Reelection hopes are fading

floridafan

Verified User
According to a report from Politico, a very nervous Donald Trump is reaching out to associates who were a part of his surprising 2016 presidential run for help as his 2020 re-election bid falters and his opponent, Joe Biden surges ahead in the polls.

“President Donald Trump, increasingly nervous about the direction of his campaign as he struggles in general election polls, is considering bringing back more loyal aides from his successful campaign in 2016, according to five Republicans who speak to the president,” reports Politico’s Anita Kumar.

With one associate of the president stating, “Recent internal polling painted uneasy seas ahead and President Trump wanted some of his warriors back,” Kumar added, “Trump is increasingly concerned that his reelection prospects could be slipping away and wants to bring in staffers he trusts from his original scrappy campaign.”

Defend democracy. Click to invest in courageous progressive journalism today.
The desire to beef up his 2020 team has put campaign manager Brad Pascale under the microscope, with memories of Trump making major and constant changes to his 2016 team.

“Trump remains frustrated about the leadership of campaign manager Brad Parscale, himself a 2016 loyalist who served as digital strategist and is now running his first presidential campaign, the five Republicans say. Specifically, the president has continued to complain that Parscale is burning through too much money too quickly,” Kumar wrote.

According to another Trump insider, “Brad worked when they needed someone to jump in but they don’t need him anymore,” adding Trump’s moribund campaign is now in need of a professional with more experience.

Writing, “With less than five months left before the election, polls show Trump lagging behind presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden in most national polls. And his standing has fallen in many key states, such as Ohio and Iowa, and even in traditionally red states, such as Arizona and Georgia, in both public and campaign polls,” Kumar added, “It’s unlikely that hiring a handful of 2016 staffers will fundamentally change the campaign unless they take on top-level jobs at headquarters, but they could help the president’s prospects in pivotal states.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/ne...20-campaign-as-re-election-hopes-fade-report/
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/09/trump-2016-team-campaign-307896
 
I wouldn't hold my breath on this... A lot can happen in the roughly five months until the election. Polls at the moment really are kind of meaningless... as Hillary and Dewey both found out...
 
Polls are meaningful at the moment, yes. that's a given.

This poll shows that Trump is vulnerable at the moment and Biden should figure out how to cease on that.
 
Polling does not reflect the anomaly that can happen with the Electoral College. That said, Biden is ahead of where HRC was at this stage in 2016.
 
I wouldn't hold my breath on this... A lot can happen in the roughly five months until the election. Polls at the moment really are kind of meaningless... as Hillary and Dewey both found out...

This is getting to be time where polls are important. It is only 5 months. Hillary polls ended up spot on.
 
She won the popular vote, by 3,000,000, the poll was correct.

The popular vote doesn't matter, the electoral college vote does.

Oh, that's also the way it should be, because a straight popular vote represents mob rule. If it was made mandatory that states apportion their electoral college votes by the popular vote in their state rather than "winner takes all" the Democrats would never win another Presidential election. Something to think about.
On the other hand, if we were to idiotically go to a straight popular vote for President just 7 states would be relevant and the rest would get kicked to the curb. That's because the 7 most populous states in the US hold well over 50% of the population. That would be bad for the rest of the country.
 
The popular vote doesn't matter, the electoral college vote does.

Oh, that's also the way it should be, because a straight popular vote represents mob rule. If it was made mandatory that states apportion their electoral college votes by the popular vote in their state rather than "winner takes all" the Democrats would never win another Presidential election. Something to think about.
On the other hand, if we were to idiotically go to a straight popular vote for President just 7 states would be relevant and the rest would get kicked to the curb. That's because the 7 most populous states in the US hold well over 50% of the population. That would be bad for the rest of the country.

Populated states should not be punished and held to the whim of small unpopulated states. Why should a voter in Montana’s vote be three times the value of my vote in Texas?

The Founding Fathers were elitist who thought the common man shouldn’t vote for President, that it should be done by chosen representatives who were better educated. Talk about a deep state.
 
Populated states should not be punished and held to the whim of small unpopulated states. Why should a voter in Montana’s vote be three times the value of my vote in Texas?

The Founding Fathers were elitist who thought the common man shouldn’t vote for President, that it should be done by chosen representatives who were better educated. Talk about a deep state.

So small unpopulated states should be punished and held to the whims of populated states? Why should a voter in Montana's vote not count?

The Founders set up a Republic and divided power every way they could. They made the House representatives of the People elected frequently and by popular vote. They made the Senate representatives of the States and Senators were appointed by each State to a six year term for greater stability. But, that got wiped out by the 17th Amendment effectively ending each State having a voice in Congress and got replaced with making the Senate nothing but another House body popularly elected by the People. Bad idea.
They divided power among the legislature, Presidency, and courts but that's eroding too.

Calls for a popularly elected President will just exacerbate the concentration of power into the hands of a few.

As Black Sabbath once said in a song, "When you listen to fools, the mob rules."
 
I was saying by mid 2016 that Trump is a one termer, now that it is clear that the Elite Class is willing to run a fraudulent election if required to be rid of Trump and the Rebellion I was certainly correct, though at the time I underestimated how corrupt the Elite Class is.
 
So small unpopulated states should be punished and held to the whims of populated states? Why should a voter in Montana's vote not count?

The Founders set up a Republic and divided power every way they could. They made the House representatives of the People elected frequently and by popular vote. They made the Senate representatives of the States and Senators were appointed by each State to a six year term for greater stability. But, that got wiped out by the 17th Amendment effectively ending each State having a voice in Congress and got replaced with making the Senate nothing but another House body popularly elected by the People. Bad idea.
They divided power among the legislature, Presidency, and courts but that's eroding too.

Calls for a popularly elected President will just exacerbate the concentration of power into the hands of a few.

As Black Sabbath once said in a song, "When you listen to fools, the mob rules."
One person, one vote. We are no longer slavers who need an advantage. The will of the People should be upheld. The electoral system is past its expiration date.
 
Sure, there are several factions like, "What are the Bernie Bots gonna do- if anything"!

And someone mentioned a 10 million waste of Democrat votes that won't count due to the largest voter block of all, the Electoral system- and that is certainly possible.

And who knows if the VP choice is going to change votes or leave people at home in November!

Who knows who Putin wants anymore?

Who knows how many would be voters are now dead due to the virus?

Who knows if the virus will have such a comeback, how many will even risk going to the polls?

Who knows how the military in uniform or retired military will even vote this time?

Lots of dynamics here!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top