Rob Porter isn't the first abuser John Kelly has has defended

Bourbon

In Yo Face!
In 2016, Kelly defended a Marine convicted of sexual misconduct — who was arrested again in 2017 for “indecent liberties” with children.

.... and we all know that's a Huge No NO around here ... :D ... well defenders, WhaDaYa have to say about this?

New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Peter Baker dug up another example of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly praising a man accused of serious allegations of misconduct involving multiple women.

This week, Kelly defended staff secretary Rob Porter — even speaking to his character, calling him a “man of true integrity and honor” — after credible allegations of domestic violence made by Porter’s former wives became public. Kelly now finds himself under fire for keeping Porter on for so long, and for giving him increasing responsibility despite an ongoing FBI investigation into his behavior.

Back in 2016, Kelly did something similar. He appeared as a character witness for a former Marine colonel charged with sexually harassing a female subordinate. The colonel even went so far as to ask the woman to destroy evidence of their communications and was also charged with driving drunk to his own arraignment hearing.

That Marine colonel, Todd Shane Tomko, was the former commander of the Marines’ Wounded Warrior Regiment, but according to his defense attorney and to Chief of Staff Kelly and other character witnesses at his court-martial, he had spiraled rapidly as a result of post-traumatic stress disorder.



Read more: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...porter-john-kelly-white-house-abuser-defended
 
Porter failed the investigation and was not permitted clearance. It seems Kelly and Trump allowed him access. Laws are for little people.
 
Funny ow Trump always wants Due Process ... for White Republican Men

... but when it comes to anyone else, they're Guilty as Accused.



So Trump supporters ... riddle me this!

Are we all to believe that Two (2) Women LIED to The FBI and The FBI LIED to The Administration about these Women being abused?
 
I kinda feel sorry for White Women who support Donald Trump ... you'd think they deserved batter, but I guess they're not worth it.

Very Freudian slippy there.

I don't think people should vote for a candidate based on race or gender or religion, but yeah.... we mostly do in the end. The white women I know in real life who voted for him did so for various religious reasons, mostly his vacillating take on abortion. Interestingly, all the black women I know in real life did *not* vote for him, despite being deeply religious with one exception.
 
Very Freudian slippy there.

I don't think people should vote for a candidate based on race or gender or religion, but yeah.... we mostly do in the end. The white women I know in real life who voted for him did so for various religious reasons, mostly his vacillating take on abortion. Interestingly, all the black women I know in real life did *not* vote for him, despite being deeply religious with one exception.


Good Focus on what's Important and you'll be just fine
 
So how, exactly, is this different than The Emails?

You kidding? No similarity. Porter is a wife beater. From photos showing her face to a restraining order protecting her. And he did it to 2 wives. Then Trump backs him and will not accept the evidence.. did porterrs wife send emails? Porter and Jarod are allowed to handle top secret information without getting clearance, That is corrupt in so many ways.
 
Porter should have kneeled during the anthem then Trump would have called him the son of a bitch that he is.
 
You kidding? No similarity. Porter is a wife beater. From photos showing her face to a restraining order protecting her. And he did it to 2 wives. Then Trump backs him and will not accept the evidence.. did porterrs wife send emails? Porter and Jarod are allowed to handle top secret information without getting clearance, That is corrupt in so many ways.

Oh, I agree. I'm just saying that the tightie Righties made a huge big giant deal about Hillary's private email server -- yet here is a guy who has a restraining order against him for domestic violence, who hasn't received a top secret clearance of any sort, allowed to handle and view and discuss classified information. Aren't they rather similar? If one is criminal, isn't the other?
 
Kelly knew trump was an abuser when he went to work for him so obviously Kelly doesn't really care much about abusers.
 
Bourbon is the new Desh. Starting 30 useless threads a day. Maybe lay off the sauce for awhile? Take a deep breath.
 
Back
Top