Should STEM degrees be outlawed?

M

MarcusA

Verified User
I'd argue that worthless STEM degrees are a blight upon our nation, and responsible for its degeneracy and uglifciation.

I think it may be time to ban STEM degrees, and replace education instead with an emphasis on classical literature and culture, such as requiring the reading of Marcus Aurelius.

Generally speaking, STEM degrees are just for ugly and noncreactive types of people, who are only capable of performing simplistic, rote, and repetitive types of activities, which are obviously aesthetically inferior as well from the perspective of those of superior creativity, higher intellect, and aesthetic senses.

Eventually, most of those ugly and inferior "jobs" which said worthless degrees allow can just automated by simplistic robots and scripts which are more efficient, and quite a bit less aesthetic as well.

Once the ugly and noncreative class, and rather worthless and dip-sensible type of "people" is naturally weeded out by automation, this will hopefully enable the superior man and woman to spend their time on higher aesthetic and creative pursuits, as well a revival of classical culture, arts, and politics.

(Much as in times past, a woman has sadly had to stoop to marrying a hideous and aesthetically inclined primate of inferior genetic worth, simply because he or rather "it" served a pragmatic need; hopefully this will put an end to said individuals of inferior worth, and enable women to be more aesthetically selective in their love preferences, enabling superior progeny and a much more beautiful future for mankind, than they currently have to settle for).

In the meantime, I'd argue that simply banning ugly and hideous STEM degrees would pave the way for the dissolution of this ugly and inferior industry and crop of people; with funding, instead diverted to automation research, so that the ineffectual individuals who make up the boring majority of said "jobs" in question will be weeded out and irrelevant to the evolution of culture for the foreseeable future..
 
MarcusA said:
I'd argue that worthless STEM degrees are a blight upon our nation, and responsible for its degeneracy and uglifciation.

I think it may be time to ban STEM degrees, and replace education instead with an emphasis on classical literature and culture, such as requiring the reading of Marcus Aurelius.

Generally speaking, STEM degrees are just for ugly and noncreactive types of people, who are only capable of performing simplistic, rote, and repetitive types of activities, which are obviously aesthetically inferior as well from the perspective of those of superior creativity, higher intellect, and aesthetic senses.

Eventually, most of those ugly and inferior "jobs" which said worthless degrees allow can just automated by simplistic robots and scripts which are more efficient, and quite a bit less aesthetic as well.

Once the ugly and noncreative class, and rather worthless and dip-sensible type of "people" is naturally weeded out by automation, this will hopefully enable the superior man and woman to spend their time on higher aesthetic and creative pursuits, as well a revival of classical culture, arts, and politics.

(Much as in times past, a woman has sadly had to stoop to marrying a hideous and aesthetically inclined primate of inferior genetic worth, simply because he or rather "it" served a pragmatic need; hopefully this will put an end to said individuals of inferior worth, and enable women to be more aesthetically selective in their love preferences, enabling superior progeny and a much more beautiful future for mankind, than they currently have to settle for).

In the meantime, I'd argue that simply banning ugly and hideous STEM degrees would pave the way for the dissolution of this ugly and inferior industry and crop of people; with funding, instead diverted to automation research, so that the ineffectual individuals who make up the boring majority of said "jobs" in question will be weeded out and irrelevant to the evolution of culture for the foreseeable future..
Click to expand...


Your trolling is mildly amusing...but don't you have something better to do?
 
MarcusA said:
I'd argue that worthless STEM degrees are a blight upon our nation, and responsible for its degeneracy and uglifciation.

I think it may be time to ban STEM degrees, and replace education instead with an emphasis on classical literature and culture, such as requiring the reading of Marcus Aurelius.

Generally speaking, STEM degrees are just for ugly and noncreactive types of people, who are only capable of performing simplistic, rote, and repetitive types of activities, which are obviously aesthetically inferior as well from the perspective of those of superior creativity, higher intellect, and aesthetic senses.

Eventually, most of those ugly and inferior "jobs" which said worthless degrees allow can just automated by simplistic robots and scripts which are more efficient, and quite a bit less aesthetic as well.

Once the ugly and noncreative class, and rather worthless and dip-sensible type of "people" is naturally weeded out by automation, this will hopefully enable the superior man and woman to spend their time on higher aesthetic and creative pursuits, as well a revival of classical culture, arts, and politics.

(Much as in times past, a woman has sadly had to stoop to marrying a hideous and aesthetically inclined primate of inferior genetic worth, simply because he or rather "it" served a pragmatic need; hopefully this will put an end to said individuals of inferior worth, and enable women to be more aesthetically selective in their love preferences, enabling superior progeny and a much more beautiful future for mankind, than they currently have to settle for).

