Speeding MUSCLE CAR (assault vehicle) runs red light - kills NINE PEOPLE in Vegas!!

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Why do we tolerate cars designed for killing? And why do we tolerate speeders and red light runners.? Americans have been brainwashed by the evil fake news press into thinking highway homicide is ok but gun deaths are horrible.

https://news.yahoo.com/9-dead-chaotic-crash-las-141600487.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall

jan 30 2022 Nine people were dead and another was clinging to life in Nevada after a car raced through a red light and slammed into several vehicles, North Las Vegas police said.

Officer Alexander Cuevas, who called Saturday's crash a "chaotic event," said the age of those killed ranged from young children to middle-age adults.

“We have not seen a mass casualty traffic collision like this before,” Cuevas said.

Cuevas said a preliminary investigation indicated a Dodge Charger was speeding as it approached a major intersection at about 3 p.m., then ran a red light. Six cars and 15 people were involved in the crash, he said. Some of the vehicles were pushed into a vacant lot.
Click to expand...
 
Haven't found out yet who the driver was. Almost certainly a non-white though we'll be told it was a white even if the psychopath is so black that rubbing him with a piece of charcoal would leave a white mark. Remember a month or so back how the press lightened the skin color of the black monster darrell brooks who drove his car into the parade at waukesha wisconsin and killed 6.?
 
Running a red light is extremely dangerous and the cause of this accident. Just pointing that out. Speed likely had nothing to do with the cause of the accident, and only with the severity.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Running a red light is extremely dangerous and the cause of this accident. Just pointing that out. Speed likely had nothing to do with the cause of the accident, and only with the severity.
Click to expand...

Red light running should be treated as a very serious crime as should speeding. But of course they aren't . The auto industry pays the legislators and the media to minimize all dangerous driving. Car crashes mean car sales.
 
Watched GMA this morning for any mention of this. I didn't see it. With guns it would have been the lead story.

The auto industry pays the tv nets to ignore highway crashes. They want more crashes. Car crashes mean car sales.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Watched GMA this morning for any mention of this. I didn't see it. With guns it would have been the lead story.

The auto industry pays the tv nets to ignore highway crashes. They want more crashes. Car crashes mean car sales.
Click to expand...

car crashes are bad for insurance companies. Ins cos have far greater political power than car companies.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HUH??? Hey einstein. Without car crashes, there would be no need for car insurance. Insurance companies want MORE car crashes same as the car makers do. THINK
Click to expand...

You were trying to make a point of car companies wanting crashes abd it working because of their supposed power.

I point out that a far more powerful lobby DOESNT want crashed.

You think
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
The auto industry pays the tv nets to ignore highway crashes. They want more crashes. Car crashes mean car sales.
Click to expand...

Car companies do like fender bender car crashes. Cars today get a lot more damage from small crashes, which car companies love. But crashes that kill people are bad for car companies. It means fewer people to buy cars, and they can be sued for the deaths.

The car industry has made great strides in survivability, and car deaths are getting lower. I wish the gun industry would do the same.

Text Drivers are Killers said:
HUH??? Hey einstein. Without car crashes, there would be no need for car insurance. Insurance companies want MORE car crashes same as the car makers do. THINK
Click to expand...

I guess insurance companies would not want no accidents, but definitely want LESS accidents.
 
AProudLefty said:
German ranks 16th as the safest country to drive in. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Because in Germany they make drivers actually learn to drive before they get a license. You have to go through a professional driving school and pass difficult and comprehensive written and driving examinations. In the US, you can be marginally retarded and drunk and get a license...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Because in Germany they make drivers actually learn to drive before they get a license. You have to go through a professional driving school and pass difficult and comprehensive written and driving examinations. In the US, you can be marginally retarded and drunk and get a license...
Click to expand...

And despite what idiots believe, there are speed limits in Germany. There are two default speed limits: 31 mph inside built-up areas and 62 mph outside built-up areas. While parts of the autobahns and many other freeway-style highways have posted limits up to 81 mph, many rural sections have no general speed limit. Some classes of vehicle have specific speed limits, such as trucks. There is a general speed limit of 50 mph for trucks with a GVWR over 7,716 lbs and for vehicles with trailers. Trucks over 7,716 lbs are required to have a built-in speed limiter for a maximum speed of 56 mph, and buses for a maximum speed of 62 mph.

Speed limits are enforced with a small tolerance. Driving 2 mph or faster above the speed limit is a punishable infraction in Germany.

https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/german-driving-laws/

Driver Could Face Jail Time for 259-MPH Autobahn Run


https://www.thedrive.com/news/44098/bugatti-chiron-driver-could-face-jail-time-for-259-mph-autobahn-run
 
Walt said:
Car companies do like fender bender car crashes. Cars today get a lot more damage from small crashes, which car companies love. But crashes that kill people are bad for car companies. It means fewer people to buy cars, and they can be sued for the deaths.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHA. Car companies are very seldom sued for deaths. That's how they get away with selling cars that do 150 mph!!! No industry in america is as irresponsible as the auto industry. THINK
 
90




Driver in deadly North Las Vegas crash has extensive criminal history

The man police say sped through a red light which led to a "mass casualty" crash that killed nine people, including himself, has an extensive criminal history dating back to the 1990s, including multiple cases in courts across the Las Vegas Valley.

