PETA Membership composition

uscitizen

uscitizen

Villified User
I wonder about the membership makeup of PETA members. I don't figure there are too many people in there that grew up on farms, mostly city folks I suspect....
 
I have no idea. Peta folks can be just as zealous as islamofascists and christofacists though.
 
uscitizen said:
worse LadyT, neither of those groups wanted to make it illegal for me to drink Cows milk.
Click to expand...

Its interesting. Extremes of all of those groups can be overbearing, violent, judgemental and want to force you into thinking that their belief system is superior to yours. It just highlights that religion isn't the problem its those individual who want to force it down your throats that cause a lot of the problems in the world.
 
bob said:
scince is a tool that is also abused in the same way
Click to expand...

No, Science is the enemy of Religion it topples their temples.
Science is the search for truth and understanding of the truth. Religion is clearly the continuation of unprovable faith based beliefs.
 
uscitizen said:
No, Science is the enemy of Religion it topples their temples.
Science is the search for truth and understanding of the truth. Religion is clearly the continuation of unprovable faith based beliefs.
Click to expand...

well, scince, can be abused and used biasly... look at the globalwarming debate... look at how al gore missuses scince... just as bad if not worse then religion, atleast religion is based on belife... scince is based on fact
 
uscitizen said:
No, Science is the enemy of Religion it topples their temples.
Science is the search for truth and understanding of the truth. Religion is clearly the continuation of unprovable faith based beliefs.
Click to expand...

and just because one is the oppisite of the other dosnt mean that it is absoulute
 
No it is not absolute, just absolute as we understand the facts at this point. and we sure don't understand how everything works yet.

the global warming controversy illustrates that point perfectly, we do not yet fully understand how our earth works and what our impact on it's working is.
But because we do not yet fully understand it is that reason enough to ignore it ?
 
"Its interesting. Extremes of all of those groups can be overbearing, violent, judgemental and want to force you into thinking that their belief system is superior to yours. It just highlights that religion isn't the problem its those individual who want to force it down your throats that cause a lot of the problems in the world."

AMEN.
 
bob said:
well, scince, can be abused and used biasly... look at the globalwarming debate... look at how al gore missuses scince... just as bad if not worse then religion, atleast religion is based on belife... scince is based on fact
Click to expand...

And what, pray tell, did you specifically find "biased" or what did he do in the film that you felt was a misrepresentation of the facts?
 
WAIT a minute... did someone actually WATCH that propaganda piece? If someone did AND stayed awake through Al Bores lecture... I am truly impressed.
 
LadyT said:
And what, pray tell, did you specifically find "biased" or what did he do in the film that you felt was a misrepresentation of the facts?
Click to expand...

i havent seen his movie... i have it.. and plan on it... just havent had the time.

but anyway... he used only the scince that would fit his idea on what is happening, like the facts that were uncoverd from icecores... gore would only the facts that tend to agree that we are the major cause...
 
I did not rent it, most or part of it was on LInkTV or PBS one I forget which.
I sure was not going to rent or buy it :)
 
bob said:
i havent seen his movie... i have it.. and plan on it... just havent had the time.

but anyway... he used only the scince that would fit his idea on what is happening, like the facts that were uncoverd from icecores... gore would only the facts that tend to agree that we are the major cause...
Click to expand...
I was watching a scientist from Australia who made a larger, and time-accurate, graph on the comparison to warming and CO2 and it shows that CO2 rises AFTER the warming and the connection is spurious at best.

It's like saying that Lung Cancer causes smoking....
 
Damocles said:
I was watching a scientist from Australia who made a larger, and time-accurate, graph on the comparison to warming and CO2 and it shows that CO2 rises AFTER the warming and the connection is spurious at best.

It's like saying that Lung Cancer causes smoking....
Click to expand...

thats right on.... the biggest scourse od CO is the ocaen, water vapor... so yes as the climet get warmer, the more CO is produced.

thats just like the hole in the ozone over antartica... most people think that humans are a fault, but in reality its a seasonal ocurrance. it opens up every year around the same time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top