Sinclair Lewis’s Nightmare: On “This Happened Here” and “Rising Fascism in America”

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
THE UNITED STATES is dancing dangerously close to fascism’s trip wire. One false move or fateful push from the Trump personality cult could inflict irreparable damage to its already fragile democracy. Since January 6, 2021, mainstream reporters and commentators have finally started addressing this danger with appropriate urgency. The typically tepid New York Times and Washington Post have run several stories on the republic’s potential transformation into an autocratic state. Academics openly discuss the possibility of “civil war,” and a few pundits, such as Guardian columnist Robert Reich and Joy Reid, host of her own nightly MSNBC talk show, have actually uttered the f-word — fascism.

Early in their books, Street and DiMaggio provide lengthy summaries of the key traits of fascist movements. DiMaggio reviews the leading literature on fascism, from scholars like Roger Griffin and Robert Paxton, philosophers like the aforementioned Stanley and Theodor Adorno, and journalists like David Neiwert, and divides the critical characteristics of fascist politics into the following subsections: “White Supremacy and Ultra-Nationalism,” “Militarism and Empire,” “Mass Hysteria and the Cult of the Patriarchal Personality,” “Eliminationism and One-Party Rule,” “Corporatism, Anti-Communism, and the Political Dictatorship of the State,” “Social Darwinism,” and “Paramilitarism and the Mobilization of Mass Violence.”

It requires only an honest review of the public record to confirm DiMaggio’s conclusion:



Trump’s politics should be classified as neofascistic, meeting to various degrees six of the seven prerequisites of fascism while recognizing that contemporary America is not simply a retread of fascist Italy or Germany. The paramilitarism and eliminationist politics observed during the Trump years were not comparable in scope to the one-party dictatorships existing in Hitler’s Germany and Mussolini’s Italy. Still, to ignore the dangers inherent in the rising neofascistic movement on the American right during the Trump years (and beyond), and the ways that it has manifested itself in American politics, is to court disaster.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article...-happened-here-and-rising-fascism-in-america/
 
thumb_dm-the-problem-with-you-is-youre-completely-delusional-yeah-60125452.png
 
Here is an outsider’s view by Lenore Taylor, editor of Guardian Australia, who watched a Trump presser in September 2019.


As a regular news reader I thought I was across the eccentricities of the US president. Most mornings in Australia begin with news from America – the bid to buy Greenland, adjustments to a weather map hand-drawn with a Sharpie, or another self-aggrandising tweet.

But watching a full presidential Trump press conference while visiting the US this week, I realised how much the reporting of Trump necessarily edits and parses his words, to force it into sequential paragraphs or impose meaning where it is difficult to detect.

The press conference I tuned into was held in Otay Mesa, California, and concerned a renovated section of the wall on the Mexican border.

I joined as the president was explaining at length how powerful the concrete was. Very powerful, it turns out. It was unlike any wall ever built, incorporating the most advanced “concrete technology”. It was so exceptional that would-be wall-builders from three unnamed countries had visited to learn from it.

The wall was “amazing”, “world class”, “virtually impenetrable” and also “a good, strong rust colour” that could later be painted. The president signed his name on it and spoke for so long the TV feed eventually cut away, promising to return if news was ever made.

He did at one point concede that would-be immigrants, unable to scale, burrow or risk being burned, could always walk around the incomplete structure. This seemed to me to be an important point, but the monologue quickly returned to concrete.

In writing about this not-especially-important or unusual press conference, I’ve run into what US reporters must encounter every day. I’ve edited skittering, half-finished sentences to present them in some kind of consequential order, and repeated remarks that made little sense.

In most circumstances, presenting information in as intelligible a form as possible is what we are trained for. But the shock I felt hearing half an hour of unfiltered meanderings from the president of the United States made me wonder whether the editing does our readers a disservice.

I’d understood the dilemma of normalising Trump’s ideas and policies – the racism, misogyny and demonisation of the free press. But watching just one press conference from Otay Mesa helped me understand how the process of reporting about this president can mask and normalise his full and alarming incoherence.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...e-us-i-was-stunned-by-trumps-press-conference


She doesn’t say that Trump is a fascist. :) She may think he’s too dumb to be a fascist. But then she hasn’t had a close look at his cultists. Duces don’t have to be very smart, just not as dumb as most of their followers.
 
THE UNITED STATES is dancing dangerously close to fascism’s trip wire. One false move or fateful push from the Trump personality cult could inflict irreparable damage to its already fragile democracy. Since January 6, 2021, mainstream reporters and commentators have finally started addressing this danger with appropriate urgency. The typically tepid New York Times and Washington Post have run several stories on the republic’s potential transformation into an autocratic state. Academics openly discuss the possibility of “civil war,” and a few pundits, such as Guardian columnist Robert Reich and Joy Reid, host of her own nightly MSNBC talk show, have actually uttered the f-word — fascism.

Early in their books, Street and DiMaggio provide lengthy summaries of the key traits of fascist movements. DiMaggio reviews the leading literature on fascism, from scholars like Roger Griffin and Robert Paxton, philosophers like the aforementioned Stanley and Theodor Adorno, and journalists like David Neiwert, and divides the critical characteristics of fascist politics into the following subsections: “White Supremacy and Ultra-Nationalism,” “Militarism and Empire,” “Mass Hysteria and the Cult of the Patriarchal Personality,” “Eliminationism and One-Party Rule,” “Corporatism, Anti-Communism, and the Political Dictatorship of the State,” “Social Darwinism,” and “Paramilitarism and the Mobilization of Mass Violence.”

It requires only an honest review of the public record to confirm DiMaggio’s conclusion:



Trump’s politics should be classified as neofascistic, meeting to various degrees six of the seven prerequisites of fascism while recognizing that contemporary America is not simply a retread of fascist Italy or Germany. The paramilitarism and eliminationist politics observed during the Trump years were not comparable in scope to the one-party dictatorships existing in Hitler’s Germany and Mussolini’s Italy. Still, to ignore the dangers inherent in the rising neofascistic movement on the American right during the Trump years (and beyond), and the ways that it has manifested itself in American politics, is to court disaster.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article...-happened-here-and-rising-fascism-in-america/

Trump's programs are intended to foster greater freedom for ALL AMERICANS and to restrict the intrusion of government into the lives and business of ALL AMERICANS.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
 
Back
Top