Shrinking the Earth's Population to 100 People---would look like what?

Libhater

Libhater

Verified User
If we could shrink the earth's population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all the existing
human ratios remaining the same, it would look something like the following:

There would be:

57 Asians
21 Europeans
14 from the Western Hemisphere, both north and south
8 would be Africans

52 would be female
48 would be male

70 would be non-white
30 would be white

70 would be non-Christian
30 would be Christian

89 would be heterosexual
11 would be homosexual

6 people would possess 59% of the entire world's wealth, and all 6 would be from the United States

80 would live in substandard housing

70 would be unable to read

50 would suffer from malnutrition

(ONE) 1 would be near death
(ONE) 1 would be near birth
(ONE) 1 (yes only 1) would have a college education
(ONE) 1 (yes only 1) would own a computer

When one considers our world from such a compressed perspective, the need for acceptance,
understanding and education becomes glaringly apparent.
 
I reject that 11% of the population are queer. I'm sorry but that's simply not true.

Which brings the entire article's reliability and value into question.

Another LBGTQ+ propaganda piece disguised as interesting.
 
ULTRA MAGA said:
I reject that 11% of the population are queer. I'm sorry but that's simply not true.

Which brings the entire article's reliability and value into question.

Another LBGTQ+ propaganda piece disguised as interesting.
Click to expand...

I would tend to agree with you on that observation that 11% of the world's population is queer, but having
seen the leftists on TV having these gay pride parades, and swinging those multi colored gay pride flags around,
and having queer trannies dancing around at children's school story hour makes me think that 11% isn't that far
off the mark.
 
Libhater said:
I would tend to agree with you on that observation that 11% of the world's population is queer, but having
seen the leftists on TV having these gay pride parades, and swinging those multi colored gay pride flags around,
and having queer trannies dancing around at children's school story hour makes me think that 11% isn't that far
off the mark.
Click to expand...
A very noisy and very tiny minority. Think of 100 random people you know. Are ten of them gay? I think not.

My guess is 2-3%
 
ULTRA MAGA said:
A very noisy and very tiny minority. Think of 100 random people you know. Are ten of them gay? I think not.

My guess is 2-3%
Click to expand...
Well, out of a 100 people I know there are no gays, but then again, I don't hang out with trannies, or with
anyone supporting or actually a part of their cult. You could be right about guessing that the gay population
may very well be about 2-3%, but again, most if not all of these gays are leftists, and I certainly don't hang
around with leftists, so perhaps with our huge leftist population, the chances of there being 11% of them
being gay is a reasonable possibility. Take in the fact that young liberal women don't want to get married, so that
increases the chance that they will become lesbians, just like the leftist feminists of the 1960s that most turned
to lesbianism to suit their sexual desires.
 
Libhater said:
I would tend to agree with you on that observation that 11% of the world's population is queer, but having seen the leftists on TV having these gay pride parades, and swinging those multi colored gay pride flags around, and having queer trannies dancing around at children's school story hour makes me think that 11% isn't that far off the mark.
Click to expand...


Claims made without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The phrase "Claims made without evidence may be dismissed without evidence" is a paraphrase of a principle often attributed to Christopher Hitchens, a British-American author and journalist. It’s commonly known as "Hitchens's Razor", a modern take on the Latin legal principle "Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur" ("What is asserted without reason may be denied without reason").

Hitchens popularized this idea in his writings and debates, particularly in his 2007 book God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, where he emphasized skepticism and the burden of proof.

he didn’t coin it as an exact quote in that form, the phrasing has been distilled from his arguments, especially from discussions like his 2003 Slate article or public debates where he challenged unproven assertions.

The earliest concise formulation of this specific wording seems to have emerged post-Hitchens, around 2010-2011, in online forums and skepticism circles, solidifying as "Hitchens's Razor" after his death in 2011.

It’s a practical heuristic rather than a formal philosophical axiom, echoing Carl Sagan’s "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" but with a sharper edge. No single definitive "he said it here" moment exists—unlike, say, a Einstein quote tied to a 1905 paper—but Hitchens’s intellectual footprint is unmistakable.


@Grok
 
Libhater said:
Well, out of a 100 people I know there are no gays, but then again, I don't hang out with trannies, or with
anyone supporting or actually a part of their cult. You could be right about guessing that the gay population
may very well be about 2-3%, but again, most if not all of these gays are leftists, and I certainly don't hang
around with leftists, so perhaps with our huge leftist population, the chances of there being 11% of them
being gay is a reasonable possibility. Take in the fact that young liberal women don't want to get married, so that
increases the chance that they will become lesbians, just like the leftist feminists of the 1960s that most turned
to lesbianism to suit their sexual desires.
Click to expand...
Yah I suppose it could be around 11% of leftists.

Unlike Faggots, Dykes don't need to get it up so it's easier to swing both ways. Probably pretty tricky to fake faggotry unless all you do is catch.
 
No definitive evidence supports the claim that 11% of the global population is homosexual. Estimating the percentage of people identifying as homosexual—or more broadly as LGBTQ+—is challenging due to variations in definitions, self-reporting biases, cultural stigmas, and limited global data. Let’s break this down based on available research as of February 20, 2025.

Globally, studies suggest a range far lower than 11%. A 2023 Ipsos survey across 30 countries found that 3% of adults identified as gay, lesbian, or homosexual, with an additional 4% identifying as bisexual, 1% as pansexual/omnisexual, 1% as asexual, and 3% as "other," totaling 9% identifying as LGBTQ+ broadly. This survey, while extensive, isn’t fully representative of the entire world, as it excludes many regions (e.g., most of Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia) where homosexuality is less likely to be openly reported due to legal or social pressures. A 2021 World Population Review estimate pegged the global figure at around 8% for those identifying as homosexual, bisexual, or pansexual, with 80% heterosexual and 12% unreported. These figures align with earlier research, like Alfred Kinsey’s 1940s studies, which suggested 10% of men had significant homosexual experience, though his methods were criticized for bias.

The 11% figure might stem from misinterpretations, such as conflating same-sex attraction or behavior with identity.

Globally, concealment is widespread—83% of sexual minorities hide their orientation, per a 2019 Yale study—suggesting reported numbers underestimate reality.

Yet, even accounting for this, no credible global survey extrapolates to 11% identifying as homosexual specifically.

So, is 11% homosexual plausible? Not based on current data. The 11% might reflect a specific context (e.g., attraction in a tolerant country) or a broader LGBTQ+ category, but homosexuality alone typically falls between 3–5% in most studies. The global population, estimated at 8.1 billion in 2025, would yield 891 million homosexual individuals at 11%—far exceeding the 243–405 million suggested by 3–5%. Without a comprehensive, unbiased global census (which doesn’t exist), 11% remains speculative and unsupported. The true percentage is likely higher than reported but still well below that threshold.


@Grok
 
Gender confused people are not our big problem.

Right wing swill like Libby, Legion, and Ultra Idiot--that's what's destroying civilization.

Political conservativism is the far more devasting birth defect.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Gender confused people are not our big problem. Right wing swill like Libby, Legion, and Ultra Idiot--that's what's destroying civilization. Political conservativism is the far more devasting birth defect.
Click to expand...

I agree. Gender confusion is a form of defect, but I doubt it's natal.

If you think conservatives are "destroying civilization",do something about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top