So let’s take this one at a time.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Count 1

Page 5 paragraph 10, section 8.

The defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election flood to get state, legislatures and election officials to subvert legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the defendants opponent, Joseph R, Biden, Junior, to electoral votes for the defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the defendant punished pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise, millions of voters; dismiss, legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors, in favor of the defendant.

This is the wording from the indictment, one of three different facts that lead up to a violation of 18 USC 371….
 
18 usc 371

“If two or more persons conspire, either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof an any manner for any purpose, and one or more of such a persons do at any act, to affect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned, not more than five years or both.”
 
Count 1

Page 5 paragraph 10, section 8.

The defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election flood to get state, legislatures and election officials to subvert legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the defendants opponent, Joseph R, Biden, Junior, to electoral votes for the defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the defendant punished pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise, millions of voters; dismiss, legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors, in favor of the defendant.

This is the wording from the indictment, one of three different facts that lead up to a violation of 18 USC 371….

If I must click on your thread to have any idea what it is about then you have failed at title writing.

Can you do better?
 
If I must click on your thread to have any idea what it is about then you have failed at title writing.

Can you do better?

I think I’m pretty good at it, I got a delusional kook like you to read a dose of truth!
 
What is untrue about it?

you have absolutely no evidence that Trump did those things, you are on the record saying you doubt the prosecuting attorney can get a conviction, yet here you are lying about the allegations of the indictment.....
 
Count 1

Page 5 paragraph 10, section 8.

The defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election flood to get state, legislatures and election officials to subvert legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the defendants opponent, Joseph R, Biden, Junior, to electoral votes for the defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the defendant punished pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise, millions of voters; dismiss, legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors, in favor of the defendant.

This is the wording from the indictment, one of three different facts that lead up to a violation of 18 USC 371….

Talk about sweeping generalities... Wow!
 
Count 1

Page 5 paragraph 10, section 8.

The defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election flood to get state, legislatures and election officials to subvert legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the defendants opponent, Joseph R, Biden, Junior, to electoral votes for the defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the defendant punished pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise, millions of voters; dismiss, legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors, in favor of the defendant.

This is the wording from the indictment, one of three different facts that lead up to a violation of 18 USC 371….

arz-302t19_t3-jpg.1347402
 
you have absolutely no evidence that Trump did those things, you are on the record saying you doubt the prosecuting attorney can get a conviction, yet here you are lying about the allegations of the indictment.....

I’m on record saying that? What? Untrue.

I don’t have the evidence… But Smith says he does. If Smith can prove the above, Trump is guilty.
 
Back
Top