Replacing Statues

[BentBow]

Taking down Robert E. Lee and replacing them with Donald J. Trump Statues.


TRIGGERED!

 

[archives]

Statues to individuals are 19th Century, besides Trump already has his own statues, his ego is too big not to, just drive down the Henry Hudson in NYC and you can see all the buildings he paid just to have his name put on them

 

[Darth Omar]

Statues to individuals are 19th Century, besides Trump already has his own statues, his ego is too big not to, just drive down the Henry Hudson in NYC and you can see all the buildings he paid just to have his name put on them

By all means, let's erase part of our culture because it's 19 century.

 

[archives]

By all means, let's erase part of our culture because it's 19 century.

First off, the topic post was about erecting a statue to Trump, and those individuals whose statues are falling aren't part of "our culture," only that of a few, most of those statues went up long after the Civil War

 

[USFREEDOM911]

First off, the topic post was about erecting a statue to Trump, and those individuals whose statues are falling aren't part of "our culture," only that of a few, most of those statues went up long after the Civil War

Aren't most statues erected; due to a few?

 

[Darth Omar]

First off, the topic post was about erecting a statue to Trump, and those individuals whose statues are falling aren't part of "our culture," only that of a few, most of those statues went up long after the Civil War

Only that of a few? You need to look at the national poll numbers.

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1B12EG

It seems 'the few' are driving this issue. Politically, this isn't the hill you want to die on if you want to start winning again.

 

[Русский агент]

Statues to individuals are 19th Century

izzat so?

 

[archives]

Only that of a few? You need to look at the national poll numbers.

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1B12EG

It seems 'the few' are driving this issue. Politically, this isn't the hill you want to die on if you want to start winning again.

And it is only an "issue" with a few, poll was about the removal of the statues, not if the statues are a part of American culture, they aren't proven by the fact the overwhelming percentage of them are only found in a certain part of the country

 

[Русский агент]

By all means, let's erase part of our culture because it's 19 century.

its not true tho

multitudes of commemorative statuary on publicly owned have been erected since 1901

u cant believe what a lib sez

ever

 

[archives]

izzat so?

And half of them are corny, gone in fifty years because no one remembers the individuals, or did you think John Wayne was going to be remembered in time

 

[Русский агент]

And it is only an "issue" with a few, poll was about the removal of the statues, not if the statues are a part of American culture, they aren't proven by the fact the overwhelming percentage of them are only found in a certain part of the country

so now u say the overwhelming percentage of them (statues) are only found in a certain part of the country?

prove it

 

[Русский агент]

And half of them are corny, gone in fifty years because no one remembers the individuals, or did you think John Wayne was going to be remembered in time

i caught u lying

u seem a lil bit salty

 

[archives]

its not true tho

multitudes of commemorative statuary on publicly owned have been erected since 1901

u cant believe what a lib sez

ever

Beautiful, 1901, oh, that makes it relevant in 2017

 

[archives]

i caught u lying

u seem a lil bit salty

.

Hardly, unless one thinks Wayne and Sly are historically noteworthy

 

[Русский агент]

Beautiful, 1901, oh, that makes it relevant in 2017

do u know what period of time "after 1901" covers liberal liar?

moving those goalpostz again

and i spose u think u get 2 define relevant

 

[anatta]

Beautiful, 1901, oh, that makes it relevant in 2017

it makes them historical or historically relevant

 

[Русский агент]

.

Hardly, unless one thinks Wayne and Sly are historically noteworthy

move those goalpostz liberal liar!



u said this:

Statues to individuals are 19th Century

i proved u lied so u started qualifying what u think iz noteworthy



u r 2 ez to spank

 

[Русский агент]

it makes them historical or historically relevant

didja notice he dared not say mlk statues were corny irrelevant or not noteworthy?

that would be rayciss

 

[archives]

do u know what period of time "after 1901" covers liberal liar?

moving those goalpostz again

and i spose u think u get 2 define relevant

Sure, according to you eternity, for the rest of us it's over a century ago

And by the way, emojis are corny, well, unless your a junior high girl

 

[archives]

didja notice he dared not say mlk statues were corny irrelevant or not noteworthy?

that would be rayciss

Authored half, duh, and it is pretty funny you had to come up with Wayne and Sly to attempt to prove your " point"