Senate could vote to reinstate Glass-Steagall

FUCK THE POLICE

911 EVERY DAY
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...senate-could-vote-to-reinstate-glass-steagall


Warner: Senate could vote to reinstate Glass-Steagall


By Michael O'Brien - 05/01/10 12:00 PM ET




Senators could approve an amendment to reestablish the separation between banks' commercial and investment operations, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) suggested.

Warner, a member of the Senate Banking Committee who's been closely involved in negotiations over a Wall Street reform bill, said that while he opposed such a measure, the Senate could get the votes to reimpose the Depression-era Glass Steagall law.

"It may have a chance," Warner said during an appearance on C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" of the chances for passage of an amendment to reimpose the law, which was repealed by Congress in 1999.

The Senate will begin voting on amendments next week to Democrats' Wall Street reform bill in a bid to improve the legislation and win Republican support for the underlying bill. Warner said that he expect that process to wrap up by the end of this month, when lawmakers break for a Memorial Day recess.

A bipartisan group of senators have pushed for the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, which would force banks to separate their commercial and investment activities. Other key amendments would seek to make more explicit that public funds cannot be used to bail out banks, limit the size of banks, audit the Federal Reserve, and more.

Warner said that he personally opposed the reimposition of Glass-Steagall, reasoning that it would put the U.S. financial services industry at a competitive disadvantage versus firms in other nations.

"I think that we can't unscramble those things. A lot of senators wish they had their votes back in 1999 when they basically did away with the walls and the barriers between investment banking and banking that Glass-Steagall had in place," Warner said. "But the world has changed pretty dramatically."

The first-term Virginia senator said that the council of regulators called for in the Senate legislation would address problems with the size and activities of firms in a better way than reimposing Glass-Steagall would.

"But let's let them make that judgment in an orderly fashion," Warner said of the council of regulators, "rather than potentially putting American firms at a competitive disadvantage to an increasingly interconnected financial world."
 
"But let's let them make that judgment in an orderly fashion," Warner said of the council of regulators, "rather than potentially putting American firms at a competitive disadvantage to an increasingly interconnected financial world."

That's probably just the words of a lobbyist that's been whispering in his ear.
 
Warner: Senate could vote to reinstate Glass-Steagall

Man, FDR was totally right.
fdru.jpg


Outstanding. We’re all New Dealers, Keynesians, and passionate regulators now.

Fascinating to see former advocates of deregulation “suddenly” cheering for one of FDR’s prominent New Deal reforms.

My take away lesson: Honestly, in the wake of the financial meltdown and the Gulf oil spill, message boarding just isn’t as fun anymore.

Now that we’re all New Dealers, Keynesians, and passionate regulators, it’s like pulling teeth to draw out any of those message boarders who spent a lifetime arguing for more deregulation and for getting government out of the way.

Bummer. Those were good times. Is the “Drill baby, drill” cabal still around here, or did they go into hiding as well?

On the comedic side, I guess we can banter about Obama’s birth certificate, or about how global warming is a hoax perpetrated by a vast, global conspiracy of lying Marxist scientists.
 
Man, FDR was totally right.
fdru.jpg


Outstanding. We’re all New Dealers, Keynesians, and passionate regulators now.

Fascinating to see former advocates of deregulation “suddenly” cheering for one of FDR’s prominent New Deal reforms.

My take away lesson: Honestly, in the wake of the financial meltdown and the Gulf oil spill, message boarding just isn’t as fun anymore.

Now that we’re all New Dealers, Keynesians, and passionate regulators, it’s like pulling teeth to draw out any of those message boarders who spent a lifetime arguing for more deregulation and for getting government out of the way.

Bummer. Those were good times. Is the “Drill baby, drill” cabal still around here, or did they go into hiding as well?

On the comedic side, I guess we can banter about Obama’s birth certificate, or about how global warming is a hoax perpetrated by a vast, global conspiracy of lying Marxist scientists.

Once again your idiocy reigns supreme. You pretend that people must either be for or against ALL government regulation. It isn't black and white you moron.

I believe some regulations are needed... ie Glass Steagall and I have been saying that for years. Other regulation, like Sarbanes Oxley, Cap and Trade, Patriot Act, Tax code are almost completely moronic. (note, before you go off on one of your pathetic strawmen attempts... I am not suggesting we eliminate the tax code... just that it is insanely more complex than is needed)

The same holds true for Keynesian theory. It CAN be put to good use OR it can be fucked up. It depends on WHAT you do and HOW you do it. THAT is what makes it good or bad. Those who think it is good or bad regardless of how it is implemented are simply morons....
 
Any serious analysis of anything fianancial is lost on libs. Either you are fully for or against regulations. ANd the entire world as it was before obama is off limits for analysis because it all represents "failed ideas of the past". In libs mind they can only think what obama tells them to think. there is no past, there is no future, there is only groupnow.
 
Any serious analysis of anything fianancial is lost on libs. Either you are fully for or against regulations. ANd the entire world as it was before obama is off limits for analysis because it all represents "failed ideas of the past". In libs mind they can only think what obama tells them to think. there is no past, there is no future, there is only groupnow.

No.
 
And what's so bad about Sarbanes-Oxley? We don't want another Enron or Worldcom. And Oxley provides a significant deterrent from people wanting to attempt something like that.

Even free market fanatics like Greenspan like it.
 
Back
Top