Sites Leftist aren't allowed to read.

Robo

Verified User
For more than half a century, advocates for a government-run, single-payer approach to health care coverage have touted its potential. With debate over the Affordable Care Act heating up by the day, progressives, both at the state and federal levels are now pushing anew to move to some form of this system. Most recently, the California Legislature introduced a bill to accomplish this, although without any details of how it would work.

On the surface, the arguments sound reasonable. Cut out the middleman — the insurance company — and use the savings to provide universal coverage at lower cost. Yet all attempts in the United States to implement this concept have failed. For example, Vermont made a serious run at a state-based, single-payer system — only to see it abandoned after only three years, due to major cost increases and the need to dramatically raise taxes to fund the expense.

In practice, a single-payer system would cost more than the most efficient and effective programs that exist today, all while compromising access and, over time, quality. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2017/03/3-myths-single-payer-system-doomed-fail.html


Why A Single Payer Health Care System Is a Really Bad Idea
www.newsweek.com/why-single-payer-health-care...
The failure of single-payer health care to innovate is then complicated by the impossible constraint whereby people do not have to pay for any of the health care they get.

Pacific Research Institute | Socialized medicine a global failure
www.pacificresearch.org/socialized-medicine-a...
Socialized medicine a global failure. ... Single-payer health care is back in the news. ... Swedish residents have gravitated toward private insurance to avoid the ..

Why single payer health care is a terrible option (Opinion ...
www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/opinions/single-payer...
Despite its decades of documented failure in Western Europe, single-payer health care has newfound among support Democrats -- and it could come at great cost to the American people, writes Scott W ...

Canada’s Single-Payer Health Care System: A Cautionary Tale ...
www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/canada-single...
Before America adopts single-payer health care, legislators should consider the failures of that model in Canada. ... who manage their health-insurance monopoly and transfer funds to the local ...
 
Single payer has provided universal care and better quality for half the cost or less. It has been working for a long time. The American system was a presidential campaign argument for nearly a century. Candidates never argued that our system was good, but that it was poor and going to bankrupt the country. It was never addressed because the lobbying power of the healthcare industry is incredible. No matter what terrible practices come out, they just kept happening.
Do we know that Americans are being cheated and gouged by Pharm. Yep, but nothing stops it. How about overbilling and padding bills in hospitals. Yep, we know that is occurring. 20 dollar asperines, forgeddaboutit. How about a Hospital system cheating Medicare out of mega millions and paying a multi dollar fine. Florida voted the chief officer into the governorship and now the Senate.
We should tear it down and build it right. Universal, single payer is a good start.
 
"Out of the 33 developed countries, 32 have universal health care. They adopt one of the following three models. In a single-payer system, the government taxes its citizens to pay for health care. Twelve of the 32 countries have this system.Dec 24, 2018"
https://www.thebalance.com/universal-health-care-4156211

"Why America Is the Only Rich Country Without Universal Health Care"






For more than half a century, advocates for a government-run, single-payer approach to health care coverage have touted its potential. With debate over the Affordable Care Act heating up by the day, progressives, both at the state and federal levels are now pushing anew to move to some form of this system. Most recently, the California Legislature introduced a bill to accomplish this, although without any details of how it would work.

On the surface, the arguments sound reasonable. Cut out the middleman — the insurance company — and use the savings to provide universal coverage at lower cost. Yet all attempts in the United States to implement this concept have failed. For example, Vermont made a serious run at a state-based, single-payer system — only to see it abandoned after only three years, due to major cost increases and the need to dramatically raise taxes to fund the expense.

In practice, a single-payer system would cost more than the most efficient and effective programs that exist today, all while compromising access and, over time, quality. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2017/03/3-myths-single-payer-system-doomed-fail.html


Why A Single Payer Health Care System Is a Really Bad Idea
www.newsweek.com/why-single-payer-health-care...
The failure of single-payer health care to innovate is then complicated by the impossible constraint whereby people do not have to pay for any of the health care they get.

Pacific Research Institute | Socialized medicine a global failure
www.pacificresearch.org/socialized-medicine-a...
Socialized medicine a global failure. ... Single-payer health care is back in the news. ... Swedish residents have gravitated toward private insurance to avoid the ..

Why single payer health care is a terrible option (Opinion ...
www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/opinions/single-payer...
Despite its decades of documented failure in Western Europe, single-payer health care has newfound among support Democrats -- and it could come at great cost to the American people, writes Scott W ...

Canada’s Single-Payer Health Care System: A Cautionary Tale ...
www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/canada-single...
Before America adopts single-payer health care, legislators should consider the failures of that model in Canada. ... who manage their health-insurance monopoly and transfer funds to the local ...
 
Medicare for all

No one owes you healthcare. It's not the government's responsibility to make sure you have it just like it's not the government's responsibility to make sure you eat, are clothed, have a place to live, etc. It's YOUR responsibility.
 
"Out of the 33 developed countries, 32 have universal health care. They adopt one of the following three models. In a single-payer system, the government taxes its citizens to pay for health care. Twelve of the 32 countries have this system.Dec 24, 2018"
https://www.thebalance.com/universal-health-care-4156211

"Why America Is the Only Rich Country Without Universal Health Care"

How many of those countries have a system of government just like the U.S.?

