S&M Death Raises Questions

http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/us/2007/10/11/D8S77IBG0_bondage_death/index.html



S&M Death Raises Legal Questions
By DENISE LAVOIE Associated Press Writer

Oct 11th, 2007 * LYNN, Mass -- Adrian Exley was wrapped tightly in heavy plastic, then bound with duct tape. A leather hood was put over his head with a thin plastic straw inserted so that he could breathe, and he was shut up in a closet.

That, apparently, was the way Exley liked it. But the way it ended — with Exley suffocating — was not what he had in mind when he traveled from Britain for a bondage session with a man he had met through a sadomasochism Web site.

Exley's body was discovered in the woods last year, two months after he was bound up in the bondage "playroom" Gary LeBlanc had built in the basement of his suburban Boston home. LeBlanc, a 48-year-old Gulf Oil sales executive, detailed his responsibility in the fatal bondage session in a five-page suicide note, just before he put a gun to his head and killed himself.

Now the question is: Since Exley consented to the sex play, can LeBlanc be held responsible for his death?

Exley's family is suing LeBlanc's estate for unspecified damages, claiming wrongful death. Many bondage enthusiasts are watching the case closely, seeing it as lesson in where to draw the line of responsibility on consensual but dangerous sex.

"There's definitely the whole spectrum of thought on what really happened — whether it was a consent issue, or negligence or misunderstanding," said Vivienne Kramer, a board member of the New England Leather Alliance. "Everybody has their own ideas on what should have happened."

Exley and LeBlanc met through an online forum for gay men into rubber, leather and bondage. Exley, a 32-year-old stripper, used the screen name "Studpup," while LeBlanc called himself "Rubrman" and built a chamber with rubber mats on the floors and walls, chains, leather restraints, rubber suits and a hospital gurney.

Exley arrived at LeBlanc's house in Lynn in April 2006 after the pair had exchanged e-mails in which they discussed plans for LeBlanc to play the "master" and Exley his "slave," according to the lawsuit.

John Andrews, a lawyer for LeBlanc's estate, said Exley knew the risks going in. "What occurred was an act or actions between two consenting adults, both of whom knew what they were doing, and it had a tragic end," he said.

The lawsuit describes a three-day bondage and discipline session that ended when a third man, Scott Vincent, discovered Exley was not breathing. Exley had been put in a closet while bound in plastic up to his neck and left alone for several hours, according to the lawsuit.

In his suicide note, LeBlanc admitted that Exley at one point had trouble breathing. But he said that after "cooling him down," Exley improved. LeBlanc said that he went to sleep about 3 a.m. but was woken up a few hours later by Vincent, who told him Exley was not breathing and was turning blue and cold.

LeBlanc said he panicked, and he and Vincent drove to Rhode Island, where they buried the body and threw away Exley's clothing and identification.

The Rhode Island medical examiner determined that Exley suffocated. Vincent said in a sworn statement that the straw had fallen out of his mouth in the closet.

Vincent, a flight attendant who is also being sued, is charged with failure to report a death in Rhode Island. But he has not been charged in Massachusetts.

In his note, LeBlanc said he was "responsible for a horrible tragedy," adding: "Had I dealt with the first crisis responsibly, he would likely have returned home safely."

Lawyers for Exley's estate acknowledge that Exley wanted to participate in a bondage session, but say he did not know about LeBlanc's reputation as an "extreme edge player" in the world of bondage and sadomasochism.

"Just because you are agreeing that you will allow someone to tie you up temporarily as part of role-playing doesn't mean that you are consenting to be killed or to be left alone or to be abused," attorney Randy Chapman said.

Several people who came forward after Exley's death told police that LeBlanc had restrained them and left them alone for long periods, or ignored their requests that he curtail a bondage session.

Both actions go against the bondage protocols, which say participants must stop if their partner uses a prearranged "safe word" or "safe signal" and must not leave anyone who is bound alone, said Susan Wright, a spokeswoman for the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom.