In the meantime, I'd argue that simply banning ugly and hideous STEM degrees would pave the way for the dissolution of this ugly and inferior industry and crop of people; with funding, instead diverted to automation research, so that the ineffectual individuals who make up the boring majority of said "jobs" in question will be weeded out and irrelevant to the evolution of culture for the foreseeable future..
Click to expand...

black pill irony...lol
 
Basically, ugly, boring STEM jobs which are probably "mastered" by Kindergarten should be outlawed, and no longer made a viable "career" for the slave-class which is too lacking in any talent to do or pursue anything else; this for example is what ineffectual idiots call "math", not the same as true mathematics and savantry which is predicated on creativity and higher mental facualties, not ugly and ineffectual rote calculation and unpleasant things of that nature.

Said jobs should be automated, and the slave-class which makes them viable to begin with rendered irrelevant. Not suitable "work" for those of superior traits and naturally superior contributions to society by mere virtue of their existence.

Once this is done, and the slave class which perpetuates them is rendered obsolete, I'd wager a revival in classical and high culture could be attempted.
 
There was a time when college was seen as a place to educate and enlighten the upper class. They were taught history, philosophy, logic, greek and Latin and ethics. Now it has become an apprenticeship. I remember when Farrakhan gave a speech talking about how college had become a place to learn a job. He was right, but wrong for suggesting it was just blacks having that experience.
it is not the schools doing it. I remember when taking classes you had to take for a degree like English and history, i would talk to other students who were so disinterested. They said they did not care about history but would do just enough to get by. The degree was going to open the doors.
 
MarcusA said:
I'd argue that worthless STEM degrees are a blight upon our nation, and responsible for its degeneracy and uglifciation.

I think it may be time to ban STEM degrees, and replace education instead with an emphasis on classical literature and culture, such as requiring the reading of Marcus Aurelius.

Generally speaking, STEM degrees are just for ugly and noncreactive types of people, who are only capable of performing simplistic, rote, and repetitive types of activities, which are obviously aesthetically inferior as well from the perspective of those of superior creativity, higher intellect, and aesthetic senses.

Eventually, most of those ugly and inferior "jobs" which said worthless degrees allow can just automated by simplistic robots and scripts which are more efficient, and quite a bit less aesthetic as well.

Once the ugly and noncreative class, and rather worthless and dip-sensible type of "people" is naturally weeded out by automation, this will hopefully enable the superior man and woman to spend their time on higher aesthetic and creative pursuits, as well a revival of classical culture, arts, and politics.

(Much as in times past, a woman has sadly had to stoop to marrying a hideous and aesthetically inclined primate of inferior genetic worth, simply because he or rather "it" served a pragmatic need; hopefully this will put an end to said individuals of inferior worth, and enable women to be more aesthetically selective in their love preferences, enabling superior progeny and a much more beautiful future for mankind, than they currently have to settle for).

In the meantime, I'd argue that simply banning ugly and hideous STEM degrees would pave the way for the dissolution of this ugly and inferior industry and crop of people; with funding, instead diverted to automation research, so that the ineffectual individuals who make up the boring majority of said "jobs" in question will be weeded out and irrelevant to the evolution of culture for the foreseeable future..
Click to expand...

I agree. Nice post, thank you.
 
Well, you can go to college to get a degree that leads to a career from engineering, to science, to business, to law, that sort of thing, or you can go and get a worthless liberal arts degree that qualifies you to be the night manager at a Walgreens because you can actually make complete sentences and are reasonably reliable--something you could have gotten from an actual high school education.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Well, you can go to college to get a degree that leads to a career from engineering, to science, to business, to law, that sort of thing, or you can go and get a worthless liberal arts degree that qualifies you to be the night manager at a Walgreens because you can actually make complete sentences and are reasonably reliable--something you could have gotten from an actual high school education.
Click to expand...

Have you ever known of a night manager at Walgreens who has a BA in liberal arts? Or are you blabbering in ignorance as usual?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Well, you can go to college to get a degree that leads to a career from engineering, to science, to business, to law, that sort of thing, or you can go and get a worthless liberal arts degree that qualifies you to be the night manager at a Walgreens because you can actually make complete sentences and are reasonably reliable--something you could have gotten from an actual high school education.
Click to expand...
So the old cliches go, yeah...

Plus, realistically that's kind of silly to begin with, "degrees" no matter what type are just a medium of exchange, like money; allegedly the majority of jobs are actually made through networking or negotiating contracts or deals with others, whether or not there is a "degree" involved as a requirement. (This is where the "super-rich" make most of their money, from deals as opposed to working for a "fixed wage").

So no, a degree no matter what type can't "force" anyone to give a job out to a person, that's under the delegation of the employer, company, etc - in theory, the company could hire the person he met in college, or who was a member of his dad's country club over the person with the allegedly more "qualified" degree or resume.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top