Pentagon says ‘no corroborating’ evidence to stand up NYT report on Russian bounties

dukkha

Verified User
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pe...ce-to-stand-up-nyt-report-on-russian-bounties
The Defense Department said late Monday that there is “no corroborating evidence” to support the explosive New York Times report last week that said the Russian military offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

The report sent shock waves through Washington and prompted President Trump to outright deny knowing anything about the intel cited in the report.

“To date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open-source reports. Regardless, we always take the safety and security of our forces in Afghanistan—and around the world—most seriously and therefore continuously adopt measures to prevent harm from potential threats,” Jonathan Hoffman, the chief Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement.

The New York Times, citing unnamed officials, reported Friday that it is believed that some “Islamist militants” or “criminal elements” collected payouts. The report pointed out that 20 Americans were killed there in 2019. It was not clear if any of those deaths were the result of a bounty.
~~
2 US deaths this year

The Taliban want us out of there, and we want out.
But a condition of negotiation is they gotta stop killing US during withdrawl

The Taliban have largely laid off the killing.Trump is pulling out 4k more this fall.
That's 4k coming home from a futile mission. Praise Trump. He knows what he's doing
 
The information coming out is from multiple sources and is very specific. This happened. Denying it is just making another excuse for the incompetent boob in the White House.
 
I’ll wait for the investigation to be completed. Spokes people often lie in Trump’s administration.
 
The information coming out is from multiple sources and is very specific. This happened. Denying it is just making another excuse for the incompetent boob in the White House.
what "sources"
and just because it's briefed doesn't make it true. It defies logic ( not your strong point) since Russia wants us out

It made it to the NSC, the NSC leaked like they always do - but it's not corroborated at all
 
More and more people are saying Trump was given the information. It is such a huge event, that it is logical that it would be in the briefings. However, we all know Trump does not read them. briefings are not just a list of proven facts, but rumors and stories that require the Prez's attention. Trump was informed.
 
Yeah, this is bullshit. White House intelligence officials say so.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/30/poli...enials-trump-briefed-russia-bounty/index.html

So which is it? He wasn't briefed, or he was briefed, and he didn't believe the allegations?

You're just sucking the Trump Admin's dick by repeating their logically inconsistent damage-control bullshit.
you're such an asshat. have you bothered to look? There was no corroboration - NONE
Not 1 detail, not one fact, not 1 name, not any examples -nothing.


It's an airball, and as such does not belong in a briefing.. It got to the NSC level but because it's really nothing more then a rumor was never briefed to Trump
 
Back
Top