Reporters are left stunned by Trump’s “people in dark shadows” comments

John Barron

Verified User
Last night, President Trump pushed conspiracy theories so mind-bogglingly crazy that the fact-checkers have been left stunned by his audacity.
During an interview with white supremacist FOX host Laura Ingraham last night, Trump dove into the realm of preposterous conspiracy theory and claimed that “we had somebody get on a plane from a certain city this weekend, and in the plane it was almost completely loaded with thugs, wearing these dark uniforms, black uniforms, with gear and this and that.”
When Ingraham asked him for any kind of details about the obviously fictitious flight, he merely replied with “I’ll tell you sometime.”

https://occupydemocrats.com/2020/09...N08uogxa-8Rp7SYMyl5Ox0Frd8LMgIUJTEm7vygqFMuI8
 
OccupyDemocrats. LMAO! How fucking gullible are you?
You haven't seen the interview? It's on every news outlet.

Same one where she had to make sure he didn't make a golf analogy when referring to cops murdering black people.
 
He is veering into Protocols of the Elders of Zion now. Which is the natural progression for Conservatism.
 
It appears that Trump's mental state is deteriorating rather quickly.
 
Last night, President Trump pushed conspiracy theories so mind-bogglingly crazy that the fact-checkers have been left stunned by his audacity.
During an interview with white supremacist FOX host Laura Ingraham last night, Trump dove into the realm of preposterous conspiracy theory and claimed that “we had somebody get on a plane from a certain city this weekend, and in the plane it was almost completely loaded with thugs, wearing these dark uniforms, black uniforms, with gear and this and that.”
When Ingraham asked him for any kind of details about the obviously fictitious flight, he merely replied with “I’ll tell you sometime.”

https://occupydemocrats.com/2020/09...N08uogxa-8Rp7SYMyl5Ox0Frd8LMgIUJTEm7vygqFMuI8

Why did you have to use that source? You're going to get a source reaction only and it's already starting. I did the same reading the blurb and seeing the source. Surely you had better than that hyper-partisan junk pile to present this. This liberal won't touch it any more than American Thinker.
 
Why did you have to use that source? You're going to get a source reaction only and it's already starting. I did the same reading the blurb and seeing the source. Surely you had better than that hyper-partisan junk pile to present this. This liberal won't touch it any more than American Thinker.

American Thinker makes me laugh. Republicans are held in such low esteem they created a market for a product
for Republicans who know their reputation for being stupid and unenlightened

If really bad beer became a beverage's product reputation, the less than clever marketers for American Thinker would rebrand the product line "really good beer"
to market to people with really poor taste. LOL

Read our rag and don't be ashamed, if you read American Thinker, you can't be stupid!
 
Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
OccupyDemocrats. LMAO! How fucking gullible are you?


Says the bozo who fell for Trump hook line and sinker and is going to do it again.
Anyone can trip into a hole, I suppose, but it takes a super moron to dive into it head first intentionally the second time.
Trump. :laugh:
 
OccupyDemocrats. LMAO! How fucking gullible are you?

Evidently he thinks that all the antifa/blm mobs traveling from city to city with all their equipment and supplies
in place ahead of time are merely little local grassroots types with no funding behind them.
 
Evidently he thinks that all the antifa/blm mobs traveling from city to city with all their equipment and supplies
in place ahead of time are merely little local grassroots types with no funding behind them.

Then why didn't say "that all the antifa/blm mobs traveling from city to city with all their equipment and supplies" instead of "people in dark shadows?"

Like "deep state," if you don't ever specify you don't have to provide proof or details, it's just Trump's version of "those people," it can be used or applied to a multiple of situations
 
Back
Top