Your the fuckhead unwilling to look at the facts.
Russia invaded Ukraine because of Benghazi
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Your the fuckhead unwilling to look at the facts.
LMAO; you wouldn't know a fact if it walked up and introduced itself to you.
Hell; this thread is built on a false premise about what Graham actually said. But alas, I'm trying to argue with a dishonest hyper partisan idiot.
PS; it would be "you're" not "your". For someone who is educated in a field where words have so much meaning, your ignorance regarding the difference is glaring.
How the world see's the situation between Russia & USA
BINGO! But the same can be said for NATO and the EU.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Of course you can separate them, try not to be a bigger idiot than you are already.
You can have a family member sent to a war zone in a war you don't support. Doesn't mean you don't support that person with all your heart.
Our mission is clear in Iraq. Should we have to go in, our mission is very clear: disarmament.
In order to disarm, it will mean regime change. I'm confident that we'll be able to achieve that objective in a way that minimizes the loss of life.
No doubt there's risks with any military operation. I know that. But it's very clear what we intend to do. And our mission won't change. The mission is precisely what I just stated. We've got a plan that will achieve that mission should we need to send forces in.
In order to disarm, it will mean regime change. I'm confident that we'll be able to achieve that objective in a way that minimizes the loss of life.
No doubt there's risks with any military operation. I know that. But it's very clear what we intend to do. And our mission won't change. The mission is precisely what I just stated. We've got a plan that will achieve that mission should we need to send forces in.
No you cannot separate them. You cannot publicly impugn the mission, particularly after you voted to send men and women into harm’s way like Kerry did, and not expect it to have a negative impact on the mission and morale.
Of course if you are a brain dead dunce of a Liberal too stupid to comprehend the global implications of such partisan buffoonery, you also pretend that the enemy does not read the news and doesn't know how to manipulate public opinion; a lesson they learned very well during the Vietnam War.
So spare me more of your uneducated and naive dialogue to the contrary.
John Kerry: “and there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of -- of -- of -- historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not. Iraqis should be doing that. And after all of these two and a half years, with all –“
Dick Durbin: “If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime--Pol Pot or others--that had no concern for human beings. Sadly, that is not the case. This was the action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.”
Harry Reid: "I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and — you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows — (know) this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq (Wednesday),"
And those objectives were met with astounding success. It only took 42 days to destroy the biggest standing Army in the middle East and topple the Saddam regime at the cost of 139 US soldiers; a resounding success and amazing feat.
But of course, in Liberal loony land this is failure.
Two points:
(1) I posted that quote in response to your assertion that disarmament was not the mission in Iraq.
(2) The mission of disarmament was acheived long before it even became the mission. There were no WMDs to disarm.
Did you read the Joint Resolution? Yes or No?
LOL. I'm so old I remember when the President, not Congress, was Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
Olaf the Peacock
New member
Maybe they are holding back because, as you point out, "Is it smart to make that type of statement( or any statement) in the middle of this crisis"
Damned if you do and damned if you don't, huh ?
¿¡ EL PADRO?!
El n00b
The revolution in Ukraine has been infiltrated and taken over by right-fascists. Putin invaded Crimea to protect the ethnic Russians there from ethnic cleansing by the Ukrainian Nazis now in charge. IMO, we should back him, and seek the restoration of the legitimate president of Ukraine from the current fascist tyrants.
¿¡ EL PADRO?!
El n00b
Iraq is geographically indefensible, we have the most powerful military on the world. To celebrate such a victory us stupidity beyond words, you idiotic neocon.
Did you read the Joint Resolution? Yes or No?
LMAO
You're a moron.
¿¡ EL PADRO?!
El n00b
There is a reason that Mesopotamia has been thrown around between various empires for the past few thousand years, it's the easiest to invade stretch of flat, featureless land on the face of the Earth. Afghanistan and Vietnam are real challenges, Iraq is pathetic.