What happens to those that aren't paying those taxes? Are the children paying the taxes or just the adults?
 
Single payer has provided universal care and better quality for half the cost or less. It has been working for a long time. The American system was a presidential campaign argument for nearly a century. Candidates never argued that our system was good, but that it was poor and going to bankrupt the country. It was never addressed because the lobbying power of the healthcare industry is incredible. No matter what terrible practices come out, they just kept happening.
Do we know that Americans are being cheated and gouged by Pharm. Yep, but nothing stops it. How about overbilling and padding bills in hospitals. Yep, we know that is occurring. 20 dollar asperines, forgeddaboutit. How about a Hospital system cheating Medicare out of mega millions and paying a multi dollar fine. Florida voted the chief officer into the governorship and now the Senate.
We should tear it down and build it right. Universal, single payer is a good start.

There's an easy way to stop the overbilling and padding. Don't provide services to those that can't pay because that's why those of us that are responsible enough to have coverage are paying more.

The SP proposal involves taxing people to fund the system. What about those that don't pay the taxes? Is a 5 year old going to pay those taxes?
 
Third rate people demand the government set up a system for healthcare because they think they're owed something.

Have you considered moving to Africa? They don't have Universal Health Care there, you would fit right in.
 
Have you considered moving to Africa? They don't have Universal Health Care there, you would fit right in.

Have you ever considered doing something without expecting the government to do it for you?

My healthcare coverage is just fine and it isn't there for any reason other than I was responsible enough to make sure I had it. Since I don't give a fuck about you or your family, whether you have it is irrelevant to me.
 
Have you ever considered doing something without expecting the government to do it for you?

My healthcare coverage is just fine and it isn't there for any reason other than I was responsible enough to make sure I had it. Since I don't give a fuck about you or your family, whether you have it is irrelevant to me.

I have chosen the 'European Plan' ... you have chosen the 'African Plan'. We both get to make decisions on what direction the Country takes.
 
I have chosen the 'European Plan' ... you have chosen the 'African Plan'. We both get to make decisions on what direction the Country takes.

I've chosen the personally responsible plan. You choose to be a lazy POS.

I've provided what I'm supposed to provide for my family and you want the government to force me to provide it to yours. I care about my family and don't give a shit about yours. Apparently you don't give a shit about yours either.
 
For more than half a century, advocates for a government-run, single-payer approach to health care coverage have touted its potential. With debate over the Affordable Care Act heating up by the day, progressives, both at the state and federal levels are now pushing anew to move to some form of this system. Most recently, the California Legislature introduced a bill to accomplish this, although without any details of how it would work.

On the surface, the arguments sound reasonable. Cut out the middleman — the insurance company — and use the savings to provide universal coverage at lower cost. Yet all attempts in the United States to implement this concept have failed. For example, Vermont made a serious run at a state-based, single-payer system — only to see it abandoned after only three years, due to major cost increases and the need to dramatically raise taxes to fund the expense.

In practice, a single-payer system would cost more than the most efficient and effective programs that exist today, all while compromising access and, over time, quality. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2017/03/3-myths-single-payer-system-doomed-fail.html


Why A Single Payer Health Care System Is a Really Bad Idea
www.newsweek.com/why-single-payer-health-care...
The failure of single-payer health care to innovate is then complicated by the impossible constraint whereby people do not have to pay for any of the health care they get.

Pacific Research Institute | Socialized medicine a global failure
www.pacificresearch.org/socialized-medicine-a...
Socialized medicine a global failure. ... Single-payer health care is back in the news. ... Swedish residents have gravitated toward private insurance to avoid the ..

Why single payer health care is a terrible option (Opinion ...
www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/opinions/single-payer...
Despite its decades of documented failure in Western Europe, single-payer health care has newfound among support Democrats -- and it could come at great cost to the American people, writes Scott W ...

Canada’s Single-Payer Health Care System: A Cautionary Tale ...
www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/canada-single...
Before America adopts single-payer health care, legislators should consider the failures of that model in Canada. ... who manage their health-insurance monopoly and transfer funds to the local ...

Why do people like you think that America is too stupid to do what every other industrialized nation has been able to do...cover ALL people and do it at less cost than we incur now?

We Americans should be able to borrow from the world's models (particularly that of Canada and the UK)...and actually improve on them in some ways.

What is it with you defeatists?
 
I've chosen the personally responsible plan. You choose to be a lazy POS.

I've provided what I'm supposed to provide for my family and you want the government to force me to provide it to yours. I care about my family and don't give a shit about yours. Apparently you don't give a shit about yours either.

Make sure you reject Medicare when you hit 65. The Doctors and Lawyers would rather get their hands on everything you worked for your entire life than you handing it down to your kids.
 
Why do people like you think that America is too stupid to do what every other industrialized nation has been able to do...cover ALL people and do it at less cost than we incur now?

We Americans should be able to borrow from the world's models (particularly that of Canada and the UK)...and actually improve on them in some ways.

What is it with you defeatists?

America has to do everything their own way. The country is toxic from excess, and full of greed, and the other 7 sins. Christian nation, my ass.
 
Last edited:
Medicare for all is a good transition step, but ultimately, it's still public funding of private services which is too expensive.

What we really need are public services--a UK style National Health Service.

It will come to that eventually, so why wait?
 
Back
Top