Professor says an adult wanting to have sex with a kid is accepted as being wrong but

I dont know that he said anything that is wrong, that we know is wrong, so far as I know this is an area that for a long time decent people did not think about much less learn and study on......but this drive by the WOKE to normalize pedophilia is certainly part of the "BURN AMERICA TO THE GROUND!" program.
 
"Pedophilia
Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.Wikipedia"

Maybe it's like Homosexuality, a "psychiatric disorder". Or, maybe it's like Homosexuality, a person is born that way. :dunno:
 
Jack said:
"Pedophilia
Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.Wikipedia"

Maybe it's like Homosexuality, a "psychiatric disorder". Or, maybe it's like Homosexuality, a person is born that way. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Correct. Homosexuals and others are born that way.

A sexual orientation is not an action.
 
AProudLefty said:
Correct. Homosexuals and others are born that way.

A sexual orientation is not an action.
Click to expand...

If you believe that, ... can you entertain the thought that 'Pedophiles' are 'born that way'?


Here's something from the link:

"Additional clips of Kershnar show him saying "the notion that it's wrong [to have sexual relations] even with a one-year-old, it's not quite obvious to me." He pointed out that in "at least one culture," there are reports of grandmothers allegedly "fellating their baby boys to calm them down when they're colicky." "



:whoa:
 
Also:
"Kershnar’s LinkedIn page shows he has been an employee of the State University of New York system for 23 years. His bio page for Fredonia outlines he is an attorney and has written on topics: "abortion, adult-child sex, hell, most valuable player, pornography, punishment, sexual fantasies, slavery, and torture."
 
Jack said:
If you believe that, ... can you entertain the thought that 'Pedophiles' are 'born that way'?


Here's something from the link:

"Additional clips of Kershnar show him saying "the notion that it's wrong [to have sexual relations] even with a one-year-old, it's not quite obvious to me." He pointed out that in "at least one culture," there are reports of grandmothers allegedly "fellating their baby boys to calm them down when they're colicky." "



:whoa:
Click to expand...

Again, a sexual orientation is not an action.

Is Kershnar free to express his opinion? Remember just lately when they defended Whoopie?

Is he going to be cancelled by the cancel culture?
 
AProudLefty said:
Again, a sexual orientation is not an action.

Is Kershnar free to express his opinion? Remember just lately when they defended Whoopie?

Is he going to be cancelled by the cancel culture?
Click to expand...

I support his 'Free Speech' and his ability to have an opinion. It's called 'Inquiry'.

I, personally, don't have a problem with Homosexuals engaging in Sodomy. That would be a consensual act.
As far as Pedophilia, the child (someone 12 and under) isn't really a 'sexual being' and I don't think would be able to make an informed decision.


Also, Males and Females are viewed differently. Males that engage in sex are called 'Studs'. Females that engage in sex are called 'Sluts'.
 
Jack said:
I support his 'Free Speech' and his ability to have an opinion. It's called 'Inquiry'.

I, personally, don't have a problem with Homosexuals engaging in Sodomy. That would be a consensual act.
As far as Pedophilia, the child (someone 12 and under) isn't really a 'sexual being' and I don't think would be able to make an informed decision.


Also, Males and Females are viewed differently. Males that engage in sex are called 'Studs'. Females that engage in sex are called 'Sluts'.
Click to expand...

That is where the confusion is.

A sexual orientation is just that, an orientation. It doesn't mean acting on it. One can be gay without ever having done any homosexual sexual relations. In fact plenty of them have been married and have had children.
 
AProudLefty said:
That is where the confusion is.

A sexual orientation is just that, an orientation. It doesn't mean acting on it. One can be gay without ever having done any homosexual sexual relations. In fact plenty of them have been married and have had children.
Click to expand...

:) I guess you feel 'acting on it' would be a 'sin'.
If a person is 'born that way', I can't see why not be yourself. I think 10% of Humanity in homosexual. If LGBTs people have consensual sex, ... who cares?

Course ... with the Religious Quacks, the Queers must be Killed.
 
Jack said:
:) I guess you feel 'acting on it' would be a 'sin'.
If a person is 'born that way', I can't see why not be yourself. I think 10% of Humanity in homosexual. If LGBTs people have consensual sex, ... who cares?

Course ... with the Religious Quacks, the Queers must be Killed.
Click to expand...

Course. No clue why they want those Queers jailed or killed.

They are not harming anyone.
 
Jack said:
:) I guess you feel 'acting on it' would be a 'sin'.
If a person is 'born that way', I can't see why not be yourself. I think 10% of Humanity in homosexual. If LGBTs people have consensual sex, ... who cares?

Course ... with the Religious Quacks, the Queers must be Killed.
Click to expand...

Take Alan Turing as an example. He wasn't a hero because he was a Queer.
 
AProudLefty said:
Exactly. We'll probably never know. It is hinted that Alexander the Great was gay.
Click to expand...


I had a girlfriend who had a Theory on 'homosexual'. She said it was based on from one to ten. At '5', you were 'bisexual'. At '10', you were 'Totally Straight'. At '1', you were a 'Ragging Faggot'.
She applied this to males and females equally.
Note. At one point, while stoned, we were talking about 'attractive people', and I said something about what she thought about 'so and so', and she said "I want to eat her Pussy".
Soooo ... I think she may have given her Theory some thought.
 
Jack said:
I had a girlfriend who had a Theory on 'homosexual'. She said it was based on from one to ten. At '5', you were 'bisexual'. At '10', you were 'Totally Straight'. At '1', you were a 'Ragging Faggot'.
She applied this to males and females equally.
Note. At one point, while stoned, we were talking about 'attractive people', and I said something about what she thought about 'so and so', and she said "I want to eat her Pussy".
Soooo ... I think she may have given her Theory some thought.
Click to expand...

:laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top