San Fran sues high capacity magazine repair kit makers

tekkychick said:
Are you incapable of understanding that I want to stay on topic, and that's not the topic of the forum?
Click to expand...
If would answer the question, perhaps you would see how the two relate. I can assure you it is very much on topic.

I'm not debating the 2nd amendment with you. Neither of us will change the other's position.
Click to expand...
Nor will you ever be proven right on the matter.
I am willing to discuss the topic of this forum - should manufacturers who flout a state's law be prosecuted?
Click to expand...
Repair kits are not illegal if used as such. Should I be able to sue Ford if I speed? Or Jack Daniels if I drink to excess? Or Stanley tools if I smash my thumb with their hammer?
You are unable to stick on topic. Therefore, why should I answer anything you throw at me?
Click to expand...
Again, it is on topic. If you are so sure in your position then what harm is it in answering?

You may assume whatever you want if I don't respond. I doubt it will have any connection to reality. But make up whatever stories you want to help you sleep at night.
Click to expand...
I think it is you who could use more grounding in reality, if you are so afraid to answer such a simple question.
 
tekkychick said:
And I am trying to stay on topic. YOU were the one that tried to equate car shop stuff with a law that actually exists. I pointed out the fallacy in your argument. You choose not to see it. At this point, {shrug} there's nothing else to say.
Click to expand...
the classification of capability vs action was spot on. you should try answering it to avoid looking like someone who wants the law because it feels good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top