As the Shareholding Class, which is best for US?
1. We make our money off the backs of the Worker Drones.
2. If the Worker Drones stop production and stop consumption, we lose money.
3. It might be better to send the Worker Drones back into the fields to maintain production and consumption.
4. Sure, we lose some of the Worker Drones, but they can be replaced with Imported Worker Drones.
5. Besides, Automation and Robotics will be replacing these people anyway.
6. This could be a Win/Win.
7. We speed up the 'automation' cycle, and we kill off the excess Worker Drones at the same time.
We, the Shareholding Class, are already in our Bunkers and are well insulated from 'the little people', ... so, is it in our best interests to get the Worker Drones*back into circulation and do what they are meant to do: Maintain Production and Consumption.
Our Monthly Statements have been hammered. Dividends dwindling. Appreciation evaporated.
What think you?
1. We make our money off the backs of the Worker Drones.
2. If the Worker Drones stop production and stop consumption, we lose money.
3. It might be better to send the Worker Drones back into the fields to maintain production and consumption.
4. Sure, we lose some of the Worker Drones, but they can be replaced with Imported Worker Drones.
5. Besides, Automation and Robotics will be replacing these people anyway.
6. This could be a Win/Win.
7. We speed up the 'automation' cycle, and we kill off the excess Worker Drones at the same time.
We, the Shareholding Class, are already in our Bunkers and are well insulated from 'the little people', ... so, is it in our best interests to get the Worker Drones*back into circulation and do what they are meant to do: Maintain Production and Consumption.
Our Monthly Statements have been hammered. Dividends dwindling. Appreciation evaporated.
What think you?