i think that the reps will come out against the afghan war
they are already calling it bho's war...
they are already calling it bho's war...
APP - republicans Vs afghanistan
- Thread starter Don Quixote
- Start date
opportunistic politician logic
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
?
where do you get this from? so what you're saying is....obama's command of the war in afghanistan and his change in strategy from bush doesn't make it his?
where do you get this from? so what you're saying is....obama's command of the war in afghanistan and his change in strategy from bush doesn't make it his?
cawacko
Well-known member
lol... wait, you guys are calling Republicans flip-floppers and citizen is projecting all over the place because DQ thinks the Republicans might turn against it? And particular reason you think they might turn against it DQ? Any evidence to back up what you believe?
Barack Obama sure as hell didn't start the war in Afghanistan and I don't think he was even in Congress at the time it started. But as CIC what we do going forward is his call. So yeah as CIC you stand to be the one congratulated or criticized based on your decisions. It's as if the mere thought that something might occur where Obama might get critized turns you and citizen into little whiny teenagers (no offense DQ).
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
both cawacko and i have asked where you guys get this from? and this is your answer....
F
cawacko
Well-known member
LMAO!!! That was his response? So DQ says 'I think the Republicans are going to turn against Afghanistan'. (I apologize Yurt for not including you here if you said the same thing) So I ask DQ why he believes that or if he has any evidence and that is deflecting?
Based on what DQ says citizen then starts talking about Republicans flip-flopping and were for it before they were against it and how he can't understand them all based upon DQ saying he thinks the Republicans won't support the war in Afghanistan. That is classic projection right there. And that is exactly what I responded to. Where is there any deflection in that? There isn't. You just got called out citizen and don't like it so you throw out a baseless accusation. Step up your game sir.
bush started the war with regard to his declaration of war on terrorism
bho has found it necessary to continue the war and give it the priority that it deserved
perhaps it would be best to say that it is both of their war
i saw a rep us senator on cnn saying that he would not support putting more troops into afganistan...other than mccain
i think that the reps will use the afghan war against bho even if bushco started it
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
yes, i agree with that....i haven't heard anyone say it isn't bush's war to begin with....
C
Cancel5
Guest
The "Muslims bomb", the only Muslims bomb.
sadly, i agree
seems strange what with the war on drugs and all that we have to support a nation that is the main producer of heroin/opium
cawacko
Well-known member
You can make legitimate arguments about how many troops in Afghanistan are optimal. Now if a guy is just saying it to be a hack that's one thing. You think Republicans are just going to say we should pull out of Afghanistan? Hell, not that this board is a scientific sample or anything but I haven't seen one person on the right state we should leave Afghanistan while there have been several on the left that believe we should leave now.
You are obviously entitled to your opinion I just think it happens to be way off.
if bush had kept his promise to subsidize agriculture, there would not be so many poppy fields
i do not put anything past the reps at this point, but as you say it is my thought on the subject, time will tell
ps the general in charge is thought to be going to ask for 25,000 more troops...or more and the europeans have only promised their troops until after the current election
