Pastor Wright

gonzojournals

Better than You
Just made this thread to comment on how hilarious it is to read Cypress talking about how an argument is sound because it was rooted in the Bible.


I think we all know that two things would be different if Barack Obama were not involved with Pastor Wright--- first of all, no one would give a shit what he said, because no one would care who he is...secondly, he would be dismissed as a fundamentalist and the typical tirades about how awful/contradictory/hypocritical/outdated the Bible is would begin.


But thanks again for making me smile.
 
Just made this thread to comment on how hilarious it is to read Cypress talking about how an argument is sound because it was rooted in the Bible.


I think we all know that two things would be different if Barack Obama were not involved with Pastor Wright--- first of all, no one would give a shit what he said, because no one would care who he is...secondly, he would be dismissed as a fundamentalist and the typical tirades about how awful/contradictory/hypocritical/outdated the Bible is would begin.


But thanks again for making me smile.

Cypress isn't worried or talking about Pastor Wright. He's worried about Tibet.
 
Cypress isn't worried or talking about Pastor Wright. He's worried about Tibet.

In the other thread he is praising (or posting the praises) of "sound theological argument" and comments that are "rooted in the bible" (if I remember the quote correctly).

Let's just sit a moment to appreciate the hypocrisy.
 
Just made this thread to comment on how hilarious it is to read Cypress talking about how an argument is sound because it was rooted in the Bible.


I think we all know that two things would be different if Barack Obama were not involved with Pastor Wright--- first of all, no one would give a shit what he said, because no one would care who he is...secondly, he would be dismissed as a fundamentalist and the typical tirades about how awful/contradictory/hypocritical/outdated the Bible is would begin.


But thanks again for making me smile.

Pastor wright is good for the heart. The more you see, the more you fart.
 
Nope, I think Obama's preacher is an idiot, and I think Obama is an idiot for believing in religion.

Thank you for that consistency.


I am still religious, of course, but I think they are idiots for different reasons.


I mean, how many crazy white fundamentalists have said similar things and been skewered, but now we are supposed to try to see things from his perspective (and also suddenly become tolerant of religion) because a member of his flock needs to be president.
 
But, to be honest, about his comments themselves, I could really care less. It's the presence of religion that irks me most.

Well, at least you still hate religion. You aren't like the Cyprisses of this country, talking about the evils of Christianity out of one side of their mouths and then using the other side to praise Wright's comments as "biblical".
 
Thank you for that consistency.


I am still religious, of course, but I think they are idiots for different reasons.


I mean, how many crazy white fundamentalists have said similar things and been skewered, but now we are supposed to try to see things from his perspective (and also suddenly become tolerant of religion) because a member of his flock needs to be president.

Hmmmm...

His crazy comments were crazy to the black people as Falwell is to us. I still think he's an idiot. But it's like how I would defend Muslims against attacks by Christians here, yet if I were a in Kuwait, I would be defending Christianity from the Muslims. You're both very unfair to each other.
 
Well, at least you still hate religion. You aren't like the Cyprisses of this country, talking about the evils of Christianity out of one side of their mouths and then using the other side to praise Wright's comments as "biblical".

Cypriss is a smug idiot, who often praises liberal Christian preachers as "TRUE CHRISTIANS" and then attacks religion. Partisan hackery. In my view, the bible is pretty vague, and open to interpretation, so either side is as valid, or about as valid, as each other. It's one of the reasons I believe it's flawed, because it's so vague as to be meangingless.
 
Back
Top