Revenge of the white men???

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
How will insane rage affect the coming election?

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-kuhn22-2010mar22,0,976302,print.story

That's bullshit, but it could still kill us in November.

Obama didn't "decide" to increase the size of government - he took action to save us from Bush's bungling. How stupid are white men that they can't see that?

White men wanted Detroit to fail?

White men enjoy paying $1000 a month for health care that's denied them when they need it?

It would be nice if Democrats would say, "Bush's tax cuts for the super-rich killed the economy by strangling the Middle class," but they refuse to do that because listing the facts isn't on their radar.

People won't vote for Democrats until they give them a reason to.
Bart
 
signalmankenneth said:
How will insane rage affect the coming election?

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-kuhn22-2010mar22,0,976302,print.story

That's bullshit, but it could still kill us in November.

Obama didn't "decide" to increase the size of government - he took action to save us from Bush's bungling. How stupid are white men that they can't see that?

White men wanted Detroit to fail?

White men enjoy paying $1000 a month for health care that's denied them when they need it?

It would be nice if Democrats would say, "Bush's tax cuts for the super-rich killed the economy by strangling the Middle class," but they refuse to do that because listing the facts isn't on their radar.

People won't vote for Democrats until they give them a reason to.
Bart
Click to expand...

White men are the only ones smart enough to see obama's creeping fascist totaltiarian takeover. Typical.
 
AssHatZombie said:
White men are the only ones smart enough to see obama's creeping fascist totaltiarian takeover. Typical.
Click to expand...

not true...just one example from this board: blackascoal

i mention him solely due to his exploitation of his skin color. i have no doubt there are others azzwhipple and to pretend otherwise is stupid
 
signalmankenneth said:
How will insane rage affect the coming election?

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-kuhn22-2010mar22,0,976302,print.story

That's bullshit, but it could still kill us in November.

Obama didn't "decide" to increase the size of government - he took action to save us from Bush's bungling. How stupid are white men that they can't see that?

White men wanted Detroit to fail?

White men enjoy paying $1000 a month for health care that's denied them when they need it?

It would be nice if Democrats would say, "Bush's tax cuts for the super-rich killed the economy by strangling the Middle class," but they refuse to do that because listing the facts isn't on their radar.

People won't vote for Democrats until they give them a reason to.
Bart
Click to expand...

Hey Ken or Bart if that is your real name, how did the Bush tax cuts strangle the middle class when the middle class received tax cuts themselves? Is your argument money that the rich were able to keep would have been spent by the government on the middle class? Is that your attempted spin here or "facts" as you claim?
 
cawacko said:
Hey Ken or Bart if that is your real name, how did the Bush tax cuts strangle the middle class when the middle class received tax cuts themselves? Is your argument money that the rich were able to keep would have been spent by the government on the middle class? Is that your attempted spin here or "facts" as you claim?
Click to expand...

President Bush's tax cuts since 2001 have shifted more of the tax burden from the nation's rich to middle-class families, according to a study released Friday by the Congressional Budget Office.

People in the top 20 percent of incomes, averaging $182,700 a year, saw their share of federal taxes decline from 65.3 percent of total payments in 2001 to 63.5 percent this year, according to the study by congressional budget analysts.

In contrast, middle-class taxpayers — with incomes ranging from $51,500 to $75,600 — bear a greater tax burden. Those making an average of $75,600 had the biggest jump in their share of taxes, from 18.5 percent of all payments in 2001 to 19.5 percent this year.

"George W. Bush keeps trying to mislead Americans into thinking we're turning the corner, but truth is that he is turning his back on middle-class families," Kerry spokesman Phil Singer said. "The Bush policies are exacerbating the squeeze that working families have been feeling for the last four years."

The study is based on figures in 2001 and assumes no changes in wealth distribution from increases in income, dividends or capital gains.
By Joel Roberts

This crap is still going on, the bush tax cuts for the rich expire at the end of this year!
 
signalmankenneth said:
President Bush's tax cuts since 2001 have shifted more of the tax burden from the nation's rich to middle-class families, according to a study released Friday by the Congressional Budget Office.

People in the top 20 percent of incomes, averaging $182,700 a year, saw their share of federal taxes decline from 65.3 percent of total payments in 2001 to 63.5 percent this year, according to the study by congressional budget analysts.

In contrast, middle-class taxpayers — with incomes ranging from $51,500 to $75,600 — bear a greater tax burden. Those making an average of $75,600 had the biggest jump in their share of taxes, from 18.5 percent of all payments in 2001 to 19.5 percent this year.

"George W. Bush keeps trying to mislead Americans into thinking we're turning the corner, but truth is that he is turning his back on middle-class families," Kerry spokesman Phil Singer said. "The Bush policies are exacerbating the squeeze that working families have been feeling for the last four years."

The study is based on figures in 2001 and assumes no changes in wealth distribution from increases in income, dividends or capital gains.
By Joel Roberts

This crap is still going on, the bush tax cuts for the rich expire at the end of this year!
Click to expand...

Well quoting a John Kerry spokesman I'm assuming during an election year doesn't really lend much credibility. What do you think a spokesman is going to say?

And it says this study is based on 2001 figures but then above says from 2001 to today. When is today?
 
Ok I went back and reread. Yes if Obama let's the Bush tax cuts expire most white men will not vote for him again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top