Pro-Confederacy Supporter Promises Civil War Victory at Georgia Rally

[Guno צְבִי]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

 

[Matt Dillon]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

At least they have a hobby.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

It's only a matter of time before the heated rhetoric turns to heated violence. What these idiots don't understand is that when they start killing kids, it's game over for them.

They'll be crushed like cockroaches under the heel of American outrage.

Idiots and psychos tend to keep blindly pushing the envelope of American values and tolerance until they break on through and kill Americans. That's their final undoing. Some will die, most will go to prison like the numbnuts already serving their sentences or waiting for a trial that will send them away for life.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Fortunately, all the the White Supremacist Extremist supporters on JPP are all hat, no cattle. Impotent old men waiting to die with a tube in every hole.

 

[Taichiliberal]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

Only in America can you have people "celebrate" lengthy periods of human slavery in our nations history. Of course, to these yahoos slavery was a mere after thought to be settled in the future...and besides, everyone else did it at one time (Europeans, Africans, Asians), so two wrongs make a right, right?

Hell, I wonder if the Italians celebrate fascist day? We know that the Germans don't truck with Nazi BS...period. They know first hand the price for tolerating such a mindset and the double talk that goes with it.

But Confederate clowns aside, what about all those broken treaties and genocidal (physical, mental, spiritual) treatment of the First Peoples of what became America? Remember Wounded Knee? Leonard Peltier?

God indeed bless America, because sure can use all the help we can get!

 

[Code1211]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

So then...

Nothing actually happened, but you are saying that 200 people got together to observe something and that one of that pretty small group said something.

You seem to be reaching for outrage when and where none is justified.

 

[Taichiliberal]

So then...

Nothing actually happened, but you are saying that 200 people got together to observe something and that one of that pretty small group said something.

You seem to be reaching for outrage when and where none is justified.

Actually, he's pointing out that POS like this are still trying to gain significant numbers in one place..thus leading to what, voting blocks, law changing protests a'la the 1968 Civil Rights Movement?

These roaches are only insignificant until they are not....or were you not aware of the Jan. 6th incident? Best to call them out whenever & wherever possible.

 

[Code1211]

Actually, he's pointing out that POS like this are still trying to gain significant numbers in one place..thus leading to what, voting blocks, law changing protests a'la the 1968 Civil Rights Movement?

These roaches are only insignificant until they are not....or were you not aware of the Jan. 6th incident? Best to call them out whenever & wherever possible.

As far as I know, the First Amendment provides the same protections of speech to all along the entire political spectrum.

Are you asserting that all free speech be eliminated or only that speech that you detest coming from people that you detest?

First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

People of the age defined by Tom Brokaw as "The Greatest Generation" were fond of saying, "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

What's changed since the Greatest Generation raised their children?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Actually, he's pointing out that POS like this are still trying to gain significant numbers in one place..thus leading to what, voting blocks, law changing protests a'la the 1968 Civil Rights Movement?

These roaches are only insignificant until they are not....or were you not aware of the Jan. 6th incident? Best to call them out whenever & wherever possible.

As far as I know, the First Amendment provides the same protections of speech to all along the entire political spectrum.

Are you asserting that all free speech be eliminated or only that speech that you detest coming from people that you detest?

First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

People of the age defined by Tom Brokaw as "The Greatest Generation" were fond of saying, "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

What's changed since the Greatest Generation raised their children?

I don't know how many times I've said this over the years, but freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.

Neo-Nazi's, alt-right rummies, Oath Keeper creeps and the like are all for free speech ... so long as no one calls them out on their lies, revisionism, bigotry and hatred. Then all hell breaks loose.

Yeah, like it or not, speech and speakers who purposely invoke violence against one sector of the population have been shut down after their first few actions. The Jan. 6th attempted insurrection is a tantamount example of what I'm pointing to ... the Orange Oaf did his part with months of tweets, speeches and that final rally. If he were any regular citizen, any further actions in that vein would result in his arrest.

Oh, and while you're waving the flag, remember that the "greatest generation" won WWII, then took an additional 20 some odd years to end Jim Crow laws in our southern states. If the criminalization of certain actions and speeches by such entities as the KKK and Aryan Nation (who were under the law still allowed to exist) didn't happen, I'd still have to travel through some states only by daylight in stay in "negro" hotels. Hope you understand and recognize this.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

A pro-Confederacy supporter appeared to suggest there would be a Civil War "victory" during a controversial rally celebrating the Confederate Memorial Day this past weekend in Georgia.

Roughly 200 members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) gathered outside of a Confederate monument in Georgia's Stone Mountain park Saturday to honor their "heritage and history," one member told Reuters.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/p...id=EMMX&cvid=2b77b1aa2ed34997b2328d4ecfe9b642


Such subhuman white trash

It’s only a matter of time before the WSEs murder a bunch of Americans to make a political statement. It’s not like it’s the first time or that it’s unexpected.


https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/f...premacist Extremists_CVE Task Force_Final.pdf
Violent White Supremacist Extremists (WSE) are defined as individuals who seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, to support their belief in the intellectual and moral superiority of the white race over other races. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics may be constitutionally protected activities.a,1,2,3 This reference aid discusses trends with WSE targeting and tactics, historical attack data and examples of lethal attacks in the United States since 2012, their geographic location, mobilization to violence as lone offenders or members of small cells, social media use, and common behavioral indicators during their radicalization to violence

 

[Code1211]

I don't know how many times I've said this over the years, but freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.

