SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS at it again.

Eagle_Eye

Eagle_Eye

Well-known member
The latest victim in the never ending attempt to erase the memory of slavery is the Dixie Highway.

The Dixie Highway was a United States automobile highway, first planned in 1914 to connect the US Midwest with the Southern United States.
Click to expand...

Heavens we have a highway named Dixie after the south OMG!
 
Eagle-Eye said:
The latest victim in the never ending attempt to erase the memory of slavery is the Dixie Highway.



Heavens we have a highway named Dixie after the south OMG!
Click to expand...

I have long maintained that our public commons and public property should not be named after enemy nations, like The Confederate States of America, nor after enemy combatants who waged war on soldiers serving under the American flag, aka Confederate generals.

There is plenty of private property in this nation if someone wants to have shrines to the confereracy.
 
:) Hahahahahahahaha ....
You can never have TOO many streets and schools named 'Marten Luther King, Jr.'.
 
Cypress said:
I have long maintained that our public commons and public property should not be named after enemy nations, like The Confederate States of America, nor after enemy combatants who waged war on soldiers serving under the American flag, aka Confederate generals.

There is plenty of private property in this nation if someone wants to have shrines to the confereracy.
Click to expand...

Maybe it can be named the James Earl Ray Highway.
 
Jack said:
:) Hahahahahahahaha ....
You can never have TOO many streets and schools named 'Marten Luther King, Jr.'.
Click to expand...

ONE is too many.

I have noticed that the streets named after King tend to be in the highest crime and worst economic areas of the cities where they exist.
 
CFM said:
ONE is too many.

I have noticed that the streets named after King tend to be in the highest crime and worst economic areas of the cities where they exist.
Click to expand...

Yes. It's like they are 'throwing a bone' to the 'economic slaves' to keep them happy.
 
Cypress said:
I have long maintained that our public commons and public property should not be named after enemy nations, like The Confederate States of America, nor after enemy combatants who waged war on soldiers serving under the American flag, aka Confederate generals.

There is plenty of private property in this nation if someone wants to have shrines to the confereracy.
Click to expand...

"Dixie" was not an enemy nation or combatant. However, all those things with the names of Indian tribes were enemy combatants along with the Japanese American National Museum and German American Heritage Center both contain the names of enemy nations.
 
Flash said:
"Dixie" was not an enemy nation or combatant. However, all those things with the names of Indian tribes were enemy combatants along with the Japanese American National Museum and German American Heritage Center both contain the names of enemy nations.
Click to expand...

Owners speaking up for investing in more defamation while white washing the racism is about as close as those saving face making gains with propaganda will get was mid -1970's sociopsychopathilogical human farming in this Christian Nation; being easy enough as disregarding what's in the Congressional record.
 
Cypress said:
I have long maintained that our public commons and public property should not be named after enemy nations, like The Confederate States of America, nor after enemy combatants who waged war on soldiers serving under the American flag, aka Confederate generals.

There is plenty of private property in this nation if someone wants to have shrines to the confereracy.
Click to expand...
Flash said:
"Dixie" was not an enemy nation or combatant!!
Click to expand...

The Confederate States of America declared themselves an independent nation based on a slave economy, attacked American soldiers stationed at Fort Sumter, and waged four years of war against American soldiers serving under the stars and stripes of our great nation

Yes, the Confereracy was an enemy nation, and neither the CSA nor enemy combatants who served in their army should serve as namesakes of our public property or public commons.

There are millions of acres of private property in the South if Neoconfederates want to have shrines to the nation or army of the CSA.


The 1859 song "Dixie"...it later became the de facto national anthem of the Confederacy during the Civil War.
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
I have long maintained that our public commons and public property should not be named after enemy nations, like The Confederate States of America, nor after enemy combatants who waged war on soldiers serving under the American flag, aka Confederate generals.
There is plenty of private property in this nation if someone wants to have shrines to the confereracy.
Click to expand...

Seems to follow that tradition of those crooks on Capital Hill where entries into the Congressional record are erased from history for sociopsychopathological human farming by lynching enforcement to maintain that Islamophobia Christiananality pedophilia master race ethnic cleansing.
 
Cypress said:
The Confederate States of America declared themselves an independent nation based on a slave economy, attacked American soldiers stationed at Fort Sumter, and waged four years of war against American soldiers serving under the stars and stripes of our great nation

Yes, the Confereracy was an enemy nation, and neither the CSA nor enemy combatants who served in their army should serve as namesakes of our public property or public commons.

There are millions of acres of private property in the South if Neoconfederates want to have shrines to the nation or army of the CSA.


The 1859 song "Dixie"...it later became the de facto national anthem of the Confederacy during the Civil War.
Click to expand...

Do you believe that declaration meant they were an independent nation?

When you actually grow a set of balls, why don't you personally come to the South and try to take down those monuments. I bet you don't have the guts to show.
 
saltydancin said:
Owners speaking up for investing in more defamation while white washing the racism is about as close as those saving face making gains with propaganda will get was mid -1970's sociopsychopathilogical human farming in this Christian Nation; being easy enough as disregarding what's in the Congressional record.
Click to expand...

I don't understand your point.

What is in the Congressional Record?

Although when members say they "reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks" means they can add or change speeches they made on the floor. Because it is in the Record does always mean it is true. It contains testimony about government blowing up the dam in New Orleans before Katrina and the CIA introducing cocaine in the inner cities
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top