Didn't McConnell deny Merrick Garland a SCOTUS hearing by saying that there shouldn't be a SCOTUS pick in an election year? Yes, he did!
And before our resident tRump "worshippers" chime in to defend "Moscow Mitch", the comments he made about not having a SCOTUS pick if the Senate and WH were controlled by different parties, was a ridiculous "rehabilitation" attempt that McConnell made later when he realized the FULL ramifications of what he had said.
The bottom line is that McConnell knew that Merrick would be CONFIRMED and thus denied him his right to a hearing.
Funny how our "phony" Constitutional Conservatives have no problem with violations of "due process" when it serves their agenda.
And before our resident tRump "worshippers" chime in to defend "Moscow Mitch", the comments he made about not having a SCOTUS pick if the Senate and WH were controlled by different parties, was a ridiculous "rehabilitation" attempt that McConnell made later when he realized the FULL ramifications of what he had said.
The bottom line is that McConnell knew that Merrick would be CONFIRMED and thus denied him his right to a hearing.
Funny how our "phony" Constitutional Conservatives have no problem with violations of "due process" when it serves their agenda.