"Payroll Fairness Act"

cawacko

Well-known member
Absolutely and completely unworkable in practice, but that doesn't matter to them; all that matters is that they can point at all the Senators and Congressmen who (quite correctly) vote against it and say "See, there's a War on Women, they voted against equal pay!" It's mindless, silly, and potentially disastrous to businesses, but it's a political freebie for them, so they don't care.


Mikulski’s ‘Paycheck Fairness Act’ Would Allow Employees to Discuss Salaries


A ‘Paycheck Fairness Act’ introduced in Congress last week would require employers to show pay disparity is related to job-performance and prohibit employer retaliation for sharing salary information with coworkers.

Senator Barbara A. Mikulski and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, both Democrats, said their legislation is aimed at closing the pay gap between men and women and would also address loopholes in the 1963 Equal Pay Act.

Currently, the law allows employers to sue or otherwise punish employees for sharing their salary information and women still make just 77 cents on their male counterpart’s dollar, according to Sen. Mikulski’s office.

In President Barack Obama’s Inaugural address on Jan. 21, he said a priority in his current term would be effectively closing the pay gap. During the first few weeks of his first term, Obama’s signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which overturned the 180-day statute of limitations for women to contest pay discrimination.

Mikulski and DeLauro said the Paycheck Fairness Act would also allow women to seek punitive damages for pay discrimination, establish a grant program to strengthen salary negotiation and other workplace skills and require the Department of Labor to enhance outreach and training efforts to eliminate pay disparities.


http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013...ct-would-allow-employees-to-discuss-salaries/
 
The whole "women make $.77 less than men" is a lie and I can prove it

If it were true that employers could get the same exact work for 23% less, they would hire all women and not hire men.

Stuff like this happens when you have idiots who understand ZERO about economics screwing around with the free market.

But Cawacko is right. This is just to revive the whole War on Women meme
 
The whole "women make $.77 less than men" is a lie and I can prove it

If it were true that employers could get the same exact work for 23% less, they would hire all women and not hire men.

Stuff like this happens when you have idiots who understand ZERO about economics screwing around with the free market.

But Cawacko is right. This is just to revive the whole War on Women meme

Probably the most convoluted reasoning I've ever read on this forum. And, trust me, I thought I'd read it all...
 
Back
Top