'Stand Your Ground' Under Investigation

KingofCats said:
no i do not. the numbers are so small that it's irrelevant to mention them. it isn't pertinent to the discussion at all. Again, the fact that you focus on this aspect of my argument shows your unwillingness, or inaptitude, to compete on any relevant intellectual level in the course of this conversation. You may think you are accomplishing something but you are really just being purposefully obtuse and ridiculous. If you want to argue on the merits, I am here, otherwise I will be ignoring this tangent from here on out
Click to expand...

So "no one has ever said someone has the right to just shoot someone carte blanche with zero justification", and "the numbers are so small that it's irrelevant to mention them"?

KingofCats said:
No one has ever said someone has the right to just shoot someone carte blanche with zero justification.
Click to expand...

KingofCats said:
the numbers are so small that it's irrelevant to mention them.
Click to expand...
 
Yeah....I counted them up and its .00000000001 %.......too small to even consider it exists at all......for all practical purposes, ....no one.


Poor AssWipe.....how utterly pathetic.
 
Damocles said:
What is the percentage of murdered "whites" who are victims to cross-racial killing?

Several things are wrong with this statement.

1. It specifies white on black crime then uses the more open "cross-racial" reference when talking about "justifiable homicide" (I would call this self-defense rather than homicide).

2. It clearly indicates a negative connotation to anybody who may defend their own lives against an attacker as somebody who has performed a "homicide".

3. We should celebrate that more people defend themselves rather than run. This clearly tries to say that it is a bad thing that self defense increases where the government recognizes the fundamental right to defend your own life.
Click to expand...

It's because it's a racially motivated attempt to make whites look like the aggressors.
 
KingofCats said:
it's honestly minutia what you are arguing. obviously someone, somewhere, may disagree with my original assertion, but you are being ridiculous, and you know you are being ridiculous. it's not even close to any type of opinion that has more than a dozen in numbers. for all intents and purposes, for all practicality, for all that is relevant to any discussion, my statement stands, and you know this, but you can't muster any other type of retort so you have to play silly distraction games.
Click to expand...

Since he obviously has no intention of being honest, why do you continue to engage the idiot?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top