Officials identified the driver as 59-year-old Gary Dean Robinson.

Here's a look at what we're finding so far:

Robinson was scheduled to be in Las Vegas Municipal Court on Monday for a speeding ticket he previously pleaded guilty on.

Looking further into his past, a search by his full name reveals charges that include assault with a deadly weapon, domestic violence, and more that paints the picture of a career criminal.

90
 
Legion said:
And despite what idiots believe, there are speed limits in Germany. There are two default speed limits: 31 mph inside built-up areas and 62 mph outside built-up areas. While parts of the autobahns and many other freeway-style highways have posted limits up to 81 mph, many rural sections have no general speed limit. Some classes of vehicle have specific speed limits, such as trucks. There is a general speed limit of 50 mph for trucks with a GVWR over 7,716 lbs and for vehicles with trailers. Trucks over 7,716 lbs are required to have a built-in speed limiter for a maximum speed of 56 mph, and buses for a maximum speed of 62 mph.

Speed limits are enforced with a small tolerance. Driving 2 mph or faster above the speed limit is a punishable infraction in Germany.

https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/german-driving-laws/

Driver Could Face Jail Time for 259-MPH Autobahn Run


https://www.thedrive.com/news/44098/bugatti-chiron-driver-could-face-jail-time-for-259-mph-autobahn-run
Click to expand...

All cars should come with speed limiters. I'm a big fan of states rights but we need a NATIONAL maximum speed limit of 50 with speed limiters set at 55. But liberals say no way - highway homicide is cool.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HUH??? Hey einstein. Without car crashes, there would be no need for car insurance. Insurance companies want MORE car crashes same as the car makers do. THINK
Click to expand...

Actually, what insurers want is you paying a premium and never having an accident. They make money and never pay out on it.

By the by, insurers also rip you off for the most part. Your premium is based primarily on your zip code. If there are a lot of claims in your zip code, your policy cost goes up. Your personal driving record is only a modifier to raise that rate, not lower it. Don't believe me? Go on one of those compare rates sites and put in different zip codes for the area you live in. Your rate goes up and down dramatically in many cases as you do. Thus, your personal driving record has next to nothing to do with what you pay.

Now, if insurance were based primarily on your propensity to get into accidents, your fault or not, which is how it should be--because after all, insurers are insuring you against accidents and nothing else--then that system wouldn't exist. Also, insurers wouldn't raise your rate for tickets since there is no empirical proof or studies that getting tickets outside of accidents makes you more likely to get into accidents. Yep, that's correct! There are virtually no studies or other statistical data to show that getting a shit load of tickets outside of accidents means you will get into accidents.
On the other hand, there is a reasonable correlation between getting into accidents--your fault or not-- and the likelihood you will continue to do so in the future.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Actually, what insurers want is you paying a premium and never having an accident. They make money and never pay out on it. By the by, insurers also rip you off for the most part. Your premium is based primarily on your zip code. If there are a lot of claims in your zip code, your policy cost goes up. Your personal driving record is only a modifier to raise that rate, not lower it. Don't believe me? Go on one of those compare rates sites and put in different zip codes for the area you live in. Your rate goes up and down dramatically in many cases as you do. Thus, your personal driving record has next to nothing to do with what you pay. Now, if insurance were based primarily on your propensity to get into accidents, your fault or not, which is how it should be--because after all, insurers are insuring you against accidents and nothing else--then that system wouldn't exist. Also, insurers wouldn't raise your rate for tickets since there is no empirical proof or studies that getting tickets outside of accidents makes you more likely to get into accidents. Yep, that's correct! There are virtually no studies or other statistical data to show that getting a shit load of tickets outside of accidents means you will get into accidents. On the other hand, there is a reasonable correlation between getting into accidents--your fault or not-- and the likelihood you will continue to do so in the future.
Click to expand...

Aren't geolocation risks based on a variety of factors? Not all states allow your location to be a major rating factor. For example, California law requires that car insurance companies calculate rates based on your driving record, annual miles driven and years of experience before considering your geographic location.

https://www.insure.com/car-insurance/car-insurance-factors.html

What about age-based risk surcharges? Young, single people are charged way more than married ones, regardless of driving history, or lack thereof, aren't they? Isn't that based on predictive reasoning?

Here are the states that don’t allow insurers to rate on age:

California (but can rate on years of driving experience, so those with less experience may pay more)
Hawaii
Massachusetts

Rhode Island does rate based on age but has a regulation to protect senior drivers. Rhode Island auto insurance companies are not permitted to non-renew a policy only because a person is age 65 or older.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top