January 14, 2008
The corporate media have put the freeze on Edwards since the beginning of his campaign, even though he consistently performs better than idiots and neocons like Fred Thompson, Guilliani, and Romney. Why? Because Edwards is a threat to corporate duopoly and unmitigated corporate influence in Washington.
Hey, I can wish, can't I?
The Polls You Won’t Hear Much About: Who's the strongest Democratic candidate in a general election? Edwards.
.
The corporate media have put the freeze on Edwards since the beginning of his campaign, even though he consistently performs better than idiots and neocons like Fred Thompson, Guilliani, and Romney. Why? Because Edwards is a threat to corporate duopoly and unmitigated corporate influence in Washington.
For the Blowhards Who Insist It's a Two-Way Race...
David Sirota
For those of you who think the Democratic presidential nomination fight is just a two-way race between Obama and Clinton, check out this brand new poll from the Reno Gazette-Journal. Yup, that's right - it shows the Nevada caucus race a three-way, dead heat with John Edwards right in the mix.
For those of you who think the Democratic presidential nomination fight is just a two-way race between Obama and Clinton, check out this brand new poll from the Reno Gazette-Journal. Yup, that's right - it shows the Nevada caucus race a three-way, dead heat with John Edwards right in the mix.
Interestingly, this poll comes right on the heels of the Establishment viciously ratcheting up its angry attacks on the Edwards candidacy. Late last week, we saw a Reuters story headlined "Corporate Elite Fear Candidate Edwards" detailing how Wall Street moneymen and K Street lobbyists are frightened about Edwards populist, power-challenging message against greed and corruption. We also saw self-anointed Democratic "expert" Lawrence O'Donnell pen a fulminating screed demanding Edwards get out of the race - not surprising coming from a man who made his name running the U.S. Senate Finance Committee - long the most corrupt, lobbyist-ravaged panel in all of Washington (somehow, running the U.S. Congress's version of a pay-to-play casino now makes people credile "experts" in campaign strategy and political morality).
According to the nonpartisan Project for Excellence in Journalism, Edwards has long faced a media blackout - one that at least some honest media brokers like Keith Olbermann have noted. As I said a long time ago, that Edwards has even been able to compete in such a hostile environment is a testament to the power of his message.
The question we should ask is what the hostility and media blackout is really all about? I'd say the media's behavior is motivated by the same impulses that moves lobbyists to whine and cry to Reuters and self-important bloviators like O'Donnell to publicly burst a blood vessel on the Huffington Post - the people who have gotten used to the status quo are truly terrified by any candidates who they really believe will change things and threaten their power and status. Edwards is just such a candidate - one who threatens to muck up what the media and political elite want to be a race between two "nonthreatening," Wall Street-approved candidates. Obviously, it's a three-way race at this very moment - whether the Establishment likes that or not.
http://www.credoaction.com/sirota/2008/01/for_those_of_you_who_think_its.html
Hey, I can wish, can't I?
The Polls You Won’t Hear Much About: Who's the strongest Democratic candidate in a general election? Edwards.
.