Representative Thomas Massie: Pesticides and P**ophiles "Why do both get immunity?" in Pointed Challenge

[Number Six]

• Massie draws parallel between corporate protections and Epstein scandal.
• Trump's order shields glyphosate makers from lawsuits.
• Bill introduced to repeal pesticide immunity.

WASHINGTON D.C., Feb 21 (TNGB) - Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie sparked a firestorm with a social media post. He compared legal shields for pesticide firms to protections in the Jeffrey Epstein case. This comes right after President Trump's executive order boosted glyphosate production under national security claims.

People see this as a jab at government favors for big companies and elite figures. Massie's known for bucking his party on health and accountability issues. His question highlights frustrations over unchecked power in both areas.

Massie's comparison holds water since the executive order does grant liability protections to glyphosate producers. Non-prosecution deals in Epstein's 2008 plea also shielded some associates. This rhetorical link points out real inconsistencies in how immunity gets handed out.

The response was intense: https://thenextgenbusiness.com/fact...why-do-both-get-immunity-in-pointed-challenge