Race: today's lesson

Evmetro

New member
There are many meanings of the word "race", but in regard to political discussion, race is narrowed down to this context, as found on Merriam Webster:

any one of the groups that human beings can be divided into based on shared distinctive physical traits


There are five categories for data on race:

1) American Indian or Alaska Native.
2) Asian.
3) Black or African American.
4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
5) White.

You may notice that none of these five categories mention gender, religion, or nationality, so I will include a list here of what race is not:

Women
Gays
Muslims
Mexicans
All humankind
Unemployed
Disabled
Lefty
 
There are many meanings of the word "race", but in regard to political discussion, race is narrowed down to this context, as found on Merriam Webster:




There are five categories for data on race:

1) American Indian or Alaska Native.
2) Asian.
3) Black or African American.
4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
5) White.

You may notice that none of these five categories mention gender, religion, or nationality, so I will include a list here of what race is not:

Women
Gays
Muslims
Mexicans
All humankind
Unemployed
Disabled
Lefty
Don't tell a Hawaiin Native they're the same race as a Samoan.
 
Blumenbach's work included his description of sixty human crania (skulls) published originally in fascicules as Decas craniorum (Göttingen, 1790–1828). This was a founding work for other scientists in the field of craniometry. He divided the human species into five races in 1779, later founded on crania research (description of human skulls), and called them (1793/1795):

the Caucasian or white race.
the Mongolian or yellow race, including all East Asians and some Central Asians.
the Malayan or brown race, including Southeast Asian and Pacific Islanders.
the Ethiopian or black race, including sub-Saharan Africans.
the American or red race, including American Indians.
Further anatomical study led him to the conclusion that 'individual Africans differ as much, or even more, from other Africans as from Europeans'.


continued

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Friedrich_Blumenbach
 
Here is another thread on this forum that demonstrates the shocking ignorance of lefties when it comes to what race is:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?80126-Trump-is-not-a-racist

No lefty has ever been able to post the evidence that is requested about racism, but there were lots of examples of Muslims and mexicans being presented as if they were a race...


Aryan People

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Aryan

Aryan, name originally given to a people who were said to speak an archaic Indo-European language and who were thought to have settled in prehistoric times in ancient Iran and the northern Indian subcontinent. The theory of an “Aryan race” appeared in the mid-19th century and ...
 
Continued


The theory of an “Aryan race” appeared in the mid-19th century and remained prevalent until the mid-20th century. According to the hypothesis, those probably light-skinned Aryans were the group who invaded and conquered ancient India from the north and whose literature, religion, and modes of social organization subsequently shaped the course of Indian culture, particularly the Vedic religion that informed and was eventually superseded by Hinduism.

However, since the late 20th century, a growing number of scholars have rejected both the Aryan invasion hypothesis and the use of the term Aryan as a racial designation, suggesting that the Sanskrit term arya (“noble” or “distinguished”), the linguistic root of the word, was actually a social rather than an ethnic epithet.

Rather, the term is used strictly in a linguistic sense, in recognition of the influence that the language of the ancient northern migrants had on the development of the Indo-European languages of South Asia. In the 19th century “Aryan” was used as a synonym for “Indo-European” and also, more restrictively, to refer to the Indo-Iranian languages.

It is now used in linguistics only in the sense of the term Indo-Aryan languages, a branch of the larger Indo-European language family.

In Europe the notion of white racial superiority emerged in the 1850s, propagated most assiduously by the comte de Gobineau and later by his disciple Houston Stewart Chamberlain, who first used the term “Aryan” to mean the “white race.” Members of that so-called race spoke Indo-European languages, were credited with all the progress that benefited humanity, and were purported to be superior to “Semites,” “yellows,” and “blacks.”

Believers in Aryanism came to regard the Nordic and Germanic peoples as the purest members of the “race.” That notion, which had been repudiated by anthropologists by the second quarter of the 20th century, was seized upon by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and was made the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and other “non-Aryans.”

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, many white supremacist groups used the word Aryan in their name as an identifier of their racist ideology. Those groups include the Aryan Circle (a large group that had its roots in the Texas prison system), the Aryan Nations (a Christian Identity-based hate group prominent in the late 20th century), and the Aryan Brotherhood (a group originating in San Quentin [California] prison). That association with racism, crime, hate crimes, and Nazism has given the word a powerful new negative sense.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Aryan
 
There are many meanings of the word "race", but in regard to political discussion, race is narrowed down to this context, as found on Merriam Webster:

any one of the groups that human beings can be divided into based on shared distinctive physical traits


There are five categories for data on race:

1) American Indian or Alaska Native.
2) Asian.
3) Black or African American.
4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
5) White.

