Sexual Harrasment Training

cawacko

Well-known member
So our company makes it mandatory everyone attend. Of course I was told I needed to attend the session twice. Anyhow, the highlight (to me) was the list of people/groups you can't discrminate against (or based on): religion, sex, sexuality, age, handicapped etc. and it ended with 'any other protected group'.

They didn't get into what comprised "any other protected group" but I wish I could find out. Somehow I don't think I would fall into the protected group... white, male, heterosexual and Republican. I may be the only person not to fall into that group. Now maybe white, male, heterosexual and Democrat could be out of the protected group but they may find an out to join the protected group.
 
So our company makes it mandatory everyone attend.

Of course I was told I needed to attend the session twice...



Damn straight you need to attend twice. Your predilection for posting homoerotic, rant filled posts against me, and a fascination with male porn stars and dirty magazines suggests you need to be first in line for these classes.

:cof1:



(just teasing)
 
My sexual harrassment does need some training before I can reach my full potential.

Good work by your company.
 
So our company makes it mandatory everyone attend. Of course I was told I needed to attend the session twice. Anyhow, the highlight (to me) was the list of people/groups you can't discrminate against (or based on): religion, sex, sexuality, age, handicapped etc. and it ended with 'any other protected group'.

They didn't get into what comprised "any other protected group" but I wish I could find out. Somehow I don't think I would fall into the protected group... white, male, heterosexual and Republican. I may be the only person not to fall into that group. Now maybe white, male, heterosexual and Democrat could be out of the protected group but they may find an out to join the protected group.

I wish they would pass laws protecting the rights of white, Christian males too Cawacko. Sometimes, in my more unrealistic moments, I have this dream, that one day, a white Christian male will be President of the United States.

I know, I know...you can say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.
 
Men, in porn, are pretty much props. They have a dick and it gets hard. The women make all the money and are the reason people buy the tapes. Some men gain a level of notoriety, but in the end, it's the women they're fucking that matters in the end. You can actually make more money in the porn market by appearing in gay porn and appealing to a male audience than having sex with women, and there's almost no market for porn made for women. The whole porn market is something unique to our sex.

I know a little something about everything.
 
So our company makes it mandatory everyone attend.

Of course I was told I needed to attend the session twice...



Damn straight you need to attend twice. Your predilection for posting homoerotic, rant filled posts against me, and a fascination with male porn stars and dirty magazines suggests you need to be first in line for these classes.

:cof1:



(just teasing)

Sounds alot like the RA training here:

http://www.mindingthecampus.com/forum/2007/10/indoctrination_at_delaware_1.html

October 30, 2007
Indoctrination At Delaware

Posted by John Leo

Many universities try to indoctrinate students, but the all-time champion in this category is surely the University of Delaware. With no guile at all the university has laid out a brutally specific program for "treatment" of incorrect attitudes of the 7,000 students in its residence halls. The program is close enough to North Korean brainwashing that students and professors have been making "made in North Korea" jokes about the plan. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has called for the program to be dismantled. Residential assistants charged with imposing the "treatments" have undergone intensive training from the university. The training makes clear that white people are to be considered racists - at least those who have not yet undergone training and confessed their racism. The RAs have been taught that a "racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture, or sexuality."

FIRE reports that the university's views "are forced on students through a comprehensive manipulation of the residence hall environment, from mandatory training sessions to 'sustainability' door decorations." Residents are pressured to promise at least a 20 percent reduction in their ecological footprint and to promise to work for a "oppressed" group. Students are required to attend training sessions, floor meetings and one-on-one sessions where RAs ask personal questions such as "When did you discover your sexual identity?". Students are pressured or required to accept an array of the university's approved views. In one training session, students had to announce their opinions on gay marriage. Those who did not approve of gay marriage were isolated and heavily pressured to change their opinion.

The indoctrination program pushes students to accept the university's ideas on politics, race, sex, sociology, moral philosophy and environmentalism. The training is run by Kathleen Kerr, director of residential life, who reportedly considers it a "cutting-edge" program that can be exported to other universities around the country. Residential assistants usually provide services to residents and have light duties, such as settling squabbles among students. Kerr and her program are more ambitious. She has been quoted as saying that the job of RAs is to educate the whole human being with a "curricular approach to residential education." In this curricular approach, students are required to report their thoughts and opinions. One professor says: "You have to confess what you believe to the RA." The RAs write reports to their superiors on student progress in cooperating with the "treatment."

The basic question about the program is how did they think they could ever get away with this? Most campus indoctrination is more subtle, with some wiggle room for fudging and deniability. This program implies a frightening level of righteousness and lack of awareness. But the RAs have begun to back away a step or two. After telling the students the program is mandatory, the RAs sent an email saying the sessions are actually voluntary.
 
Back
Top