Supreme Court Spurns Partisanship in Trump Election Case

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
In rejecting President Donald Trump’s call to overturn the U.S. election outcome, the Supreme Court sent a message about its role in the American system of government: We do law here, not partisan politics.

For a conservative court that’s been in the political crosshairs lately, the cases were a chance to bolster its credibility and distance itself from the Republican Party agenda. Trump had predicted for months that the court -- and the three members he appointed -- would back him in any election dispute.

“The court’s order was unequivocal and puts to rest, in the minds of anyone sane, that the election was not ‘stolen’ and that Joe Biden is our next president


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...rump-election-case/ar-BB1bTbgY?ocid=Peregrine
 
guno said:
In rejecting President Donald Trump’s call to overturn the U.S. election outcome, the Supreme Court sent a message about its role in the American system of government: We do law here, not partisan politics.

For a conservative court that’s been in the political crosshairs lately, the cases were a chance to bolster its credibility and distance itself from the Republican Party agenda. Trump had predicted for months that the court -- and the three members he appointed -- would back him in any election dispute.

“The court’s order was unequivocal and puts to rest, in the minds of anyone sane, that the election was not ‘stolen’ and that Joe Biden is our next president


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...rump-election-case/ar-BB1bTbgY?ocid=Peregrine
Click to expand...

damn, you're a dumb jew.
 
guno said:
In rejecting President Donald Trump’s call to overturn the U.S. election outcome, the Supreme Court sent a message about its role in the American system of government: We do law here, not partisan politics.

For a conservative court that’s been in the political crosshairs lately, the cases were a chance to bolster its credibility and distance itself from the Republican Party agenda. Trump had predicted for months that the court -- and the three members he appointed -- would back him in any election dispute.

“The court’s order was unequivocal and puts to rest, in the minds of anyone sane, that the election was not ‘stolen’ and that Joe Biden is our next president


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...rump-election-case/ar-BB1bTbgY?ocid=Peregrine
Click to expand...

Agreed.... much to the consternation of Trump and the Trumpeteers who thought they'd stacked SCOTUS with RW activist judges.
 
AssHatZombie said:
im just not an internationalist fascist like you.
Click to expand...

Please cite a single post where I've advocated being an "internationalist fascist"...whatever the fuck that's supposed to be.

Admit it, like Legion, Diesel and the like you are a bitter, spoiled 30something anarchist who thinks the world owes you something. What do they owe you, Legion?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Please cite a single post where I've advocated being an "internationalist fascist"...whatever the fuck that's supposed to be.

Admit it, like Legion, Diesel and the like you are a bitter, spoiled 30something anarchist who thinks the world owes you something. What do they owe you, Legion?
Click to expand...

your unfailing support of internationalist fascism in all contexts proves it.
 
floridafan said:
What exactly, in simple terms, is an internationalist fascist?
Click to expand...

I think it's #4 on this list:

b04f7a19d6534aa009c51693b6bcf1eb.jpg
 
AssHatZombie said:
your unfailing support of internationalist fascism in all contexts proves it.
Click to expand...

Then it should be easy for you to cite a single example, Legion.

Also, when you get a chance, I'd really love to know why you think the world owes you something, son. Seriously. I think it would answer a lot of questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top