You may notice that none of these five categories mention gender, religion, or nationality, so I will include a list here of what race is not:

Aryan
Women
Gays
Muslims
Mexicans
All humankind
Unemployed
Disabled
Lefty
 
Continued


The theory of an “Aryan race” appeared in the mid-19th century and remained prevalent until the mid-20th century. According to the hypothesis, those probably light-skinned Aryans were the group who invaded and conquered ancient India from the north and whose literature, religion, and modes of social organization subsequently shaped the course of Indian culture, particularly the Vedic religion that informed and was eventually superseded by Hinduism.

However, since the late 20th century, a growing number of scholars have rejected both the Aryan invasion hypothesis and the use of the term Aryan as a racial designation, suggesting that the Sanskrit term arya (“noble” or “distinguished”), the linguistic root of the word, was actually a social rather than an ethnic epithet.

Rather, the term is used strictly in a linguistic sense, in recognition of the influence that the language of the ancient northern migrants had on the development of the Indo-European languages of South Asia. In the 19th century “Aryan” was used as a synonym for “Indo-European” and also, more restrictively, to refer to the Indo-Iranian languages.

It is now used in linguistics only in the sense of the term Indo-Aryan languages, a branch of the larger Indo-European language family.

In Europe the notion of white racial superiority emerged in the 1850s, propagated most assiduously by the comte de Gobineau and later by his disciple Houston Stewart Chamberlain, who first used the term “Aryan” to mean the “white race.” Members of that so-called race spoke Indo-European languages, were credited with all the progress that benefited humanity, and were purported to be superior to “Semites,” “yellows,” and “blacks.”

Believers in Aryanism came to regard the Nordic and Germanic peoples as the purest members of the “race.” That notion, which had been repudiated by anthropologists by the second quarter of the 20th century, was seized upon by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and was made the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Roma (Gypsies), and other “non-Aryans.”

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, many white supremacist groups used the word Aryan in their name as an identifier of their racist ideology. Those groups include the Aryan Circle (a large group that had its roots in the Texas prison system), the Aryan Nations (a Christian Identity-based hate group prominent in the late 20th century), and the Aryan Brotherhood (a group originating in San Quentin [California] prison). That association with racism, crime, hate crimes, and Nazism has given the word a powerful new negative sense.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Aryan

Aryan is a social term, not a race. I updated the list of what is not a race in post 12.
 
There are many meanings of the word "race", but in regard to political discussion, race is narrowed down to this context, as found on Merriam Webster:




There are five categories for data on race:

1) American Indian or Alaska Native.
2) Asian.
3) Black or African American.
4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
5) White.

You may notice that none of these five categories mention gender, religion, or nationality, so I will include a list here of what race is not:

Aryan
Women
Gays
Muslims
Mexicans
All humankind
Unemployed
Disabled
Lefty


What is you point exactly?

There are more differences in class than in race IMO.
 
It's funny that Evmetro talks about race, as if other bigotry is excused because it's not race related. We are all people, so hating on someone, or thinking your superior based on age, gender, religion, race, disability, wealth, sexual orientation, etc, is bigotry. It's sickening, and yes wannabe Christians, it's a big time sin. Now off with your sinful selves. Pray extra hard, that God gives you a mulligan, because of bad culture, and stupidity.
 
It's funny that Evmetro talks about race, as if other bigotry is excused because it's not race related. We are all people, so hating on someone, or thinking your superior based on age, gender, religion, race, disability, wealth, sexual orientation, etc, is bigotry. It's sickening, and yes wannabe Christians, it's a big time sin. Now off with your sinful selves. Pray extra hard, that God gives you a mulligan, because of bad culture, and stupidity.

Christianity in america was/still is leveraged to justify all manner of supremacy in the furtherance of america's genocide, enslavement, global natural resource extraction/control and land grabbing.
 
It's funny that Evmetro talks about race, as if other bigotry is excused because it's not race related. We are all people, so hating on someone, or thinking your superior based on age, gender, religion, race, disability, wealth, sexual orientation, etc, is bigotry. It's sickening, and yes wannabe Christians, it's a big time sin. Now off with your sinful selves. Pray extra hard, that God gives you a mulligan, because of bad culture, and stupidity.

I will go ahead and update the list of what is NOT racism. Mentioning other forms of bigotry in order to talk about racism is not required.
 
Back
Top