Brian Plant, a bondage and sadomasochism practitioner from Kansas, said: "Nobody goes into these things saying, `Oh, well, I'm going to die because of it.' You reach a point when the line is crossed, and it is no longer consensual."

Kathy Jo Cook, a lawyer who specializes in wrongful death cases, said that when you take away the sensational details of the Exley case, the claim being made by Exley's estate is the same made in many other wrongful death cases.

"The law says if a person causes the death of another person by an act which is either negligent or reckless, that person is liable," Cook said. "You have a duty to behave reasonably. I think it's the same thing here, albeit a very strange set of facts."

It was Exley's mother, Maggie Horner, who decided to sue LeBlanc's estate.

"We decided that we didn't want Gary's last wishes being granted when Adrian's couldn't be," she said. "Why should Gary be able to kill my son, bury my son, shoot himself and still get his own way?"
 
Oh god, stop it, you are freaking me out with this stuff Damo.
I never thought I would be able to use that knowledge for anything. Yet the board has been on about the subject lately...

:D

Anyway the amount of trust given you by a sub (if you are a Dom) is immense. You have more than just crossed a line if it has reached even serious injury, let alone actual death.
 
I never thought I would be able to use that knowledge for anything. Yet the board has been on about the subject lately...

:D

Anyway the amount of trust given you by a sub (if you are a Dom) is immense. You have more than just crossed a line if it has reached even serious injury, let alone actual death.

Damn! That goes way beyond the falling backward with confidence that your friend will catch you that we had to practice in my undergrad Abnormal Psych class! Shudder! I didn't even like that!
 
I know of one case where there was this guy who put an ad in the newpaper asking for someone to come and let him eat them. Someone came, and consented to letting him eat them. The man was still held with manslaughter.

The case isn't against LeBlanc, though. It's a civil case against his estate, which is supposedly worth a few million. Hey, if your son is going to do something stupid and consent to getting himself in such a dangerous situation, it's best to have it done to him by a rich guy. ;)
 
Damn! That goes way beyond the falling backward with confidence that your friend will catch you that we had to practice in my undergrad Abnormal Psych class! Shudder! I didn't even like that!

i remember those trust exercises, I didn't care for them either!
 
Damn! That goes way beyond the falling backward with confidence that your friend will catch you that we had to practice in my undergrad Abnormal Psych class! Shudder! I didn't even like that!

True dat. The guy definitely put himself into some serious trust with very little knowledge of the guy he was trusting. I couldn't do it, that's for sure!
 
On a serious note, someone should really distribute pamphlets and informational flyers at the next republican convention on the dangers of being an irresponsible Dom.
 
Damn! That goes way beyond the falling backward with confidence that your friend will catch you that we had to practice in my undergrad Abnormal Psych class! Shudder! I didn't even like that!

Seriously.

Although I will say, I don't think I'll forget this thread.
 
I never thought I would be able to use that knowledge for anything. Yet the board has been on about the subject lately...

:D

Anyway the amount of trust given you by a sub (if you are a Dom) is immense. You have more than just crossed a line if it has reached even serious injury, let alone actual death.


I never thought I would be able to use that knowledge for anything. Yet the board has been on about the subject lately...


LOL...nice recovery.

Seriously, I felt unclean after the first paragraph of this weirdo stuff. I didn't even finish the article. :rolleyes:
 
I never thought I would be able to use that knowledge for anything. Yet the board has been on about the subject lately...


LOL...nice recovery.

Seriously, I felt unclean after the first paragraph of this weirdo stuff. I didn't even finish the article. :rolleyes:
The book didn't sell. There was no reason to use it after that. It isn't like it is a theme of my writing on any regular occasion. I did learn a lot about some very interesting people though.

I could write one of those CSI things where kinks are prevalent.
 
Interesting case. Civil law is a bit more rubbery (sorry) than criminal law so it will be enlightening to see what comes out of it. It may be settled in the corridor of the courthouse though.

At criminal law it's entirely possible that LeBlanc would have been convicted of manslaughter so if it does go ahead it may well be that it's successful.
 
Back
Top