Should we give the US to England.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
“Trump envoy Witkoff pressed the Ukrainian delegation on handing over Donetsk region to Russia during a meeting on Friday, - WP.

He used the Kremlin's key argument that the region is predominantly Russian-speaking.”
 
“Trump envoy Witkoff pressed the Ukrainian delegation on handing over Donetsk region to Russia during a meeting on Friday, - WP.

He used the Kremlin's key argument that the region is predominantly Russian-speaking.”
We WON that war, moron.
 
The destruction of Ukraine in the effort to hurt Russia (which failed completely) should give the rest of the world some thinking points before volunteering to be meat for the meat grinders in Imperial Empire aggressions.
 
The US kicked England's butt, Ukraine isn't kicking Russia butt. So no Jarod we shouldn't give the US back.
We had substantial help from the 18th century global superpower France, and it still took us 8 years to defeat the British.

Ukraine is simply making the same kind of request we made in the 1770s: United States support for their fight for freedom against Russia.
 
We had substantial help from the 18th century global superpower France, and it still took us 8 years to defeat the British.

Ukraine is simply making the same kind of request we made in the 1770s: United States support for their fight for freedom against Russia.
Ukraine has had massive support from around the world.


Your point? We made no "request'; we forced England's surrender.
 
We have a bunch of radical Leftist Hispanic groups calling for giving the SW US back to Mexico...

La Raza
MeCha
Brown Berets
Pueblos sin Fronteras
etc.
 
Ukraine has had massive support from around the world.


Your point? We made no "request'; we forced England's surrender.
Dude, not really.

The French were there in strength and the Brits were also fighting the Dutch and the Spanish on different fronts as well as the French on a fourth front outside the Americas.
 
Dude, not really.

The French were there in strength and the Brits were also fighting the Dutch and the Spanish on different fronts as well as the French on a fourth front outside the Americas.

You're speaking the truth England was preoccupied with other wars. If that were not the case then all of the protagonists would have been unceremoniously rounded up and hanged in public.
 
Dude, not really.

The French were there in strength and the Brits were also fighting the Dutch and the Spanish on different fronts as well as the French on a fourth front outside the Americas.
Now all of Europe is a dead zone....not worth the effort it would take to take as the Russians keep point out.
 
“Trump envoy Witkoff pressed the Ukrainian delegation on handing over Donetsk region to Russia during a meeting on Friday, - WP.

He used the Kremlin's key argument that the region is predominantly Russian-speaking.”

Re the thread title: No. We don't want to become a Muslim state run by raghead refugees from failed states who just want to recreate their failures everywhere they infest.

And fuck the Kremlin; it's just a gangster syndicate, not a real govt.
 
Now all of Europe is a dead zone....not worth the effort it would take to take as the Russians keep point out.

Even the Dutch are getting sick of the feral vermin. Europe will get around to repelling the scum soon. You will cry a lot about that then same as you whine about anything now.
 
Ukraine has had massive support from around the world.
Europe has limited military capabilities compared to the United States. Being on the right side of history means supporting Ukrainian freedom.
Your point? We made no "request';
We relentlessly pursued French support for our rebellion against Britain, until they agreed to give it.
we forced England's surrender.
It's doubtful we would have prevailed in the rebellion against Britain without help from the 18th century superpower France.
 
Back
Top