Neo-Nazi's, alt-right rummies, Oath Keeper creeps and the like are all for free speech ... so long as no one calls them out on their lies, revisionism, bigotry and hatred. Then all hell breaks loose.

Yeah, like it or not, speech and speakers who purposely invoke violence against one sector of the population have been shut down after their first few actions. The Jan. 6th attempted insurrection is a tantamount example of what I'm pointing to ... the Orange Oaf did his part with months of tweets, speeches and that final rally. If he were any regular citizen, any further actions in that vein would result in his arrest.

Oh, and while you're waving the flag, remember that the "greatest generation" won WWII, then took an additional 20 some odd years to end Jim Crow laws in our southern states. If the criminalization of certain actions and speeches by such entities as the KKK and Aryan Nation (who were under the law still allowed to exist) didn't happen, I'd still have to travel through some states only by daylight in stay in "negro" hotels. Hope you understand and recognize this.

You seem to be both passionate and so biased that you don't even realize that the bias gripping you is warping your view of reality.

Is citing Constitutional protections of free speech something to which you object? Seems odd.

We are currently seeing the Leftists like Liz Warren calling for action and riling up the unthinking mob to create the mayhem of the Summer of 2020 all over again.

YOU are recommending that we ban at least one person in particular and, by the groups you name, many others from the Market Place of ideas. Again, seems odd.

Why are you so committed to the elimination of Constitutional Freedoms for individuals?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You seem to be both passionate and so biased that you don't even realize that the bias gripping you is warping your view of reality.

Is citing Constitutional protections of free speech something to which you object? Seems odd.

We are currently seeing the Leftists like Liz Warren calling for action and riling up the unthinking mob to create the mayhem of the Summer of 2020 all over again.

YOU are recommending that we ban at least one person in particular and, by the groups you name, many others from the Market Place of ideas. Again, seems odd.

Why are you so committed to the elimination of Constitutional Freedoms for individuals?

Do you attack the free speech of anyone on the right side of the room or only those on the left side?

 

[Code1211]

It's only a matter of time before the heated rhetoric turns to heated violence. What these idiots don't understand is that when they start killing kids, it's game over for them.

They'll be crushed like cockroaches under the heel of American outrage.

Idiots and psychos tend to keep blindly pushing the envelope of American values and tolerance until they break on through and kill Americans. That's their final undoing. Some will die, most will go to prison like the numbnuts already serving their sentences or waiting for a trial that will send them away for life.

Are you referring to the mostly peaceful protesters from the Summer of 2020?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Are you referring to the mostly peaceful protesters from the Summer of 2020?

All terrorists need to be neutralized regardless of their ideology. Do you agree or disagree?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I don't know how many times I've said this over the years, but freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.

Neo-Nazi's, alt-right rummies, Oath Keeper creeps and the like are all for free speech ... so long as no one calls them out on their lies, revisionism, bigotry and hatred. Then all hell breaks loose.

Yeah, like it or not, speech and speakers who purposely invoke violence against one sector of the population have been shut down after their first few actions. The Jan. 6th attempted insurrection is a tantamount example of what I'm pointing to ... the Orange Oaf did his part with months of tweets, speeches and that final rally. If he were any regular citizen, any further actions in that vein would result in his arrest.

Oh, and while you're waving the flag, remember that the "greatest generation" won WWII, then took an additional 20 some odd years to end Jim Crow laws in our southern states. If the criminalization of certain actions and speeches by such entities as the KKK and Aryan Nation (who were under the law still allowed to exist) didn't happen, I'd still have to travel through some states only by daylight in stay in "negro" hotels. Hope you understand and recognize this.

You seem to be both passionate and so biased that you don't even realize that the bias gripping you is warping your view of reality.

Is citing Constitutional protections of free speech something to which you object? Seems odd.

We are currently seeing the Leftists like Liz Warren calling for action and riling up the unthinking mob to create the mayhem of the Summer of 2020 all over again.

YOU are recommending that we ban at least one person in particular and, by the groups you name, many others from the Market Place of ideas. Again, seems odd.

Why are you so committed to the elimination of Constitutional Freedoms for individuals?

Your attempts to condescend to people you can't BS past is laughable.

1. Let's see you prove how stating freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.
is bias?

2. Where did I allude to or object to the Constitutional right to freedom of speech? Do you not understand what I wrote? Or are you going to blather on with insipid stubbornness rather than concede the point. Let's watch.

3. You mean the painfully edited and hyped video that some MAGA minion put on the web were some "pro-life" punks try to shout her down with dubious talking points or the collection of her out of context quotes? Jeez, here you are trying to come off as all intellectual like when you are just as easily manipulated like any rightwing yahoo on Jan. 6th. Here, for your education: https://www.glamour.com/story/elizabeth-warren-angry-video.

