Romney was dead on balls accurate

But today in his responce he stood by what he said, although he tried to seperate the 47% from those who are dependent on the government.

I think Willard is done for... but we shall see.
 
Jarod said:
But today in his responce he stood by what he said, although he tried to seperate the 47% from those who are dependent on the government.

I think Willard is done for... but we shall see.
Click to expand...

He's done alright. Stick a fork in his ass.

At this point, he's got nothing else to lose. He's already lost an election that he should have won.
 
Jarod said:
Damocles still holds out hope.
Click to expand...

stock-photo-happy-boys-laughing-out-loud-together-44456053.jpg
 
ekg said:
what was it Romney said when made excuses for only paying 13% on his tax that one year? That he paid what was required of him and not a penny more?

but 47% who pay what is required of them.. and not a penny more .. they're parasites who he doesn't need to concern himself with ? and you cheer him on?

why is it 'good tax policy' for someone of Romney's wealth to pay a very minimal, but legal, rate.. but when someone making >30,000 gets the same benefit they're mooching off the system? 62% of Romney's leeches do pay taxes, they pay them in payroll(and btw, they paid more than they would have in income tax), and 1/2 remaining 18% are seniors who have already paid into the system their entire lives.. a cpl million of them are WWII vets.. what leeches...

18.1%.. that's the amount that pays no taxes.. some of them seniors.. others, poor beyond words.. but some are the 3000 or so hedgefund guys who made <$2million who didn't pay a dime in IT either..

what was it Romney did? Hedge fund guy? make sense he won't release his taxes then..



According to the tax policy center.. the same organization you used, the gov't gets it's funding from 42% income tax and 40% payroll tax

The-Numbers-Jan-2012-Fig1_1.gif

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/background/numbers/revenue.cfm

but wait? I thought those 40% were victims not paying anything but looking for a handout? The truth is that while they aren't funding the gov't with their income tax, because like Romney et al, they are only paying what is required of them..they ARE funding the gov't with their payroll taxes.

the people they are funding by the way? Parents with disabled children, veterans returning from war who are disabled,people who have lost their jobs,seniors, military families who are on food stamps.. not too mention warren buffet's (and other in his tax bracket) ss and medicare.. IOW the 'victims'.. and the people who just can't seem to take personal responsibility and care for their lives..

and your party has the gall to not just agree with him? but cheer him on and then look at Obama and say "he's divisive".. Romney just shit on 47% of the country by calling them parasites.. he didn't say 47% of the people who will vote for Obama, he said 47% of the country.. IOW, one out of two people in your family, in your workplace, in your life aren't worth the effort to your own party and you are happy with that..

It's no wonder that when these assholes get into office they don't give a shit about you and only work for their own interests.. you don't give shit about yourself.. so why in the hell would they?

I don't know what you do, how wealthy you are.. or what age you are.. but I know this, at some point in time..whether it's due to loss of employment, loss of health, or 'age' you will be one the people your party disdains and labels 'victim looking for a handout'.. how awesome for you.
Click to expand...

47% of the country are takers. 47% pay no federal income tax. Payroll taxes are for defined benefits. Not the same as federal income tax. When debating tax increases it is federal income taxes we are talking about.

As I said, Romney was dead on balls accurate. As for me needing gubment assistance or that bullshit "social safety net" you speak of. Not a chance. I have ordered my life so that I will not need it. Socialist inSecurity? Don't need it. Don't want it. Mediscare? Don't need it. Don't want it. How shocking. I have prepared for eventualities and I am not rich. I have aways lived within my means and I have zero debt. It isn't hard for ANYONE to do if you set proper priorities. But as Romney said, too many people rely on gobblement. That is a problem.

It may be invonvenient for libtards, but it is what they advocate. They create a system that makes more and more people dependent on gobblement.

However, eventually, you will run out of other peoples money as Margaret Thatcher said. I applaud Romney for not apologizing. Don't worry, tomorrow you will have something else to light you tampon string on fire about Romney. It isn't like the MIddle East is on fire or anything ;)
 
blackascoal said:
No it wasn't. It was dead on truth. The same kind of truth that people like you run away from.

I know exactly what Romney said and it was stupid as fuck. He gets to get away with paying as low a tax rate as he can .. lower than most Americans .. but gets to point fingers at others who do the same?

How very stupid .. which has become the trademarl and brand of your side of polotics.

Just incredibly ignorant.
Click to expand...

not the same. Does Romney take advantage of the earned income tax credit? Nope. The EITC is nothing more than welfare. It is a redistribution plan that was supposed to compensate for payroll taxes. Well where does that EITC come from? You got it. Taxpayers.

Nice try though.

It is funny that you libs create a dependency society then deny that there is one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top