone, does Our next president succumb to inner demons?

If so, Our next president’s early morning Twitter rants may represent a desperate plea to be seen, heard, and responded to—hence stabilized and affirmed.

Then again, maybe Our next president will just be shallow.
What do you think?

Well...I hope that made you feel better.

A really good shit in the early morning would probably work better!
 
Our next President will be Donald Trump. Let the leftist tears flow baby! :rofl2:

2c625674f5922689c6c8e1ff19ef6bc9.png
 
Well...I hope that made you feel better.

A really good shit in the early morning would probably work better!

Holy Cow Franky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We are so in-simpatico!!

My post was indeed a pile that percolated and came from deep in my viscera.

So you too see the steam rise from it !?!





PS: Is there anything else they we eat that's named "Doodle"

PPS: "Stinky" Cheese Doodles would be more expensive than regular Cheese Doodles.
 
I mean before the end of this term!

Yes, I supposed that was what you meant.

One foot on a banana peel, I am prompted to make these tangential comments:



MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
The girl to the left in your avatar looks like a mid-teen Anne Frank ---with large breasts. I never noticed hers...I've never seen...is this Anne Frank in your avatar?
DYK:

Mel Brooks has given a well known definition of Comedy.

Mel Brooks said:
"When a man slips on a banana, that's not funny; but when a man slips on a banana, falls into a hole and dies, that's funny"

TV's Home Funniest Videos are chuck full of folks falling [imo 99% of whom went to emergency hospital visits].

TV comedies show laughing at the expense of the esteem of another's pathos.

Even TV's Seinfeld's last show [imo terrible] had the main character's being called to answer in court all their trespasses against others
---even though those trespasses made the show what it is today, famous & classic and of the highest calibre.

An "AVATAR" is a plenary expansion of Maha-Vishnu....Krishna, being the source of Maha-Vishnu...thus all avatars are expressions of Krishna's omnipresence in forms taken in an incarnation's pastime. Ie: the OT Burning Bush, Buddha etc.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

-end of my tangential comments-
 
Last edited:
Yes, I supposed that was what you meant.

One foot on a banana peel, I am prompted to make these tangential comments:



MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
The girl to the left in your avatar looks like a mid-teen Anne Frank ---with large breasts. I never noticed hers...I've never seen...is this Anne Frank in your avatar?
DYK:

Mel Brooks has given a well known definition of Comedy.

Mel Brooks said:
"When a man slips on a banana, that's not funny; but when a man slips on a banana, falls into a hole and dies, that's funny"

TV's Home Funniest Videos are chuck full of folks falling [imo 99% of whom went to emergency hospital visits].

TV comedies show laughing at the expense of the esteem of another's pathos.

Even TV's Seinfeld's last show [imo terrible] had the main character's being called to answer in court all their trespasses against others
---even though those trespasses made the show what it is today, famous & classic and of the highest calibre.

An "AVATAR" is a plenary expansion of Maha-Vishnu....Krishna, being the source of Maha-Vishnu...thus all avatars are expressions of Krishna's omnipresence in forms taken in an incarnation's pastime. Ie: the OT Burning Bush, Buddha etc.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

-end of my tangential comments-

The two beautiful young ladies in my Avatar are Margot Frank on the left,and her younger sister Anne Frank
 
I copy/parsed and pasted the OP from this link:

What Is Wrong With Donald Trump?
He is an executive-in-chief like no other.
Posted Jul 13, 2017

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/minding-memory/201707/what-is-wrong-donald-trump


Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
It should be obvious to anyone what our next president will have to deal with.

Our next president will have no grounding in belief.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next president will have no loyalty.
Our next president will have no curiosity.
Our next president will have no empathy and Our next president will have no understanding.
Our next president will have no core philosophy.
Our next president will have no morals.
Our next pre demand personal loyalty and not loyalty to the nation.
Our next president will have only core belief is in his own superiority to everyone else.
Our next president will only want is exercise more and more personal power.
There’s something of an industry devoted to the psyche of Our next president.

Our next president will be an executive-in-chief like no other.
Our next president will not read, and appear to be ignorant of history (American, European, Middle-Eastern, Asian, whatever) and cannot control his Twitter finger.

Our next president will have a lack of concern for consistency
(which CNN gleefully exposes through side-by-side video clips of his self-contradictions),
Our next president will be sensitive to criticism, bullying and foul language,
and obsession with media coverage, and it’s no wonder.
Is Our next president to be narcissistic—meaning obsessed with his
personal image and reputation? Surely, yes. Does he suffer from ADD?

Our next president will speak with a short attention span.
Our next president will be a sociopathic—given the apparent lack of concern for others
and how they might perceive his (unwanted) attentions?
Our next president could he be suffering from early stage Alzheimer’s?
Only a brain autopsy will tell.
To date, no psychological or neurological category seems to explain or contain Our next president.

Here’s a different hypothesis: what if Our next president simply lacks depth,
including the capacity for inwardness or self-reflection?
Gradually, mass CCTV will produce an ethos of “transparency,” which is a form of surveillance,
in which Our next president surrenders every aspect of life to the scrutiny of millions of
viewers who subscribe to Our next president’s personal site.

The attention Our next president will receive will be intoxicating, to the point that Our next president betray friends to an audience of global viewers by tracking him down in real time and hounding him to his death.

As viewers, we know that there is something wrong with Our next president’s uncritical exposure of one’s personal life, but Our next president will not.
Eventually, a mole in the government informs the public of the global Surveillance of its founders, but the outcome is unclear.
In the final scenes, we Our next president waving to the drone that continues to spy from the cloudless sky above.

Our next president poses questions about how much we want our personal information to be available to anyone and everyone via the Internet and the agreements Our next president sign without thinking that enable access to them.

Our next president will be even more dystopian than fiction.
Our next president will be uneasy about the life Our next president has chosen. These are represented by moments of profound disorientation—a dark night of the soul—which manages to dismiss through a kind of manic immersion in social media activity.

Our next president will put his finger on something we don’t want to think about to avoid the implications of immersion in the “transparency”.
Only a renewed frenzy of social media activity restores Our next president equilibrium.

Our next president gleans information about the world and his fellow human beings from “the shows,” meaning the flat screen of his TV. As a consequence, he appears to have developed a reactive personality style —meaning that he responds naively to what he sees or hears without thinking before he speaks or acts.

There are ways to describe such a personality structure in contemporary psychoanalytic theory.

They involve a failure to achieve the stage of development in which we come to an awareness that the “good” and “bad” elements that we project into our environment live within ourselves.
Lacking this, we tend to spew our anxieties into the world around us, dividing it into those who love us and those who hate us.

Another developmental model attributes the inability to understand the mental state of oneself or others to repeated failures of attunement between an infant and its caregivers.

Life is easier, better, and more fulfilling when privacy is all but eradicated –hoping one day private thoughts are able to become public knowledge as well –in order to maintain inner equilibrium —which might also help to explain the need for Presidents to hold campaign rallies long after elections end.

Yet we might also infer from this that Our next president will not have an inner life, one in which he experiences both self-love and self-hate.
In the dark before dawn, alone with his iPhone, does Our next president succumb to inner demons?

If so, Our next president’s early morning Twitter rants may represent a desperate plea to be seen, heard, and responded to—hence stabilized and affirmed.

Then again, maybe Our next president will just be shallow.
What do you think?

So this article was about a prediction that was printed long after the facts were already occurring
 
Back
Top