4. You just lied, my self aggrandizing friend. The chronology of the posts shows that I've stated (at least twice) that the banned offenders MUST HAVE A HISTORY OF REPEATEDLY INCITING RIOT OR VIOLENCE in their public addresses. Let me dumb it down for you: If you get on TV or radio and say Politician X enables rapists and should be run out of town, then Politician X can sue you for slander. You get convicted, but repeat the action...this time someone takes a shot at Politician X. At trial, you show no remorse or indication of change, so then you are banned from certain public forums and subject to imprisonment if you pull the same stunt again. Got that? I hope so, because your insipid stubbornness is getting boring.

5. The objective reader sees #1-4 and shakes their head at this last volley. Your last sentence is typical MAGA smoke blowing...you create and make false allegations when you can't disprove what someone says.. Pathetic, but not unexpected. You need to rewrite your code, son. It's old and error ridden. Carry on.

 

[Code1211]

Your attempts to condescend to people you can't BS past is laughable.

1. Let's see you prove how stating freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.
is bias?

2. Where did I allude to or object to the Constitutional right to freedom of speech? Do you not understand what I wrote? Or are you going to blather on with insipid stubbornness rather than concede the point. Let's watch.

3. You mean the painfully edited and hyped video that some MAGA minion put on the web were some "pro-life" punks try to shout her down with dubious talking points or the collection of her out of context quotes? Jeez, here you are trying to come off as all intellectual like when you are just as easily manipulated like any rightwing yahoo on Jan. 6th. Here, for your education: https://www.glamour.com/story/elizabeth-warren-angry-video.

4. You just lied, my self aggrandizing friend. The chronology of the posts shows that I've stated (at least twice) that the banned offenders MUST HAVE A HISTORY OF REPEATEDLY INCITING RIOT OR VIOLENCE in their public addresses. Let me dumb it down for you: If you get on TV or radio and say Politician X enables rapists and should be run out of town, then Politician X can sue you for slander. You get convicted, but repeat the action...this time someone takes a shot at Politician X. At trial, you show no remorse or indication of change, so then you are banned from certain public forums and subject to imprisonment if you pull the same stunt again. Got that? I hope so, because your insipid stubbornness is getting boring.

5. The objective reader sees #1-4 and shakes their head at this last volley. Your last sentence is typical MAGA smoke blowing...you create and make false allegations when you can't disprove what someone says.. Pathetic, but not unexpected. You need to rewrite your code, son. It's old and error ridden. Carry on.

Again, you seem to be not reading my posts and exhibiting a preference to argue points that you prefer instead of those that I post.

Too bad.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your attempts to condescend to people you can't BS past is laughable.

1. Let's see you prove how stating freedom of speech does not make one immune to the consequences of said speech. That is why we have laws against inciting to riot, slander, misrepresentation, etc.
is bias?

2. Where did I allude to or object to the Constitutional right to freedom of speech? Do you not understand what I wrote? Or are you going to blather on with insipid stubbornness rather than concede the point. Let's watch.

3. You mean the painfully edited and hyped video that some MAGA minion put on the web were some "pro-life" punks try to shout her down with dubious talking points or the collection of her out of context quotes? Jeez, here you are trying to come off as all intellectual like when you are just as easily manipulated like any rightwing yahoo on Jan. 6th. Here, for your education: https://www.glamour.com/story/elizab...en-angry-video.

4. You just lied, my self aggrandizing friend. The chronology of the posts shows that I've stated (at least twice) that the banned offenders MUST HAVE A HISTORY OF REPEATEDLY INCITING RIOT OR VIOLENCE in their public addresses. Let me dumb it down for you: If you get on TV or radio and say Politician X enables rapists and should be run out of town, then Politician X can sue you for slander. You get convicted, but repeat the action...this time someone takes a shot at Politician X. At trial, you show no remorse or indication of change, so then you are banned from certain public forums and subject to imprisonment if you pull the same stunt again. Got that? I hope so, because your insipid stubbornness is getting boring.

5. The objective reader sees #1-4 and shakes their head at this last volley. Your last sentence is typical MAGA smoke blowing...you create and make false allegations when you can't disprove what someone says.. Pathetic, but not unexpected. You need to rewrite your code, son. It's old and error ridden. Carry on

Again, you seem to be not reading my posts and exhibiting a preference to argue points that you prefer instead of those that I post.

Too bad.

This is juniors standard lame retort when he gets his ass handed to him on a silver platter. He doesn't even have the intellectual honesty and courage to concede a point...he just lies and denies and regurgitates the SOS.

My previous post stands. He's done.

 

[Code1211]

This is juniors standard lame retort when he gets his ass handed to him on a silver platter. He doesn't even have the intellectual honesty and courage to concede a point...he just lies and denies and regurgitates the SOS.

My previous post stands. He's done.

Your self admiration is what it is.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

People of the age defined by Tom Brokaw as "The Greatest Generation" were fond of saying, "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

What's changed since the Greatest Generation raised their children?

This, for one thing:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1273359990905024513

A person who can say THAT is the cult hero of many on the Right.