This could be the end of JPP as we know it.
(for further information, contact the Word Police at the Ministry of Thought)
but talking about sex with children is perfectly fine, for that " texting" pervert
No, we ban people for doing that. Public figures can be discussed if it isn’t too lewd.but talking about sex with children is perfectly fine, for that " texting" pervert
No, we ban people for doing that. Public figures can be discussed if it isn’t too lewd.
We usually don’t delete threads, but the thread originator seems to thumb his nose at the rules of the board and I’m tired of his trolling. We overlook a lot of abuses, but sometimes you just have to lay the hammer down.This could be the end of JPP as we know it.
(for further information, contact the Word Police at the Ministry of Thought)
No, as long as they don’t break the rules.As long as the discussion about those political figures is something you agree with or support.
You can discuss it without being graphic.If it WASN'T 'lewd', ... why would we discuss it?
We usually don’t delete threads, but the thread originator seems to thumb his nose at the rules of the board and I’m tired of his trolling. We overlook a lot of abuses, but sometimes you just have to lay the hammer down.
Huh?(sigh) Are you sure this has nothing to do with Guno being Black ... AND Jewish ???
No, as long as they don’t break the rules.
We usually don’t delete threads, but the thread originator seems to thumb his nose at the rules of the board and I’m tired of his trolling. We overlook a lot of abuses, but sometimes you just have to lay the hammer down.
You can discuss it without being graphic.
This could be the end of JPP as we know it.
(for further information, contact the Word Police at the Ministry of Thought)
Huh?
Lol, this wasn’t a 12b violation.--->"Prendergast is whackin his kraken".
Yeah. This is MORE GRAPHIC than most of us can take. Thanks.
I'm missing something.
Yes. But not the first time. Right. (?)